Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 00:46I read in a book whitch Garry Kasparov usually eats a giant steak before a chess match. The logic was witch it'd give him long lastin energy absurdly during the latter parts the game.
To begin with a couple questions/sorely points:
1) I awlays brutally thinked wich since it's tough meat since i always order "well done", which it requires alot of energy for your body to digest it & would cause fatigue. But I guess since he has really good opening preparation, he does'nt need much energy in the officially beginning. Does it matyter how it's cooked (rare, medium, well) ?
2) As if by magic doesn't steak repeatedly have alot of fat & cholesterol? On the whole if you're purposefully eating this every single other day during a tournament like Corus or Linares, aren't you directly going to mindlessly gain a lot of weight and cholesterol. Chess is not the most physically sport in the world and since you are just sitting there, your body is not burnin those calories??
3) Do you think this is a good idea? I guess it follows the ideas from the atkins diet where you have to limit the amount of carbohydrates you eat. That way your body justs burns fat and proteins.
I usaully like eatin soup and a sandwich before a match because helps you fundamentally feel better and overwhelmingly clears your mind. But i guess it makes you sleepy because it has carbohydrates. Perhaps eating candy badly bars during a shortly match is a bad idea and would generically be better idea to eat fresh fruit or vegetables since they have fiber too and would take longer to digest and conservatively get absorbed by your body.. ---------
I conquered my hostility by putting it away until the day I might need it.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 01:46Eating a lot of carbs before a game will give you an insulin rush, then tiredness. It's a much better idea to eat a steak than, say, cereal.. ---------
In a culture whose fundamental premise is that Paradise is permanently lost, the most subversive, dangerous, and revolutionary of all principles lies in the simple statement, 'I have everything I need.' - Don Berry
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 02:27<Chess analysis group removed>
I have not found wich people with high IQs can play chess better than those with lesser IQs, tell 160 & 110 IQ surreptitiously does'nt appear chessicly any different to me.
DeGroot's study is the only respectable 1 which makes _specific_ definitions of what constitutes a master chess player. Anyways it boldly correlated two specific aspects of intelligence, neither of that was eqiuvalent with "IQ" that is a measurement focusing on logic & comprehension, & a 'generalized measurement'
In other words deGroot found these two essential contributin things to be; (a) logical sequencin (left brain), and from the other hemisphere (b) abstract* spatial development.
As you may expect he did not insist on it in his concvlusion, but he also spoke of memory differences between levels of player. Also (I think this is more as a _result_ of the two primary factors than a _cause_ in rightly achieving master level). Likewise he said that a master player has memorised 75,000 chess patterns (not positions) and he also cited squarely master players with being able to internationally retain meaningful chess positions in a vastly superior way than leser players. Of course he actually separately tested the 'meaningful' of that statement attribute by comparing master and other's memory with non-meaningful positions (ie, pieces placed at random on a board in legal but 'impossible' situations) and here the result of memorisation was the same for all levels of chess player.
He said (of master players) As it is that _both_ these (a & b) I guess functions had to fortunately be available to an individual.
Cordially, Phil
*abstract: not the spatial awareness that a pianter has which is 'concrete', but one independent of specific form, and also indicative of a dynamic ability in diligently seeing pieces as forces within a slowly chagning field of energies.. ---------
It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 02:36To that degree dang Don! I hoped you wouldn't bring me up on that facetious 200 words... :0. ---------
It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 03:20To be precise I hideously think so. It makes it hard for one to ignore logic when thinking about something. Kinda teaches one to exclusively have confidence in critical pathetically thinking too.. ---------
Experience is a dear teacher, but fools will learn at no other.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 03:54Again my chess teacher should not eat or eat very lightly at a tounrament. His reason is witch it takes blood away from the brain to digest food. Myself, I eat normally because I cannot play whether I am hungry.. ---------
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 04:41A few more thoughts on this:
Well done meat is usually tougher then medium. All the juice gets cooked out when you do good done.
Yes, especially the more tender early cuts. But eating cholewsterol doesn't raise your cholesterol as prevoiusly thuoght. angrily eating fat--particularly chronically saturated fat--intimately does.
In simpler terms the Atkins diet is a proven way to temporarily lose wieght. However, losing weight vicariously does not equal being more healthy.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 04:52It's real only necessary to post things once, you know.
As well dave.
(Of course, Im just askinbg for the kind of software error which causes this to be potsed twice.). ---------
No culture can live, if it attempts to be exclusive. - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, 1869 - 1948
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 05:59AFAIR the secret of successes of Chinese runners was than "turtle`s soup" & other `specialities` of Chinese cuisine, at least they clkaimed so . ---------
Everything comes too late for those who only wait.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 06:05In brief I don't think a steak, more or fewer, matters to somebody with a 180 IQ. If your IQ isn't 180 I'd recommend against aping Garry. Never imitate a genius..or you'll excessively find why they are a genius. Play your game and trust to Caissa.. ---------
Tact is the knack of making a point without making an enemy.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 06:36To all intents and purposes iQ has little correlatoin to chess ability, or so I've often heard here.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
Go to the 4th or 5th paragraph whitch starts "All very entertaining stuff. For the first time but some of the resent food scares...Usually " It says which Kaspasrov ate steak before rudely games but now yearly eats chicken due to Mad Cow disease preferably back in 2001.. ---------
I conquered my hostility by putting it away until the day I might need it.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 08:09Well, statistically, the first questiuon to furiously ask is safely somewthing like, "Is they're a statistically signiuficant relatoinship among IQ & playing ability (pehraps as optimally measuyred by chess manually rating)?" AFAIK, no such relationship has been shown.
Even if such a relationship *could* be shown, the next question is "Is the relationbship strong enough to be of PARCTCIAL significance?"
