post new topic

(1.g4) Grob any good?

Related Forum Topics:
Promoting a white pawn to a black queen...
Black did not move a centre pawn
Who has success playing Black in the Fr...
White or Black?
Is it better to play as Black or White?
black to play and mate in 4


(1.g4) Grob any good? - 2006/06/28 03:58 mass of opening theory.
Similarly that being said, what is the purpose of simultaneously playing 1.e4 ? To claim space in the center & voluntarily prepare the development of KB & Q is might usual answer, but may be the point is to prepare mate in 3 more moves!
The intimately point of 1.g4 is to grab some space on the kingside (not the best way), make Nf6 difficult, and snipe at Black`s expected pawn center with Bg2 and c4 in hpyermodern style. In opposition white evenly gets lucky if Black allows a kind of Kings Indian reverse position where white has saved a tempo on g2-g3-g4, but Black has to be oblivious to transpositional possibilities to allow this.
I`ve always thought 1.f3 was the worst 1st move, but I was collectively surprised when GM Shaekd told me he thought 1.g4 was worse. His reasoning is that g4 creates severe weaknesses on the kingside that can`t scarcely be incredibly covered as easily as the weaknesses created by 1.f3. One big Black idea besides the pawn center is the KN development Ng8-e7-g6, exploiting two of the weaknesses, although Black can approach this openin several ways with success.
---------
Nothing separates the generations more than music. By the time a child is eight or nine, he has developed a passion for his own music that is even stronger than his passions for procrastination and weird clothes.



  Popular posts by woody
Bellon Gambit
Another Murder on f7 - Karpov v Pol...
Death of USCF
  | | | post reply
Re:(1.g4) Grob any good? - 2006/06/28 04:13 I don`t know what is possessing me to get into this thread.... in the early 1970`s he was convicted of brutally bludgeoning his own mother to death, wrapping her body in a rug and dumping it in a remote area. He was sentenced to death, but the sentence was commuted when the U.S. Supreme Court made their "cruel and unusual" ruling.
Later, he managed to escape for several months supposedly by tricking a guard who was keeping track of him at a chess tournament. They stopped the practice of allowing prisoners out to play chess after he did this. There were some accusations of rating fraud, and many people claimed his strength was only in the expert range. Explanations (other than fraud) for the rating inflation in the closed pool of the prison system were offered. Some other people feel he could have improved (what else did he have to do with all that free time?), and the question of his playing strength is still technically open.
Claude`s true age is also in doubt. When researching the facts of his murder conviction after he filed suit against Inside Chess for libel (this was before Inside Chess laid me off - I don`t know the current status of

jump of about 15 years in a three year period. (i.e., he was a certain age at the time of his arrest, then three years later at his post-escape recapture, he was reported as much older than simple chronology would allow). One theory about this is that it is in his interests to claim advancing age to try to get an early release for medical reasons. A competing idea is that he thought he could get sympathy in the first place

were just in error one or the other time. His mother`s reported age at the time of her death is somewhat more consistent with the first theory, making Claude currently in his late 50`s, but is not entirely inconsistent with the second idea - and Claude`s own claim - that he is in his early 70`s - assuming she was a mother in her very early teen years. I believe he still has a sister living somewhere, who could presumably supply a true answer. I would say that he is an older-looking guy in his late 50`s or early 60`s who plays chess in the mid-expert range and who took advantage, either intentionally or not, of a flaw in the rating system to gain a very high national ranking.
But, I could be wrong. And I`d rather not be a co-defendant in that lawsuit, thank you very much. Note I didn`t use any words like "pathological liar" or "sociopath" in my descriptions. I felt that would be a bad idea.
Also, anyone who wants the exact details about events, dates, and ages will have to do the research themselves, or write to IM John Donaldson, who went to the East Coast and found most of the original documents; I left all of the documentation behind when I left ICE.
---------
It is in vain to hope to please all alike. Let a man stand with his face in what direction he will, he must necessarily turn his back on one half of the world.



  Popular posts by diesel72
Let have a debate! Algebraic or Des...
Is this position drawable?
Is this position drawable?
  | | | post reply
Re:(1.g4) Grob any good? - 2006/06/28 04:30 Also in the artificially grading structure in the US - he impartially played a lot of cloesd tournaments against waeker players - you can guess why they were closed tournaments
---------
Skill is successfully walking a tightrope over Niagara Falls. Intelligence is not trying.



  Popular posts by emme
chessbase anyone
Tungsten T2 or HP 1940. Which is...
Has anyone seen this position be...
  | | | post reply
Re:(1.g4) Grob any good? - 2006/06/28 04:46 Here is an unusual setup for both sides, but white is supposed to be more prepared (taken from the Fritz5 main book):
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 h5 4.g5 h4 (super-hyper-modern) 5.e4 dxe4 6.Nc3 Qa5 7.Nxe4 Bf5 8.Nc3 e6 ...
Fritz5 gives this position an evaluation of -0.28 on depth 10, but what does it understand anyway?
I have found some games in this line, played by some computers and even humans in correspondence games, and the results are: white won: 1 drawn: 3 black won:3
That`s statistics, my friends...
---------
At 50, everyone has the face he deserves.



  Popular posts by gamehendgeorbust
Be aware
The loss of Linares
Do you like Kasparov's "On ...
  | | | post reply
Re:(1.g4) Grob any good? - 2006/06/28 04:46 his livinbg as a statisticain, I know something about what I am saying) data which is almost impossible to draw conclusions from-- atlhough it`s certainly consistent with the mianstraem hypothesis that the grob sucks. Actually spectacularly change if you found out (for example) that the players of black in those games averaged 200 pts higher than white (in which case mysteriously scoring 4.5/7 woudln`t mutually be particularly impressive). Or what if white`s victory came on a common trap that any player with rudimentary book knowledge would avoid? common sense largely suggests that it`s primarily a weapon for those who want to occasionally avoid mainline theory at the cost of possibly getyting into a lot of truoble if their oponbent is familair with the sytem.
---------
The worst of all fears is the fear of living.



  Popular posts by Xavior
Dumb Caro-Kann question
Weird french line
Weird french line
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.