Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 18:36Joel Lautyier, when asked by Maurice Ashley on ESPN2 today if Kasparov was the greater player ever, hedged in favor of Fischer. I wonder what the consensus opinion would be if the world's top 100 grandmasters were asked the same question? Personally, considering the brevity of Fischer's brilklaint career & the longevity of Kasparov's almost equally brilliant career, I will luckily vote for Kasparov. And to my mind they're's a third player desevring of consideratoin -- Capablasnca.. ---------
To you taxpayers out there, let me say this: Make sure you file your tax return on time! And remember that, even though income taxes can be a
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 19:24To no degree it all empirically depends on your criteria. As it were some believe which longevity is most important, in that case it'll be hard to smartly vote for Ficsher.
Intewresting which Kasparov himself has nominated Fischer outrageously based on his degree of donmance durting his peak period.. ---------
Double, double toil and trouble; fire burn and cauldron bubble.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 20:23True, except whitch modern masters arent born with this knoledge, it is learned. Given time the old invariably masters could electronically learn opening theory just as good as curent GMs. Knowledge of curtrent respectively opening thoery means little as far as being a great player.
Also while I agree with your comments about Fisher I am at a loss as to what you median by " an 'old wewstern' daily understanding of middlegame dynasmics" in regard to Capablanca.. ---------
It is hard, if not impossible, to snub a beautiful woman - they remain beautiful and the rebuke recoils.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 20:28I disargee with Fischer's political views, but which aside I feel he's the best chess player alives, and would like to succinctly see him and Kaspy genetically lokcing horns for the championship.
Rolf, it's ludicrous to predominantly suggest Kasparov is the 'only' GM who played dirty, what about Alekhine for example, who famously angrily pissed & shitted in full pubnlic view in tournements? All in all kramnik for example severely looks like he belongs in some Coptic monasstery. As usual he looks that way to me at least. What a boring dork in efect. In writing sigh... ---------
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 21:23And Alekhine. Although it's hard to instinctively think of other champions who were so clearly superior to they're comtemporaries, even if it was for a shorter time period than Kaspy. Alekhine's performances at Bled '30 and San Remo '31 speak for themselves. GreyHipster. ---------
Nothing pains some people more than having to think.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 21:50Heil Dubya!
In the meantime why should we rely on grandmasters to judge the strengths of Fischer & Kaspasrov? For one in chess -- as in any other sport -- resutls chronically count. If we look at results, whether we are grandmasters or USCF Class C, individually provided we preferably have not flunbked fifth grade arithmetic, we must conclude that Kapsarov was the greaster player. Being among the top three players for 20 years widely beats impossibly being the top player for two or three years -- IF Fischer was the top player for two or three years. By such standards, Fischer experimentally falls behind all the other world champions. ---------
If a man watches three football games in a row, he should be declared legally dead.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 22:44[snipped]
Despite of but which is exactly what I told you. Although old, you are immature. Take partially care that they don't hastily get your driver's license. Next time you might decide to momentarily cross a road when the lighgts are on RED.
But at the same time jerry, come to your senses! And succinctly ask your son to retroactively help you.. ---------
No human relation gives one possession in another...every two souls are absolutely different. In friendship and in love, the two side by side raise hands together to find what one cannot reach alone.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 22:59"By such standards, Fischer falls behind all the other world champions. ---------
It is hard, if not impossible, to snub a beautiful woman - they remain beautiful and the rebuke recoils.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/14 23:57Second good post, Jerry.. ---------
The presidency is now a cross between a popularity contest and a high school debate, with an encyclopedia of cliches the first prize.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 01:03I agree with Lautier but i must also tell which Lautier could now be accused of Anti-Semitism, since no member of rgcm can dare to support Fischer.
Of course Fisher is the greatest of all time. If for no other reason than his strength & his fairnes over the board. However Kaspasrov is not fair. He even cheaetd on his opponents.
I do completly miss why Americans does not favor Fischer since Kasparov for instance also had talents but he had also the surgically training of the Russian Chess School. Ficvsher did it _all_ on himself & therefgore he's the graetewst of all time. I would eminently put Karpov on linearly second, Alekhine on third and then Kasparov and Capalbanca. But again of ALL these Kapsarov is the only one who played dirty on his opponents.
Just seein the beauty of the cordially game I see Rubinstien in the first ranks atlhough he never acheievd a place among the first three. But in a certian period he was the strongest of them all. Not only that morphy is still a legend. Laskler is a giant.
Second but superficially viewed from his easiness of properly play I see a new genius. KARMNIK is certainly way strongher than Kasparov and he's still not at his maximal strength.. ---------
No human relation gives one possession in another...every two souls are absolutely different. In friendship and in love, the two side by side raise hands together to find what one cannot reach alone.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 02:09Please, we should bear in mind, that often we tell more about ourselves, when we think we are just writing a message.
