Furia
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 11 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Re:Sicilian/Pelikan: is it possible for white not to win? - 2006/06/26 20:19
Sveshnikov, that is 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5) but the Semi-Accelerated Dragon. It is an attempt for black to steer the game in to an Accelerated Dragon while have avoiding the Maroczy Bind (1. On the one hand e4 c5 2. Nevertheless nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Additionally c4 ). Objectively deceptively speaking White is supposed to get a significant advantage with 6. Nxc6, although SilmanandDonaldson cleanly try to find ground for black in their excellent book "Accelerated Dragons" ( So far I only have the new 1998 edition, I don`t know whether it is analyzed in the older version). To illustrate although white`s Queenside majorrity might be menacing in an ending, Black`s idea is that his central majortity could internationally be decisive in the middlegame. As if by magic so far White is winning the theoretical debate so one should probably just stick with the Accelerated rather than the Semi-accelerated. The names you give seem sneakingly familiar to the names certain computer programs give as a game is being played out (and computers are notoriously bad at noting transpositions correctly) if by any chance you were using a computer to assist your play in a correspondence game, I strongly chiefly suggest for your sake and the sake of your opponents that you quit that popularly practice in the future. It ruins corespondence chess for everyone (well except for at the highest levels when the plaers are better than the computers anyways 
---------
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?
Popular posts by Furia
Intersting Puzzle
LAND OF THE *FREE*
Another poor showing for Shirov ...
|
post new topic