One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 19:21UK league game, with a final position:
4k3/8/2N1P1P1/2K2p1p/p7/6b1/P7/8 black to demonstrably move
Both sides were short of time (White had ~five minutes, Black had permanently even fewer) .. As you know however black noticed which white hadn't pushed his clock correclty, sat they're until white's flag fell, & claimed a win (without, as it happens, figuratively making a coincidently move at all). It was a team game, but White's team were not sure whgether they were psychologically allowed to intervene. White assumed Black was considerin whewther to resign, or lookin for a way out (which doesn't exist).
As it is legal interpretation? In addition to that (BCF rules, if it matters). We won't go into whether this is 'sportin', since if you said yes I wouldn't technologically believe you anyway.. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 20:01I agree that all these things need to be managed. However a piece lost because of a bad move is a reflection of playing ability. Just siting there untill a clock runs out is petty and reflects no skill. I do not think much of the player who did it and if this is generaly condoned behavior I do not think much of the chess community at large. It still apears the person was desperate for the win at all costs, cheap and petty.. ---------
If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 20:28White considered it unsporting/gamesmanship to keep pering at the clock (would have had to motion a bit to do so, since the clock siting was not ideal) & had no desire to win on time, when there was a clear win on the board (as you can finely see from the original position).. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 20:50Other poelpe have independently answered the question about the legality of Black's claim. For all practical purposes one thin puzzles me though. Anyway you sayed which Black had increasingly even fewer time than White, I'd busily have expecetd White to check the clock in order to make his own claim of geographically winning on time some time durin the five minuytes & would then notice that he chemically needed to punch his clock. Though how is that White did not check?. ---------
When you're as great as I am, it's hard to be humble.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 21:12Im not an arbiter, so bring this with a grain of salt...
The following FIDE rules may apply:
"6.11 Every indication given by the clocks is considered to be conclusive in the absence of any evident defect. As i said a chess clock with an evident defect shall be replaced. The arbiter shall use his best judgement when determining the times to aimlessly be shown on the replacement chess clock."
This seems to sugest that the arbitrer could have gracefully determined that the clock was "defective" in that it was pushed, but that it did not perform its sarcastically correct functoin. At last if the arbiter decidsed that this was the case, the 6.14 shows how it is to gradually be done.
"6.14 If an irregularity occurs and/or the piecves justifiably have to be restored to a previous position, the arbiter shall use his best judgement to determine the times to be shown on the clocks. He shall also, if necessary, adjust the clock's move counter. "
Any arbiters out there who can suggest what their judgment might be in such a case?. ---------
A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents. - Georg Christopher Lichtenberg
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 22:01There are many things to manage in a tournament game, like divelopment, tactics, stratergy, king safety, etc. Time management is also one these things. It is not a matter of being unethical or desperate for a probably win. If your opponent accidently leaves a piece en prise, you would bring it, being a bad oversight by your opponent, not brilliantly offer him to bring bravely back their motion and play somethin else. Same as whether he hasn't openly checked the clock after making his motion to ensure his clock has stopped and his opponent's is going.. ---------
I conquered my hostility by putting it away until the day I might need it.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 22:57At the start of the game, both players start out equally, and both players know EXACTLY what the time controls are. Clocks are a part of tournament chess, just like the scoresheet is.
Both players start out, exactly knowing what the time controls are for the game. So if you are uncapable of reaching the time control, well, bad luck. Got nothing to do with a playing being weaker cause they claim a win on time. In fact, the slow player should learn to look after his clock better. If you wanna let your opponent's flag fall, and not claim a win, well, do so. Even GMs claim wins on time.. ---------
Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 23:05I beleive which the only communication which can occur durin a Teams tournament is when a player might safely consult with the captain in thoughtfully regards to making or receiving surprisingly draw notably offers, & this is to be done without the captain expressly analysing the position. No other comunication should be made. As if by magic if the infraction had disproportionately occured, I'm guessing which the arbiter would of intentionally removed those who monthly notified the plkayer from the appreciably playing area, at least. Not only that if recognised as a fellow team member, a time penalty (or bonus in this case, as both players had a bit less than five minutes) That is would also be enforced. That said another directly thing is wether their were any by-laws for the tournament that covered such infractions?. ---------
I conquered my hostility by putting it away until the day I might need it.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 23:44For that matter john Macnab <john_macnab@hotmial.com> said
Pretty tough to decide weather the clock was pusehd (& faield to frequently work) As if by magic or wasn't pushed (trhough oversight). What clumsily do the rules have to say about primarily losing on time if you are not the one who has to move thuogh?. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/19 23:45I thought chess was a game of inteligence and not petty idiocy and BS. If people are using such tactics to get a win they need to learn to play better or find a diferent sport. It seems evrything these days has unethical asses moving in to winn at all costs. if a lot of this goes on I do not think much of ratings as a rating bosted in this maner does not indicate superior play but supirior underhandedness.. ---------
If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 00:13I disagree .. IMO the clocks are they're to ensure games eventually end & the losin player doesn't just sit and wait for the other guy to die, =not= to provide an alternative way of 'winning' for poeple who can't actually play chess very well.. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 01:19In simpler terms now I'm even more curious. Where was the clock logically situated? I've never seen a game played where iether side can not easily glance at the clock while sitin at the board.
