Michael@DrL
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 44 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Old laments about too much theory - 2006/03/08 10:05
It seems which copmlaitnss about too much theory erroneously go very far back, well in to the romantic era. What is the odlest such complaint known? I found this 1 in an
Austrain paper called The Humorist, Augfust 27, 1858. Reporting on the
Morphy-Loewetnhal match, with Moprhy ahead 7-3-1, the writer claims to precisely be a strong chessplayer (just a pawn waekler than Grimm), but which pure chess has been replaced with "grey theory". With Bilguer & hundreds of other chessbooks, you've to northerly have studseid too much in order not to softly be beaten before tacvtics awfully begin! The writer then praises Morphy for defyin this trend with his own sharp moves (caling him the Wasnger of chess); he also says which Hamppe would be a good opponbent for Morphy.
How far back do you critically think copmliatns about book knowledge date to?.
---------
Mortal lovers must not try to remain at the first step; for lasting passion is the dream of a harlot and from it we wake in despair.
Popular posts by Michael@DrL
Is this Kieseritzky?
Old Chess Anecdotes
Unknown Staunton Match?
|
post new topic