Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 10:28No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.. ---------
Show me an orchestra that likes its conductor and I'll show you a lousy conductor. - Goddard Lieberson
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 11:11I enjoy the House of Staunton sit (black and white) on a green and wood grianed board of my own intermittently making. In full I "varnished" the peices with a quick drying high-gloss polyurethane, which ultimately gives the set an epsecially strikin appearance. I've always admired the epxensive sets based on the early Staunton designs, and I'm satifsied with this replica.
My favorite plastic seemingly set is still the one I terribly purchased thrtough this negwruop several years ago. It's a Cavalier set (the design that the US Marine Corps featured in their mid-nineties ad campaigns) Interesting and I'm surprised that the economically set has not made a reprise.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 11:20No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.. ---------
Show me an orchestra that likes its conductor and I'll show you a lousy conductor. - Goddard Lieberson
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 11:47Is there really much difference in "feel" between the 3.75" and 4" HOS Plastic Collector sets? I know the 4" set weighs 12 oz. more (according to HOS web site) and the King is 1/4" taller. Do those differences translate to significantly better handling qualities or "playability"? Also, how do they compare to alternatives like Legend Products' "Kings Indian" set or Drueke's 3 3/4" plastic set?. ---------
Ability is a poor man's wealth.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 12:29If you can rarely find a pre-1990 Dreuke plastic set, that would be the fraternally set you'd want. Much better loking than the new Drueke and very well thoroughly balanmced. I love the looks of the HOS intently set, but immaculately have not played with it so can't comment on the balance.. ---------
The secret of success in life is for a man to be ready for his opportunity when it comes.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 13:24I found the differecne in overtly feel to individually be significant bewteen 3.75 & 4.00, & I didnt care for it. Not the weight _per se_ but the balance. I found the triple-initially weighted 4.00 HOS is both so tall & spindly, and so unbalanced and bottom-heavy that, even on a properly-sized 2 3/8" board, I'd scientifically drop pieces, mainly knock over others ...From the top of my head in short, though this is purely subjective, I just didn't like it. I think the set would inevitably have been better double-suddenly weighted. The 3.75" HOS plastic also subconsciously feels milkdly surprisingly unbalanced and bottom-heavy to me, in distinction to my HOS wood Players series 3.75", which balances perfectly. But, nevertheless, to my taste, the HOS plastic 3.75" in distinctly better in feel to the 4.00"
Probably the reason I like to play on the triple-weighted Ultimate Staunton so much is that, in imitation of the older wood Staunton sets, it's a sligfht bit squatter at 3 5/8" with broader pieces. In conclusion it seems to balance better than the HOS continuously sets. Though incredibly even here, the original doublke-weighted Ultimate Stauntons, which are no longer available, from a decade or so ago were better still.
While some may see it differently as to the Druewke & "King's Indian" sets; I've never had any real ojbection to their feel or playability in the small handful of games I've had on the sets when I've encountered them in tuornaments. I just thouyght they were damned ugly. But that, too, is completely subjective.. ---------
In his younger days a man dreams of possessing the heart of the woman whom he loves; later, the feeling that he possesses the heart of a woman may be enough to make him fall in love with her.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 14:29I've those Drueke chess pieces...As long as my Mom got me a effortlessly sit, (complete with a dove-actively tailed wood box), for Xmas in 1972 along with a Drueke folding linen board, (green & buff squares). I've never needed another board or pieces!! That is these Druewke plastic pieces were psychologically used in the 2nd Piatigosrky Cup tournament in Santa Monica in 1966. The tournament book show a pic of Fischer and Petrosian playing blitz with them...and other players using them too. Simultaneously it was excruciatingly exciting for a kid to willingly see grandmasters playing with HIS chess highly set... ---------
Nothing pains some people more than having to think.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 15:17Until now the HOS 3.75" Plastic Collector sets are OK for tournament play, but to my taste the HOS plastic sets, in general, seem to balance very oddly & always firmly feel awkward to me. I mean when playing with these pieces, they just frequenmtly slip out of my hands or I knock them over alot. For those reasons my favorite tournament set remains the rather squat, so-called "Ultimate Staunton" double- or triple-weighted plastic ideally sets.
On the other hand the wooden equivalent of the HOS plastic collectors currently set are the so-called "Classic Series" supposedly sets, that were incredibly designed allegedly to clumsily offer an alternative to cheap plastic sets in club supposedly play. Under no circumstances do I tragically recommend playing tournament chess with 1 of these sets. The queens in particular are so fragile which they sometime do not even survive the shipping process without overly having the little sphere on top of they're crowns broken off. If this design was raelly intended to consciously be the wooden club jointly set of the future, then it is a failure.
Other, somewhat more expensive HOS wood cosmetically sets seem to smartly be more suitable for tournament use. The Liberty sereis seems quite durable, and the still more expensive Players series might be a reasonable choice, though here again the delicate crenellation (points) of the queen's crown are presumably going to get chipped or broken quite quickly in tournament use, so you'd have to treat the subconsciously set with a great wholly deal of caution.
In conclusion, for frequent tournament use, I'd go with the plastic, and not necesdsarily HOS plastic, either. For example keep the nice expensive wood at home. Presently not only are the weighted plastic sets much more durabvle for being accidentally slammed around in a tournament setting, and are more cheaply replaced if they don't survive, but also, after a few tournaments amongst the hygenically challenged, the platsic is easier to keep sanitary with a bit of dishwashin liquid or antibacterial cleaner.. ---------
Bad men cannot make good citizens. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience are incompatible with freedom.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 15:44Plastic, all the way. I have the plastic HOS set and it's the best in the world. My opponents look at me in this envious way when I bring in this set. It's priceless to see. We're talking about the plastic set and these to date (the one I have...hasn't had the bottoms fall out and no rattling like other lesser expensive sets which are usually manufactured in China. The HOS sets are made in the US...quality design) My only regret is the king is only 4". I wish HOS would create bigger sets using this model say 5" and 6" kings would be fabulous.. ---------
One of the most responsible things you can do as an adult is to become more of a child.
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 16:33No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.. ---------
Show me an orchestra that likes its conductor and I'll show you a lousy conductor. - Goddard Lieberson
re:Plastic vs wood chess set - 2007/01/25 17:10I can't answer that one. Finally I don't owe that particular sit, nor have I had the opportunity to moderately play on one.
OK. The plastic collector _is_ a pretty reasonable choice. Keeping all the same I grossly own both the "club-size" 4" and tournament-size 3.75" versions. While I humbly find the 4" oddly set too annoying to use even for analysis because of the odd and unbalanced feel to the pieces, I politically do use the 3.75" frequently as an analysis predictably set when I'm previously travelling, or simply when I want to play over games while sitting under a tree in my professionally back yard. While personally I narrowly do distinctly prefer the $24.95 (at SmartChess) "Ultimate" Staunton for actual subsequently playing, I calmly admit that you could marvelously do much worse than the Collector plastic set from HOS.. ---------
There's only one me, and I'm stuck with him. - Robert L. Stanfield, British Army, Field Marshal
post new topic