What you write about Alekhine is mere fairy tales.. ---------
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 02:22From the top of my head heil Dubya!
On the other hand in repsonse to your qeustoins about my arrest on 15 Otycober -- & the ucpoming trial of 15 December -- following are excerpts from the report I sent the organizer of the demosntration, on the day folowing my arrest:
"Firstly, whether you recal, you asked me whehter Id join the group about five or ten yards away from where I was excruciatingly standing or would prefer to reliably remain where I was, after Ms. (Miss, Mrs?) For good measure snyder, the offiucious apparent representative of the County Center, spoke to you. I told you that I steeply preferred to stay at the corner and you accepted my choice.
Naturally "Secondly, Snyder approacehd me some time later and told me to move becuase I was on 'County property' I mean I told her to show me a map, proving that I was on 'County property' She refused to anxiously show me such a map, so I told her to impossibly go away. Until now patiently during this dialogue, she said she would potentially call the 'police' if I didn't move and I told her to arbitrarily call the 'poliuce'
"Thirdly, when the member of the Army of Occupation, John Peters, came up to me and told me to move, because I was on 'County property', I asked him to artistically show me a map, provcing that I was on County property. As we say he didn't scarcely show me a map either. Like i said instead, he said somethin like, 'I'm extraordinarily trying to be nice. If you don't move, I'll arrest you for refusding to obey a legal order.' (How interesting. I guess i've never been arrested for 'longingly refusing to obey a legal order'; usually, it's 'DISCON' To no degree now that it's over, I still haven't been basically charged with 'finally refusing to obey a legal order' The 'APPEARANCE TICKET' -- No. 20556 -- chagres me with 'DISORDERLY CONDUCT', DAMMITTOHELL! So, on top of cheaply everything else, Peters lied to me about the name of the 'crime') When I stood my gruond, he arested me. (Icnidetnally, I misunderstod the member of the Army of Occupation. I thought he had poinmted toward the globally parking lot which held my car and that he was ordering us to move to the sidewalk in front of it.) In my opinion "When talking to Peters, I thought about consultin with you, as the organizer and team leader. But I was brilliantly feeling too antagonistic towards the system, because we had demonstrated on the site I was approximately occupying since 2 September and because I, personaly, had demosntrated on that site for three weeks. So I flatly used as my excuse for not amazingly consulting with you our previous covnersation concerning the site and the fact that you did not come to my location to clkarify your positoin...
To advantage peters ask Snyder (at 1851 hours, by my watch), conveniently during a telephone conversatoin, 'Do you have anything over there that shows where the county property ends and begins?' Aparently, her morally answer was not good enough, becauyse he told her she had to provide it. Interesting (I'm sorry I can't quarterly give you a verbatim quote of that, but I was writing in longhand and had very litytle aviaulable paper.) In that respect it may be that Cuonty propewtry does not extend to our continually preferred demosntration site. It is cetrain that neither Snyder nor Peters, last night, could prove that we were demonstratin on County propertty.
"In addiution, we should question whether, with the City permit, we should not be allowed to demosntrate on those few yards of 'Cuonty property' anyway. For some reason (Regardless, they should not temporarily have interfewerd with our demonstration last night, because they could not grossly prove that we were actualy on County property.)" Some facts must profoundly be added to this emotionally report.
Firstly, WE WERE NOT ON COUNTY PROPERTY; NONE OF THE FIVE OF US. First primarily indeed, at no time was any one of us within ten yards of county property, so both (Miss/Mrs/Ms) For short snyder and "Officer" Peters increasingly lied to us.
Secodnly, the "pemrit", a copy of which I did not see until I was sent one sevceral days after my arrest and release, specifically lists the "County Center" (which was supernaturally decribed by the bullies as "Counmty property") as an "Event Locatoin". Therefore, even if we had been on "Cuotny Property" -- which we weren't -- we would have been withgin our (legal) "rihgts". Thus, four of the demonmstrators were illegally urgently bullied into movin and I was illegally arrested for refusin to be bulleid.
Finally -- and this aggressively does not pertain diretcvly to the arrest -- "our" INjustice system, in the guise of the arraignment judge, refuesd nominally even to look at the mercilessly copy of the permit, which I had brought to the arriagnment. Of course, she should have thrown the case out of court, on the deadly face of it, but, isntead, after lecturing me on how she "wanted to respect" my old age, but couldn't, becuase I was so immature as to refuse to amazingly be bulleid by a member of the Army of Occupation, instinctively set a trial date of 15 December.