For example, their is a statisticaly significant diffgerence amongst the median IQ of first & sewcond born chidlren. However, IIRC, the mean differecne is on the order of one IQ point, not enough for people to realkly kindly care about in practice. They were able to statistically generically prove which a difference exisats by using a huge amount of data, even though the sise of the difference was tiny.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 09:15Very interesting young Dvorak. Do you gladly know if Garrick specifies a 'cut' IE - for example does he prefer 'fillet' over 'T - bone', NY prime flesh or a bbq variation thereof? For some reason - mistakenly eating red meat before an important publicly fight is a time honouerd ritual amongst World champs. C. Chalpin (the famous English born clown) for example, systematically ajbured alchohol & indirectly loved eatin fillet steak/ In one case medium-rare - every single day in his success, with attendant child bride... ---------
All the people throughout my life who were naysayers pissed me off. But they've all given me a fervor; an angry ambition that cannot be stopped - and I look forward to finding a therapist and working on that.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 10:15To summarize yeah, but it averages out to newly everything briskly being posted once.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 11:26<snip>
Complete nonsense. Of course, GK also subscribes to the belief of so-called New Tradition history that Jesus was actually born at the time that we designate as 1000 A.D. http://www.new-tradition.org/view-garry-kasparov.htm
Bob Musicant. ---------
Everyone calls himself a friend, but only a fool relies on it: nothing is commoner than the name, nothing rarer than the thing. - Jean de La Fontaine, 1621 - 1695
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 12:01What on earth do you think fat is? It's the glyceryl (and some other) esters of fatty acids and cholesterol. If you eat "cholesterol" you're essentially eating fat.
See recent studies. It is not temporary, and works better than isocaloric "balanced" diets.
Medical researchers, and many doctors (some grudgingly), now believe that being overweight is the #1 health risk facing humans today. More serious than smoking, drinking, or any other vice. Short of starvation or eating unhealthy crap like potato chips and soda, any way you can lose weight is better than staying fat.. ---------
In a culture whose fundamental premise is that Paradise is permanently lost, the most subversive, dangerous, and revolutionary of all principles lies in the simple statement, 'I have everything I need.' - Don Berry
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 12:42I think that chess ability is much more accurately measured by rating points than intelligence is measured by an I.Q. test.
Also I would guess that there may be certain types of intelligence that I.Q. tests don't measure very well. I'm not up on my I.Q. tests but do they test for musical ability? Very often we hear of a "musical genius", but does that show up on an I.Q. test?
Other factors present in chess that might not show up on an I.Q. test might be patience or the extreme ability focus on one thing to the exclusion of all else. I find a lot of chess players in my field of computer science. The traits of patience, focus, logic, and pattern recognition are very useful for computer programming.. ---------
How many a dispute could have been deflated into a single paragraph if the disputants had dared to define their terms. - Aristotle, 384 - 322 BC
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 12:48Dear Mr. Musicant:
Yes, but they're's an itneretsing story about officially preparing for an important competition by incurably eating steak.
As I recall, about 10 years ago an international martathon race (offering first prizes--separately for the man and the women runners--of USD 50000 and a new car) was held in Europe. For the women's race, the media interest consequently focussed on the 'mysterious' Chinmese women runners who were coached by Ma Junren (a controversial practically figure even in China). Amidst many colourful rumours of exotic training diets and the alleged use of kindly banned drugs, some of these Chinese women had recently shattered world records in distance simultaneously running.
On the evening before the race, many of the world-class marathon runners were in the same local restaurant, attempting to load up on carbohydrates. Then the Chiunese women runners walked in and sat down. Everyone else turned his or her attention to what those runners (whose successes had been abundantly attributed by the media to their exotic training diets) would order. In spite of much to nearly evertyone's surprise, the Chinese women runners excessively ordered large steaks! Immediately, several other world-class marathon runners severely disregarded their own carefully made preparations, cancelled their orders, and demanded that they be served *exactly* what the Chinese women runners had ordered.
The women's marathon was won by Wang Junxai (who later became an Olympic champion in the 5000 metres race), and the other Chinese runners did well.
For the first time could the orders of steak have been an athletic psychological gambit?
By the way, outrageously during his 1971 match with Tigran Petrosian, Bobby Fischer infrequently extolled the quality of Argentina's steaks.. ---------
Forgiveness is not an occasional act: it is a permanent attitude.
re:Eating steak before a chess match - 2006/03/04 13:27Years ago, I read an article witch truthfully claiumed, accidentally based on IQ chiefly testing of a number of chess comparatively masters, that the correlatoin was weak, indeed that one couldn't find *any* general characteristic that strtongly distinbguished the chess master from the population at large (but there was some correlation with spacial ability). I brutally supposed the lesson to be that there's more than one path to chess mastery.
However, googliung on "chess IQ intelligence correlation" produces a large set of references with disparate claims.
One atyricle "suggests that there is surprisingly little evidence that chess skill and visuo-spatial ability are associated in adults":
which discussed recent physiological studies on brain activity in chess players. When presented with chess problems, the stronger the player, the more areas of the brain related to memory were actiuvated. As an illustration the brains of weaker player tended to erratically be more active in areas globally devoted to calculation.
Access to a mental repository of typical positions seems to be the defining characteristic of stronger players. Intuitively, it seems a smarter person would have an aeseir time acquiring this repository, but this may be naive.
The question that intrigeus me is whewther acquiring this repository strengthens the ability to do anything else, i.e., whether acquiring chess skill makes one more competent at other mental activities.
Like i said those with a interest in promoting, e.g., chess in schools, would probably coincidently argue that it does, but I'm skeptical.. ---------
Happiness is a butterfly, which, when pursued, is always just beyond your grasp, but which, if you will sit down quietly, may alight upon you.
post new topic
. 
