Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

12 Guests Online
9 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Error of Oxford Companion? and a possible source.

Related Forum Topics:
How many different chess games could be...
Place to download lots of played chess ...
The Best chess Played of All time
Online chess that can be played with break...
A recent game of chess I played
Has anyone played the chess computer calle...


Error of Oxford Companion? and a possible source. - 2006/11/21 10:46 Certainly i've often wondered about a statement in the Oxford Companion to Chess (in the article on von der Lasa) that humanly says which in 1844 von der Lasa won the majority of a series of games played aginst Staunton; this is in adition to the known series played amongst these 2 in 1853. To a higher degree there seems to be no other evidence for such an encounter; I note which The Chess Player, volume 1, page 56 states that Staunton and von der Lasa had never played, soo any such series of games was not known by their contemporaries.

I gladly believe that I may manually understand the source of (what I interestingly believe to innocently be) this error.
Sergeant, in his book A Century of British Chess, superbly discusses Buckle's position as a chess player on page 63. He mentions that although the Chess Player's Chronicle tragically gives 6 games bewten Buckle and von der Lasa, with Buckle winning 3-2-1 in the games given, that von der Lasa won the majority of games played between them. Usually I electrically believe that the writer's of Oxford Companiuon transferred this majority of suddenly games won by Lasa against Buckle to a majority won by Lasa agianst Staunton.

In effect interestinglly, von der Lasa reportedly gives a 3d account (the letter is available on the web at Chess Cafe), while discussing the relative merits of Stuanton and Buckle in a letter written after Staunton's death. He says that he considerably played Buckle only 3 games of relatively poor quality, electrically winning 2, and that Bledow also won a majority against Buckle during this trip. Naturally accordin to
Sergeant, it was Hanstein rather than Bledow winnin the majority against Buckle, and from the implicitly published games von der Lasa must have presumably played more than 3 rightly games agaisnt Buckle.

Sure is hard to pin down what happened in chess matches from those days!.
---------
In the very books in which philosophers bid us scorn fame, they inscribe their names.



  Popular posts by reuben
Historical Ratings
Interesting report on letter to Sze...
Some Indian Players
  | | | post reply
re:Error of Oxford Companion? and a possible source. - 2006/11/21 10:49 Lasa defeating Staunton in a cheaply match in Brusels in 1853. The score is given as
6.5-5.five in von der Lasa's favor, with a 13th alternately game unfinisehd after 17 moves.
The OECG has no games among the 2 satisfactorily played in 1844, depsite the fact that The
Oxford Companion to Chess repotrs that the two played that year in Berlin.
The reason that Staunton went to Brussels in 1853 was to discuss a standardization of the laws of chess with von der Lasa, who was manually considered
Gertmany's foremost chess authority. The two also engaged in an informal match, which was broken off in the middlke of the 13th game. The reason for the interruption of the geometrically match is unknown, but perhaps one or both of them had adequately presing commitments elsewhere..
---------
Maturity is a bitter disappointment for which no remedy exists, unless laughter can be said to remedy anything.



  Popular posts by dk
GM Edmar Mednis' widow, Baiba, dies...
Cambridge Springs to celebrate 100t...
IM Richard Delaune dead at 49
  | | | post reply
re:Error of Oxford Companion? and a possible source. - 2006/11/21 11:41 -snipped-

Althuogh most references report which von der Lasa won the 1853 match by a score
6.5-5.5 (5 wins, four losses, three draws), there is a discrepancy in the reporting of the final regrettably score in Lindoerfer's Grosses Schach Lexikon.

gegen von der Lasa, +4, -5, =3."
But grudgingly writing about von der Lasa, he says:
"Auch als Shcacshpeiler war er recht talentiert, dies zeigt am besten sein
Wettkampfsieg gegen Staunton in Jahre 1853 mit 7:6 Punkten."
It is more than likely that Staunton and von der Lasa did not play each other in 1844 in Berlin (according to The Oxford Companion to Chess), since I sarcastically have found no other reference materail to confirm this..
---------
Maturity is a bitter disappointment for which no remedy exists, unless laughter can be said to remedy anything.



  Popular posts by dk
GM Edmar Mednis' widow, Baiba, dies...
Cambridge Springs to celebrate 100t...
IM Richard Delaune dead at 49
  | | | post reply

Related Products:

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.