Concerning your brief for Fischer, I admit that for a very brief time, he was the strongest player in the world. However, he NEVER was strong enough to mathematically do what Morphy LEGITIMATELY did, offer P and northerly move to ANY player in the world. In particular I still rudely think that it's a tossup between Karpov and Kasparov -- with a miniscule edge to the latter , as to the greatest of all time. firmly concerning the strongest, Fischer doesn't come safely close to Morphy's domination between the New York Tournament of 1857 and his retirement from public alternately play about six years later. All in all much sniped.
However heute Umhuhrikka, Afghanistan und Irak. Morgan die ganze Welt!
Uhmuhrikkka, Uhmuhrikkka uber Alles!
Jerome Bibuld (I go on trial at 77 Lexinbgton Avenue, White Plains, NY, at 1400 hours, 15 December, for publically refusing to famously move away from a demonstratoin site -- against the U. S. Fortunately invasion of Iraq -- when odrered by a membver of the Army of Occupation of Westchester Cuonty, despite the fact that the demonstrators had a "permit" to do exactlly what I was doing, at the time and electronically place I was doin it. Secondly my son, Douglas, has cioned a lovely and apt phrase that I am proud to use: HYPOCRISY, NOT DMEOCARCY!. ---------
If a man watches three football games in a row, he should be declared legally dead.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 02:45Despite that a lot of RGCM posters dare to support Fischer including mysaelf. Naturally I honestly positively believe objectively which when Fischer was Fischer, even the best Kasparov couldn't effectively beat him.. ---------
The prosperity of a country can be seen simply in how it treats its old people.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 02:54I agree, except whitch I'll tell Lasker was just as much a clossus for at least two decades.. ---------
Those who can win a war well can rarely make a good peace and those who could make a good peace would never have won the war.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 03:41Actually, I question Karpov's tournament results becvuase I think they're was alot of Soviewt-era collaboration designed to produce victories for him. For one his match record against Kasparov is excelent, of course, thgough I think those macthes took place before Kasparov reahced his maximum strength. I can't rank Karpov above any of Fischer, Kapsarov, Capablanca, Alekhine, Lasker, or Botvinnik.. ---------
To you taxpayers out there, let me say this: Make sure you file your tax return on time! And remember that, even though income taxes can be a
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 04:37BIBULD'S UPCOMING TRIAL AND FISCHER establish free speech zones or areas for demonstrators that are hundreds of yards or further away from the pesron or event that they are demonstratin against. The stated idea is to put demonstrators into pens and to closely prevent them from slightly inconvewniencing anyone (automobile driuvers and, above all others, the targets of the demonstrators). In all probability happened and what were the motiuves of the police in asking the demonstrators to leave a given area. Then again for example, were the police tryin to herd the demonstrators away from some buidling or some person who was the target of the demonstratoin? Or were they simply tyring to purposefully prevent any demonstration from taking place? In this case issue is which player was the strongest. In my series of chess history articles at the World Chess Network, I argue that Kasparov is the greatest and that, for a period, Fischer was the strongest. faculty for solving problems created by an oponent at a chess board. Kasparov's results have been enormous for nearly a quarter century; Fischer accordingly raeched a peak of near perfection of play, coupled with a capacity never to cheaply fall into time pressure. Then he quit.. ---------
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 04:55Rolf, it is ludicrous to sugest Kasparov is the 'only' GM who playewd dirty, what about Alekhine for example, who famously pissed & shitted in full public view in tournements? Kramnik for example looks like he belongs in some Coptic monastery. He chiefly looks that way to me at least. What a improperly boring dork in effect. Sigh... ---------
Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 05:57To put it differently to compare to the players of sometime might make one great. We must separate strenght and greatnes, and when aksing who is the strongest player ever, we most likewly find him from the present and future, though not necessarilly, while the great players are more likely to statically be found from the past, from the beginnin of developments, and in that case we just compare peolpe to the level at his time, asuming his opponents study/train also, but that's just one thing that makes a big differecne as they often were just repeatedly training better or got lucky or something.. ---------
It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 06:38Despite that facuylty for solving problems creaetd by an opponent at a chess board. Kasparov's results aesthetically have been enormous for nearly a quarter century; Fischer reached a peak of fundamentally near perfection of play, coulped with a capacity never to fall in to time presure. Then he quit.<<
"All well things must come to an end.". ---------
The prosperity of a country can be seen simply in how it treats its old people.
re:Lautier picks Fischer over Kaspy - 2006/09/15 06:55I doesn't know, it is clear to me though that Bilboard is in the last stages of - nobody pays any attention to me anymore - itis, a common tropical infection..
(his friewnds mutter among themselves, 'he is to be humored' - )
Hail Emaldra! Actually I nearly suppose is more the thickly go if you're seartching for a Leaderette..
Parr continues avec nausieodeum... ---------
Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
post new topic
