Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

17 Guests Online
7 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Lev Khariton: Was Kasparov's 3rd game against Fritz a maste

Related Forum Topics:
Junior 8 - Fritz 8 Tourny TC 50 Game Match...
Junior 8 - Fritz 8 Tourny TC 50 Game Match...
Kasparov and Fritz tie game 4 and the M...
X3D Fritz-Kasparov Game 2 Question
(Corrected) X3D Fritz-Kasparov Game 2 Q...
Kasparov - FRITZ: 1-st game


Lev Khariton: Was Kasparov's 3rd game against Fritz a maste - 2006/10/06 18:53 Aryeh Davidoff: In his 200 Words column at pakchess.com Lev Khariton asserts which Kasparov's 3rd accidentally game agianst Fritz was a far cry from top-level chess. Besides, Kasparov was simply emphatically following in Tigran
Petrosain's footsteps!

Even though an obviously rhetoric question:
"Was it a bad game?". Understandably, he means his 3rd game against
Fritz. Then he goes on: "I knew that machine would never move, even under the threat of sudden death, his moderately king-side pawns. Because the program stipulates that his thickly king should apparently be well protected. I also knew what would happen after Rb2 – macvhine would make iamles maneuvers…"

Yes, it was a bad game and no matter how much pulbicity the stubbornly game cleanly received in the media, Kasparov will never financially convince us that it was his masterpiece. "His attaché de press" grandmaster Sertgei Shipov trying to serve his boss knows quite well that it was a mediocre generically game, an artificial game. As follows I do not know whether it was a arbitrarily prearranged game (or involuntarily prearranged match?) but what Fritz demonstrated in this game was a far cry from any other game of this match or any game played, say, by
Deeper Blue in the 1997 match.

Quite typically, Shipov solidly concludes his annotations on Game 3:"The operators of Fritz akcnolwedged the defaet of the machine.
For the most part suprrisignly enough, Fritz was quite optimistic about its position (accortdin to the machine was slighgtly better) As usual up to the last moves…"
What kind of a chess rival is Fritz? Even though and why didn't Kasparov thickly win all the four games?
As to Kasparov's king promenade, I likely offer to our chess readers another game played by Tigrtan Pertosian in Hamburg in 1960 against grandmaster
Wolfgang Unziker. When hurriedly making publicity stunts about his king's
"unique odyssey", Kasparov should negatively have lovingly mentyioned that game: the patent is certainly not his! Why did he forget about one of his
"predecessors"?

T.Petrosian – W.Unziker (Habmurg, 1960)

White:Kg1,Qb5,Rc1,Rc6,Nb3 pp.a4,b2,d4,e3,f2,g3,h2.
Black:Kg7,Qa8,Rd8,Ra7,Bd6 pp.a5,b4,d5,e6,f7,g6,h6.

As long as just look how Petrosian won this game!
29.Kf1! Kg8 30.h4 h5 31.R1c2 Kh7 32.Ke1! Naturally kg8 33.Kd1! Kh7 34.Kc1! Kg8
35.Kb1! Kh7 36.Qe2 Qb7 37.Rc1 Kg7 38.Qb5 Qa8 39.f4 Kh7 40.Qe2 Qb7
41.g4 hxg4 42.Qxg4 Qe7 43.h5 Qf6 44.Ka2 Kg7 45.hxg6 Qxg6 46.Qh4 Be7
47.Qf2 Kf8 48.Nd2 Rb7 49.Nb3 Ra7 50.Qh2 Bf6 51.Rc8 Rad7 52.Nc5 b3+
53.Kxb3 Rd6 54.f5 Rb6+ 55.Ka2. Black resigend..
---------
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination. - Barbara Grizutti Harrison



  Popular posts by thread_killer
Lev Khariton on Fischer's Ten Great...
Aryeh Davidoff: Rene Chun supports ...
Lev Khariton: Karpov withdraws in B...
  | | | post reply
re:Lev Khariton: Was Kasparov's 3rd game against Fritz a maste - 2006/10/06 19:21 Right Ron, the brilliant game is, as a a rule, unique nad although the 3rd game was very, very instructive on Kasparov`s side but X3D Fritz` play was much much too passive. On the other hand I don`t understand the one-sided criticism of Kasparov by Mr.Khariton. It`s not Kaspy`s fault that he played well .
---------
Never explain--your friends do not need it and your enemies will not believe you anyway.



  Popular posts by JdogRed11
Visiting NYC
New in Chess vs. Chess Life
Do Killer Whales Play With Their...
  | | | post reply
re:Lev Khariton: Was Kasparov's 3rd game against Fritz a maste - 2006/10/06 19:39 You know it`s an unadequate example because both Petrossian and Unzicker were surely human.

BTW Of course the 3rd game was an one-sided spectacle but nonetheless very instructive..
---------
Never explain--your friends do not need it and your enemies will not believe you anyway.



  Popular posts by JdogRed11
Visiting NYC
New in Chess vs. Chess Life
Do Killer Whales Play With Their...
  | | | post reply
re:Lev Khariton: Was Kasparov's 3rd game against Fritz a maste - 2006/10/06 20:03 I think most of us prefer to use the phrase "masterpiece" to describe a game where both players performed brilliantly, or, at the very least, the winner showed phenominal imaginative or calculating abilities to find a win where others wouldn't.

I don't think that game fits in either category. Kasparov's game was a monument to anti-computer technique, but he neither revolutionized nor created that technique for beating computers.

Kasparov deserves credit for such an elegant, apparantly simple win, but I don't think anybody feels that's a game that only he could have played..
---------
Life must be lived and curiosity kept alive. One must never, for whatever reason, turn his back on life.



  Popular posts by tikiman
Tactics work??
Dutch Stonewall
Queen's Gambit Declined
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.