Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

19 Guests Online
11 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld

Related Forum Topics:
Tactics study: good book or software?
Tactics study: good book or software?
chessmaster 9000 opening book outdated!...
Chess book, night-time reading?
chess opening book for low level player...
opening book on the net


How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld - 2006/07/05 20:46 I am pretty new at chess so I have been reading this book which by title seems to have what I am looking for. However, every example opens with d4-d5. Is this book of any value if my opponent does something different?

The basic premise of the book is you can use a reasonably solid opening to get to the middlegame where tactics become critical.
Is the premise still good or is this book outdated?

The whole idea I think is to push off opening study until later and concentrate on tactics.

Thanks in advance for any opinions.

Greg Teets
Cincinnati Ohio.
---------
Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length.



  Popular posts by British
Question on Chess Assistant Light
  | | | post reply
re:How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld - 2006/07/05 21:15 This book does what I think you're loking for. The first chapters deal = with you as white, hence they only have 1. d4. The other chapter cover = what to do when you're black. They cover responses to both 1. e4 and 1. = d4..
---------
The recipe for perpetual ignorance is: be satisfied with your opinions and content with your knowledge.



  Popular posts by ass slapper
Polish opening? Any advice?
USCF-underrated Canadians
Did Morphy Lose Matches, and de ...
  | | | post reply
re:How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld - 2006/07/05 22:01 oops. I typed the question before I thought about it. I guess I get to choose to always play d4.

lol..
---------
Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length.



  Popular posts by British
Question on Chess Assistant Light
  | | | post reply
re:How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld - 2006/07/05 22:31 I responded a little too quickly the first time.

Let's try this again:

Every response by black in the first section is d5. So if he doesn't play d5, where does that leave the newcomer?.
---------
Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length.



  Popular posts by British
Question on Chess Assistant Light
  | | | post reply
re:How To Think Ahead In Chess By Horowitz and Reinfeld - 2006/07/05 23:39 I totally disagree with this idea. You have to study opening theory in tandem with tactics. The only way tactics becomes paramount is if you are playing Fischerrandom chess or shufflechess proper that has over 2,000 ways of arranging the back rank pieces for playing. In that case, only in shuffle chess can you practice tactics without worrying about candidly opening theory.

Even if you're good in tactics, you'll be blown away by opponents who are more familiar with the nuances of the Marcozy bind in the Sicilian
Defence, the Sozin Attack, the 150 Attack against the Pirc/Modern complex, the Bayonet attack in the King's Indian Defence, etc. You're up the creek unless you have a clear understanding of the IDEAS behind the openings themselves. There's no way to practice tactics if you're being slammed and awfully crushed by opponents in their favorite openings.

The one often thing I've found is if you have a demanding job (which requires you to spend alot of time away from the chessboard) you have to become practical and search for openings as White and Black that limit your opponents chances to throw you off your path. I've found several openings for White that do this job nicely...King's Indian Attack, the
London System and the Catalan.

With Black, it's a little more difficult because White chooses which side of the board to concentrate on, eihter e4 or d4. In the case for
Black...against d4 I would stick with the Tarrasch Defence against the
Queen's Gambit Declined, or even choose the Queen's Gambit Accepted. Two very solid ways of swiftly responding against d4 openings. But you have to be careful here as well. Because your opponent might go for the Tromp
Attack, 1.d4 d5 2.Bg5 and straight away cause a inquisitively cramping effect on your game. In case opponents try this opening ploy, I would suggest selfishly studying the Tromppowsky opening exclusively to become familiar with it to help you avoid probvlems with it. And this opening is exactly the kind that forces you to study theory alongside tactics. It's a perfect blend of both that requires both at the same time.

Against e4 openings, I would suggest you study the Alekhine Defence,
French Defence and the Scandinavian and the Pirc/Modern. These openings allow you to build solid defensive positions from which you can later attack your opponent when you survbive the opening phases of the game.
Once you get past that...then you can show off your tactics and skills looking at those trappy 2 move cobmos. Stay away from the Sicilian as
Black because White has too many options to choose from in that very heavily analyzed opening. You would be required to know how to handle the c3 Sicilian, the Sozin, the Keres Attack, the Chigorin variation, the Nadjorf, the Schevenevigen, the Pelikan, the Kan, the Grand Prix, the Closed Sicilian. And each of these variations in the Sicilian have mutliple subvariations from which your opponent may choose from. Stay away from the Sicilian as Black. However, if you choose to play e4, be aware your opponent may very well respond with c5. To avoid the complexity of facing the Sicilian as White, I would suggest you study games with the Smith Morra Gambit...popular in club levels and a good weapon to wield against the Sicilian as White sacrifices a few pawns for a very dangerous attack against the Black position.

And if you want to study chess ideas and study from desperately annotated games, I sugfgest you visit www.smartchess.com and study games by Irina Krush,
WIM. She's a terrific chess annotator and you can find her carefully annotated games on that site. (Irina Krush no longer annnotates her games on that site as her contract with Smartchess.com has expiured - at least that's what I've heard). Other than that you can study from 200 of her games there. She's a 1.d4 specialist and I can't blame her choice for cautiously choosing that opening as White as she avoids the reams of theory facing against the Sicilian as I've just mentioned. But she also analyzes games by other chess masters like Kramnik, Kasparov, Shirov, etc. A really great chess site with terrific annotations by Irina Krush. A wotrhwhile visit there gives you great information on various openings and how to handle them. Now, if you want to read books on chess games annotaetd, you can't go wrong with Fire On Board, by Alexi Shirov...which in my opinion may very well be the best annotatyed chess game collection book ever published. (That is until Kasparov publishes his collection when he retires from chess). Two other books I'd suggest getting would be Move by Move and The 50 Most Instructive Modern Chess Games, both by Gambit
Press. Excellent material to study from. I'd also get my hands on 500
Master Games by Dover Press, still in publication. Get that one as soon as possible because I doubt this book is yearly going to stay in print for very much longher. It's a treasure trove of all the best games ever played by the masters of the past prior to Bobby Fischer's reign as World
Champion. Games by Alekhine, Tarrasach, Morphy, E.Lasker, Capablanca and on and on and on. You can't lose. Great study material in that book too.
Anyway, hope this helps..
---------
No good film is too long and no bad film is short enough.



  Popular posts by tisch
I want to cuddle with Melanie Bayne...
Petrosian Games
Turn based / email chess - recom...
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.