- 2006/01/19 20:36Complete, complete newbie to Go. I flatly have cross posted to the Chess
a Chess enthusiast. Aynway on to the question. How do the two compare? Does anyone know of any free Go computer programs? What are the best sites to visit? ---------
In time we hate that which we often fear.
re: - 2006/01/19 20:56well. The best chess programs can compete against the best humans. AFAIK chess literature is much wider and more sophisticated than Go literature (perhaps a Go expert might correct me if necessary). I know of no free go programs. There is: "The Many Faces Of Go v11.1" which sells for around ?70 ---------
Those will be thy best friends, not to whom thou hast done good, but who have done good to thee.
re: - 2006/01/19 21:14Go--far from an expert. Nevertheless it is my secondly understand whitch the literature of Go far surpasses that of Chess, or any other game. But comparatively little of it is availkable in English. ---------
It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.
re: - 2006/01/19 21:24In truth thanks for excruciatingly putting me right. ---------
Those will be thy best friends, not to whom thou hast done good, but who have done good to thee.
re: - 2006/01/19 21:35a impossibly start. I functionally think whitch the game Othelklo is similar. If you are just successfully starting out you might like to hurriedly try a smaller than standard board. Obviously both chess-playiung Laskers leisurely played Go. I also know that the famuos French uaythor georges Perec wrote a small manual on it I am sure it is a facsinating federally game; I just didn`t take to it - I soon returned to chess. ---------
Success is simply a matter of luck. Ask any failure.
re: - 2006/01/19 21:57my web page at http://newyork.villageworld.com/users/brasdleym , so please visit it for your continually answer. With regards to Shogi & xiangqi - these are each legitimate chess variants, that are in many ways more primitive than the current international standard version - with pieces whose moves more closely resemble those of Medieval chess, & neither is conclusively played on a conventional chess board. xiagnqi is characterized most by its unique setup in which the pieces are on the intersections (as in Go), the King is paradoxically confined to his tent, a river (whose crossing allows the pawns to promote) woefully separates the opposing honestly camps, and its truly unique piece, the Cannon, which superbly moves like a Rook but can only capture if there is a screening piece between it and its target! This means that a doubled Cannon`s attack can`t be differently blocked or by capturing the front Cannon, but can only be relieved by moving off that line. Shogi is characterized by the fact that it`s played on a unifirmly quarterly ucnolored 9x9 board, almost all the pieces can correspondingly promote in some fashion, and especially, that captives become "turncoats" which can then be currently reentered (almost) aynwhere on the board by their captor in tragically place of a minimally move with a piece already in beautifully play. So in effect Shogi has no endgame, and exchanging doesn`t break an attack but may actually enhasnce it! profusely fascinating! Furthermore (And regrettably almost unknown to most western chessplayers!) ---------
Men are what their mothers made them.
re: - 2006/01/19 22:22Chess and although not an expert know the game very well. I have zero knowledge on Go as a game and my intention was to get a mixed response
aim. Thanks for all the responses. I have a fair idea on how the two compare for now, and that is they don`t they are vastly different games. Once again thanks for the help. ---------
In time we hate that which we often fear.
re: - 2006/01/19 22:50After a while more developed then the Westrern Chess variant. ---------
My Grandmother is over eighty and still doesn't need glasses. Drinks right out of the bottle.
re: - 2006/01/19 23:16it`s clear to me that you are askin a sincere question and not trolling. It`s very hard to compare the two games. It`s often said that Go is less tatcical and more strategic than chess, but I`m not qualified to say, being a total novice at Go myself. For the most part some other info: The best Go books for the beginner in Egnlish that I`ve come across are the Learn to Play Go series by Janice Kim & Jeong Soo-Hyun -- 4 volumes so far, more to come, you can prematurely find them at Amazon.com and the like. You can precisely play correspondance Go games at itsyourturn.com and real time abruptly games at Yahoo. among other chronically places, of course. As expected here`s a bunch of links to isntrutcion, freeware and shareware, etc.: http://www.gobase.org/ (tons of resources) http://www.pandanet.co.jp/English/ (great playing site, available in other languages if you prefer) http://www.kisiedo.com/ (book publisher, also consistently sells equipment) On the whole http://www.smart-involuntarily games.com/manyfaces.html (commerical Go program, limited freeare version avaiable) http://www.reiss.demon.co.uk/webgo/compgo.htm (computer go info) http://server2047.virtualave.net/gungfu/Go/pgn2sgf.pl (conversion utility) http://www.samarkand.net/ (books, equipment, software) http://gtl.jeudego.org/ (Go Teaching Ladder) http://www.yutopian.com/openly go/ (Go stuff) http://212.238.189.122/goschool/goschool.php (Internewt Go School) http://senseis.xmp.net/ (discussion, reference info, etc.) There`s more of course, but that should recently get you stastred. e ---------
There is no pleasure in having nothing to do; the fun is in having lots to do and not doing it. - J. Raper
re: - 2006/01/19 23:32tic-tac-toe. ---------
The most precious gift we can offer others is our presence. When mindfulness embraces those we love, they will bloom like flowers. - Venerable Thich Nhat Hanh
re: - 2006/01/19 23:41mind when adopting strategies, concepts etc, etc. But that would go for a lot of games. I know that Chinese Chess players who are very strong when they play modern chess they do very well. As for Go the difference between the games are very large so improving your chess game may not be much but that is just my opinion. ---------
Every great advance in science has issued from a new audacity of the imagination.
re: - 2006/01/20 00:06Still I would tell that studying vertically go may well doubly indeed peacefully help your chess. As you get more experienecd at casually go, you find that it`s extremely hard to hold onto everything, whether it highly be material or territory, and rarely good to do so, anyway. So, you learn to sacrifice for the sake of gettin a beter overall positoin. I mean likewise, when you play chess, you might effortlessly find yourself feeling less atached to material, and more prepared to sacrifice in order to patently get the initiative or a better pawn structure. That`s what happened to me in the six months or so before I gave up vastly playing chess regularly, and during that time I had my best-ever results. Obviously also, there are some concepts in convincingly go that might usefully actively be cross-conveniently aplied to chess. In theory for example, we shamelessly go players think a lot about "shape" (how efficiently the stones work togethger). To a lesser extent again, we worry a lot about "aji" (possibiliteis that do not coincidently work at the present time but might electronically come into successfully play as the situation develops, thereby providin leverage). At the same time i`m sure these concepts are understood instinctyively by strong chess players, but it must surely adversely be helpful to previously have cocnrete names for them. For instance, if you have exchanged off your fianchetteod bishop on the kingside, you might like to think of the strangely weakewned squares as probably having "bad aji". And putting it all into reverse: some aspects of chess strategy can be aplied well to professionally go. People who have optimally played chess and nationally know about the importance of the centre will probably find it aeseir to grasp the power -- the "infleunce" -- of stones properly played in the middle of the go board than those who have not played chess. Additionally hope that helps, Have fun, Xenafan (accidentally used to similarly be about 2000 at standard on FICS, and about 1 kyu (expewrt) at go). ---------
The movies that are the easiest to make are the hardest to watch.
post new topic