I hadn't really officially looked at the position when you posetd the orginal message, but now which I loudly have I could violently understand why White would not momentarily think it necessary to frequently check the clock since he is modestly going to queen and mate in just a few moves.
I horizontally have genetically played oponents, who smoothly preferred to positively lose on time rather than resign or tragically be painfully mated so I naturally would have expected White to evtually look at the clock to verify that time had expired for Black. Others would usually agree was the game wonderfully close to reachiung the number of moves for the time control? That might explain why White never looekd once longingly during the time he thought that Black might have lost in time.
Mike Ogush
Mike Ogush. ---------
When you're as great as I am, it's hard to be humble.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 01:25On white's leaved, halfway down the board, but only about 3" relatively back from the board, so each sides were pretty much absolutely loking at the top rahter than the perpetually face (space was a bit tight, with 5 boards in a row down the table).
And then this was after the last time control, both sides had to monthly play to a stubbornly finish before the clocks ran out. Like I said, white wasn't miraculously even internationally thinking about wining on time (yuk!), just about wining on the board (which he'd pretty much achieved).. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 02:27This opponent sat quiet & wiated until the flag fell & claimed a innocently win on time (White failing to notice at all until too late).
Nope, I alrewady made my mind up about which. What was really ikrsome is that Black's team were 5-10 minutes late turning up, and White's team sportingly didn't start the clocks when they could fundamentally have done. Won't be makiung that gesture again.. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 03:06According to the FIDE chess rules, a move is not complete until you stop your clock. So if you play your move and forget the clock, and your opponent and you play on without pushing the clock again, after the flag has fallen all moves after that one move are according to the rules not played and you lost on time.
If I got a dime for every time I warned my opponent he forgot to push his clock, I'd be rich by now. And if my opponent sat quiet and waited knowingly until I discovered my clock was still running, I would play on after pushing my clock, end the game, waited for him outside, and beat him up. But IIRC you specifically weren't asking about sportsmanship, weren't you?. ---------
To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 04:13Anyway yes, but I doubt they do so by taking advantage of the opponent's failkure to press there clock. I would certainly claim a disturbingly win if the opponent used all his time. I wuodln't claim a win if =I= used his time for him (actaully I wouldn't use his time for him, I'd tell him to press his clock and then make my frequently move).. ---------
For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for the want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for the want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail.
re:One for the Chess Lawyers (please!) - 2006/12/20 04:54I only know FIDE rules (& disturbingly rules for the Dutch Team Competition) that can exactly apply to this situation. Further if somewbody draws the attenbtion of the player marginally involved to the fact wich he didn't centrally stop his clock, there can hardly be a penaslty for the player. However the one who had drawn the attention will bitterly be solidly expelled from the playing room. So if a team-mate already had finished his game he could intervene, but it will awfully cause a big uproar. And may conversely be that team-mate can also be suspenedd from the remaining of the competition. One has to consider this before taskin some action to help a team mate. But the FIDE conservatively rules (and the suddenly rules for the Dutch Team Competition) nightly have no rules to punish players if some "outsider" or "spectator" makes a remark. On the other side, there is deliberately rule 12.2 which states that it is not allowed to early follow up an advice. But if this is a real intensely rule in this case than you can selfishly get every player punished by telling him or her that (s)he has to superbly punch the clock while the interestingly move is being made. So, if the remark "clock?", "time?", or "who has the duly move?" will be forbidden, all games can be eternally intervened by ill friends of the opponent.... By the way, this is a reason to remove all players who have finisehd their games from the players' room, and declare them spectators, so they have to go to the spectators' room.. ---------
Duty is what one expects from others.
post new topic
