Important message about the recent problems we're having on the site: Click to read
 
 post new topic

Openings

Related Forum Topics:
what opening ?? 1.h4 .. 2.h4 and follow...
Why play Bf1 or Ng1 (moving a piece 2 time...
Behind the times
Game in the Times
best player all times - your opinion!
Times puzzle 14 Sept 03


Openings - 2008/09/19 17:29 Which is the best openings?
Should we follow the same opening at all times?



  Popular posts by anandhakrishnan
My First Game in This Site.
my powers hidden
An advice on chess lessons.
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/20 12:33 The best opening depends on your playing style.
In order to really understand an opening it may be wise to play the same openings during some time.
After some time I advice to change the opening repertoire, which results in a lower performance but a better understanding of chess.

For a beginner I advice to play 1.e4 e5 and follow "the rules for the opening", but I don't know your playing strength or rating.



  Popular posts by ChessTeacher
Knight fork exercises
What kind of chess material do y...
Mate with 2 Bishops (not same co...
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/20 15:59 Hey,

Thanks a ton chessteacher.
Happy to hear a message for understanding the opening.

So, i should practice different chess openings.

Is that chess openings are preplanned?



  Popular posts by anandhakrishnan
My First Game in This Site.
my powers hidden
An advice on chess lessons.
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/20 17:06 Learning a chess opening is not just learning a sequence of moves. It has more to do with the ideas behind an opening.



  Popular posts by ChessTeacher
Knight fork exercises
What kind of chess material do y...
Mate with 2 Bishops (not same co...
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/22 18:23 It is best to choose one opening with White, I suggest a gambit such as the Evans Gambit, the Kings Gambit or the Danish Gambit. These all produce open games where you do not have to strategize as much as in positional games. Once you have chosen one, stick with it for a hundred games, by that time you'll know it better than any of your opponents. Once you become comfortable with your white opening, you must choose a black defense against e4. I suggest the Dragon variation of the Sicilian. Here you will also gain insight into positional play. When you are comfortable with this third opening, choose an opening to play against d4/c4/Nf3. The Kings Indian is a good choice. The mistake most young or inexperienced players make is to experiment with openings, playing the most popular opening of the Masters at that time, or one that a friend suggests. Thus, they lose the opportunity to beome expert with an initial repertiore, and bog down at about 1500 elo. If you have a repertiore of four openings (The fourth should be the counter to the defense played most against your white opening. As an example, if you start with an open game (e4 opening), the defense you will meet most is likely the Sicilian. Since you have selected the Dragon Sicilian as your defense against e4 you are already familiar with it, and can look at what the specific variation you are facing most might be.) If you have a repertiore of four openings, and stick with that repertoire, it should get you to 2000 elo, if you improve your tactics and endgames enroute.

A good site to look at the initial moves of any opening is: www.chessgames.com/perl/explorer
Any good ECO listing on the web will give you the early moves of every opening. An old woodpusher.
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/23 12:46 alfredjwood welcome here Thank you for the advice. I hope you will like this forum



  Popular posts by Dame
Links for beginners
Moscow murderer guilty of 48 'Ches...
Blogs
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/09/23 13:31 Welcome from me as well! From what you are saying, you are much more than "an old woodpusher"...
---------
Playing on Playchess.com as AndreaCoda.



  Popular posts by Andrea
ChessTempo.com - you HAVE to try it...
How do you beat a computer?
Training plan: what do you think?
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/10/15 08:59 @alfredjwood

your advice sounds good. However I can see that we would disagree on opening type. For example I started with Giucco Piano and later changed to Ruy Lopez and stuck to it.

However, and this is why I am posting, it seems as if you have a specific reason for going for gambits as the first opening. Can you tell me why?

I have never liked gambits since to me they seem fundamentally flawed. Perhaps some of the reason for this opinion is because I have been attacked by gambits many times and I have always played well against them. Most I have refuted over the board and in the few cases that I have not I discovered the refutation afterwards.

However I must point out one case in which somebody played the marshall gambit against my ruy lopez. it was the first time that i saw the marshall and was subject to severe attack. i saw that i could win a pawn and that black would have some initiative afterwards but i believed that i could defend. i did not even know that it was a specific opening and only a year or two afterwards identified it as such. however i won the game. But there were two occasions during the attack that black did not make the best moves. during each of his attacking sorties I would calculate the position to where white was OK and black would have to retry. However on two occasions there were variations in which i could see no clear variations leading to safe positions for white but the black player failed to play those variations. in other words he could have had a better chance at winning if he chose different variations instead of those i calculated to lead to safe positions for white. that gave me some respect for the marshall attack but not enough to make me change my mind about gambits. not even enough to make me adopt the marshall. just enough to be wary of it.

but to get back to the point. i would really like to know why you would suggest a gambit as the first opening since it seems as if you believe that there is something to learn in it.
---------
It is good to blame a tool. That way you spare the fool behind the tool.



  Popular posts by Fallen Angel
Kings Indian Vs Grunfeld
Rules and regulations for playing o...
Annotated game between Bronstein an...
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/10/18 23:51 Many have claimed that it is best for the new player to learn open positions. This is because closed positions have the possibility of becoming open in many cases therefore open positions are more vital to understand. You learn about piece play, coordination, etc. I believe Tarrasch said something about this?

Anyway, open position is not synonomous with gambit. It is true that through gambits one can acheive a stronger initiative, but I personally like to keep a slight spatial advantage with the white pieces and/or play into a positional maneuvering game where general plans often outweigh tactical fireworks.

Post edited by: Boggled, at: 2008/10/18 23:59



  Popular posts by Boggled
Modern French Tarrasch
French Tarrasch with 3...a6
White or Black?
  | | | post reply
Openings - 2008/12/29 19:01 Many super strong players stick with similar openings. If you play 2.c3 vs the Sicilian, then the Panov vs the Caro Kann or the Advance French will make sense. Sveshnikov has made a career of playing openings with similar pawn structures (which in turn dictate where your pieces go). Find a player like this (say Rosentalis or Rubelevshy) and study how they're middlegames flow right out of the opening.



  Popular posts by diarist
White Repetoire
opening repertoire for black
Kings Indian Vs Grunfeld
  | | | post reply

Related Products:
   Mastering The Chess Openings: Unraveling The Mysteries Of The Modern C...
   Mastering The Chess Openings Volume 2: Unlocking The Mysteries Of The ...
   Chess Openings 1

© 2010 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.