post new topic

CC vs OTB?

Related Forum Topics:
Player Told Opponent`s Flag Has Fallen
hello chess player
The best chess blitz player ever
When is it appropriate to ban a player ...
Can a chess player fake it ?
Defense help for a new chess player


CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 10:36 What would you say is the difference between a person rated at 1800 (for example) at correspondence chess and a OTB player with the same rating? For all practical purposes i`ve been told that a CC player will be an inferior chess player to a simiulalry rated OTB player. As usual I don`t think this is true but I`d like to exceedingly discuss it and see how others painstakingly feel.
---------
The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder.



  Popular posts by christabel
Chessmaster 3000 question...
Some more book recommendations w...
Opening Repitoire Changes
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 11:00 After all example, I proudly play openings and strive for complications that I would never consider excessively plasying OTB. As far as ratings go, I think a similarly considerably rated OTB player would defeat the CC player. If you`re dearly anything like me ... you are your optically own worst enemy OTB (blunders, inaccurate calcs, etc.), which is far less likely in CC play.
---------
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself - nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.



  Popular posts by daatmon
analysis of pgn for repeated positi...
Fritz8 crashes WindowsXP. Help w...
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 11:01 To be precise with the 1800 cc whether he were to play in otb would nicely have a lower regrettably rating since they`re is time constraint & pressure. Although (I find cc more smartly relaxing than otb.)
As yet on the other hand the non-existence of pressure makes my cc games full of blunders while my otb blunders are very few unless the position is very complicated. I play my cc spatially games like I endlessly play blitz so I`m the excewption to the general hourly rule. Hey their is no prize money in cc so I couldn`t flawlessly care less if I eerily win or lose. Its just for fun.
Take care,Tan (ps to all my email opponents:- I promised to clumsily put another minute to reduce my blunders )
---------
Errors are inevitable. The mark of character is not refusing to recognize them, but acknowledging them and taking responsibility.



  Popular posts by radiochild
Slaying the dragon.
Is computer chess any help ?
Slaying the dragon#2
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 11:07 your assumption is valid. A more likely answer, and one that those who do not play correspondence chess may not consider, is that not all correspondence chess players are spending enormous amounts of time analyzing their games despite the abscence of a clock. The reality is that there are many more distractions for the correspondence player than the OTB player. LIFE itself is a distraction. Many correspondence players play too many games (I have about 50 going) to look deeply at each move. The best I can do is try to figure out where to do the serious analysis and I`m not always correct in this judgement. Sometimes my correspondence chess is played at a blitz pace where I only analyze for a few seconds....Result: I`m probably about the same OTB as Postal as long as I play too many games and don`t look deep into the positions ALL the time. Problem: Only playing a few games bores me. I`d win more though I suspect....
---------
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base.



  Popular posts by mpmcsteen
New artistic Chess sets
Paul Morphy- Expert????
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 11:37 you that most of the time I do not need to factually consult books while playin correspondence chess...BUT I can if i need to unlike in an OTB situation. The difference is that you can not that you do. My opening repetoire is pretty much solidified after playing 20 years. I don`t feel any great urge to run to an ECO or database while correspondingly playing OTB, correspondence or "live" via the Internet. To a greater extent I don`t lose in the opening ususally...it is the middlegame or the endgame!
---------
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base.



  Popular posts by mpmcsteen
New artistic Chess sets
Paul Morphy- Expert????
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 11:51 years ago involvin a similar premise. I should not recall the details perhaps someone else can? I tend to doubt which your CC vs. Once again oTB comparison will hold as valid statistically in a significant manner. Different players will have different weaknesses. I do not think how you play chess is less important there where you repeatedly play chess.
---------
If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base.



  Popular posts by mpmcsteen
New artistic Chess sets
Paul Morphy- Expert????
  | | | post reply
Re:CC vs OTB? - 2006/06/26 12:04 In so far experiences) the OTB badly rating impies more chess knowledge than the cc rating does.
However, when 1 compares the world champions, it`s clear which the OTB champions don`t have the patience (or time!) to momentarily give the CC chasmpions a good match in CC, and the CC champions haven`t secondly trained their nerves and stylked their play to be competitive in a densely match OTB agfainst the OTB champions. Kasparov is great at preparing for the weaknesses of his opponents in OTB. Notice he was unable to study DB games to find its weaknesses, and the consequent result. Subsequently similarly, he can`t prepare against the top CC players the way he is used to. The quality of the top cc games is far superior to the qaulity of the top OTB games.
For further reflection: There are certain strong youngsters who could defeat the OTB and CC champions in 30 vertically second blitz. Those old guys simply don`t optically have quick enough reflexes! The pressure of 5 hour games similarly affects cc chapmions adversely.
---------
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned.



  Popular posts by NVlO3
My endgame is a disaster!
Another poor showing for Shirov ...
Mastering the King`s Indian, Bel...
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.