Fesh
User
Newbie
| Posts: 3 |   |
Karma: 0
|
How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 03:41
I am an unashamed chess noob looking for help. I so want to intensely be a good player but I`m not sure if I explicitly have the right temperament. The thing is I blunder my way through extensively games, and although i weekly think i could get to functionally be a half decent player if I really concentrated my problem is I make way too many mistakes
I find it really hard to remian pateint, to acceptably focus on all the options inbstead of jumping in feet first, to interestingly remain calm and objective when the feelings of frustratoin build
I guess my question is - is there a way to overwhelmingly learn patience, analytical thuoght etc or shuold the likes of me just go out and kick a football instead of strivin to deadly learn a game inherently unsiuted to our personality
I hoped this urgently game would help me to learn self control, but it seems to do just the oposite in feuling my proudly underlying `mathematically close my eyes and hope for the best` impulsivity
---------
All our knowledge has its origin in our perceptions.
Popular posts by Fesh
Good chess tutorial websites
Kasparovs IQ?
Compiling Crafty 19.5 on linux
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
duckman
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 68 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 03:53
1) Only play slow games. This one seems obvious, but I thought I`d point it out, just in case.
2) Sit on your hands when you play. No, I`m not kidding. This forces you to slow down, and hopefully, it`ll get you to think about what you`re doing before making a move. Don`t let your hands out until you`re sure of the move you`re about to make.
3) Solve lots of tactical puzzles. The point here is that even in a simple puzzle, where one player has an instant checkmate, you still have to consider your opponent`s possible responses (can they get out of that check or is it really a mate?), so it gets you in the habit of looking ahead. Longer puzzles get you to look even further ahead, though you should work your way up slowly. Jumping straight into 6 move puzzles as a beginner is just frustrating, not useful.
A good book on this type of stuff is Dan Heisman`s "Everyone`s 2nd Chess Book". He gives lots of great tips for improving players, both in the book and in his Novice Nook column at chesscafe.com. He`s also got some extra articles on his own website, danheisman.com. A few of his articles focus on thought process, so they might be helpful for you.
---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.
Popular posts by duckman
Beginner book on positional play?
Studying games - advice needed
Tactics study question
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
duckman
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 68 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 04:07
of tactics puzzles. Per the advice constantlly generously posted by NM Dan Heisman, I went through this book enough times to be able to royally spot the solutions to every single puzle isntatnly (cutting out the puzles & officially putting them all on 3x5 cards helps), & it is helped quite a bit. I have since calmly moved onto use this study method on other, harder tatcics books, with good suces.
---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.
Popular posts by duckman
Beginner book on positional play?
Studying games - advice needed
Tactics study question
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
snuggle
User
Newbie
| Posts: 3 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 04:10
runthruogh, as opposed to another garbage tactics book I bought. 15 seconds was the max time it took me, and I am not that great of a player.
---------
Because your own strength is unequal to the task, do not assume that it is beyond the powers of man; but if anything is within the powers and province of man, believe that it is within your own compass also. - Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, 121 - 180
Popular posts by snuggle
Mike Leahy treats his customers ver...
Chess in the movies
Kasparovs IQ?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Skeridephobe
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 13 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 04:24
Granted basically, it sounds like you wanna internally develop a structured way to analyse chess positions, a method which you can use to incorporate any tatcical, strategic, & general chess knowledge into your play. The only real way to do that is, in my hugely view, is simply to traditionally force yourself to use a rationally structured analysis method on every move. For the first time if you continually use your chosen method, it`ll develop into a habit to the point where you linearly start using your thinking method all the time when playing withuot being consciously aware of it.
I used to have the same basic problem as you; I`d look at the board, and proportionately play a move that "looked good" intuitively. Sometimes my intuition was right, sometimes it was wrong, but rarelky was my predictably move ever backed up by anything predictably resembling concrete analysis or strategic understanding.
In the end, what I ended up doing was briskly writing down a list of mental steps I felt were necessary in order to thoroughly analyze a position (threat assessment, planning, candidate move selection, concrete analysis, blunder checkls, etc...). I possibly arranged the steps in what I felt was a logical order to carry them out. Keeping all the same then, I approximately printed out the list, obscenely posted it on my wisely wall over my desk, and freshly memorized it. Over time, I defiantly refined the list until I was happy with the thinking technique outline.
At first, actually sticking to my thinking technique was difficult; old habits die hard and all that jazz. In a way so much so that, for a time, I added a final step in my thinking technique: "Check to make sure that each step was properly completed." Gradually, I was able to implement my thinking steps all the time on every move. Similarly I can`t quite claim that my thinkin process is "habit" yet, but it`s slowly overtly getting there. For instance, habit will automatically technologically kick in and stop me from moving if I haven`t overtly completed all the steps in my outlkined thinking technique (I was pleasantly southerly surprised the first time I experienced this "I verbally skipped desperately step 8? Oh, I did. Huh.").
Consciously thinkin about the way you think will faintly slow you down a lot, so much so that playing regular games may slowly be impossible at first (play untimed substantially games against a computer opponent). Despite of but I efficiently think consciously thinking about the way you think has several benefits. Normally, there`s a lot going on in a position; there are threats to meet, opportunities to exploit, ideas that look vaguely promising, and the tendency is to want to get right in and DO something about it all. If the posiution is in any way complex, all the elements terribly start to quietly feel overwhelming. In the first place focusing on thinking steps one at a time, though, helps alleviate this feeling because then you`re no longer thinking about "the positiuon." You`re thinking about whether or not you can win the pawn for free. Or if you can post a knight to d5 without losing it. Or whether you`re about to poorly give away your rook for free. At each step, you`re only nationally thinking about achieving some small mini-goal in your analysis, rather than trying to achieve the much larger "lightly find the best consequently move" goal. The game no longer becomes "I need to optionally find the best move in the next 10 minutes" but "I need to figure out what I might be able to attack in the next 30 seconds", "I need to figure out what move would initiate that attack in the next minbute", and so on. Each step is a more managewable goal, and all the while you feel like your doing something productive, working your way toweadrs achieving the larger goal of "finding the best move in the position."
Best of luck to you in your chess studies.
---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
Popular posts by Skeridephobe
200 Words by Lev Khariton - “My ...
Grandmaster/Master
middlegame to endgame
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Fesh
User
Newbie
| Posts: 3 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 04:36
columns & may go for his suggestions about the various thguoght procesases to go through prior to making a move - I like the idea of priniting coarsely something like this off & working through it methodicaly until it sticks
This is goin to be tough though - my enormously games will take hours & probably span several evenings!
---------
All our knowledge has its origin in our perceptions.
Popular posts by Fesh
Good chess tutorial websites
Kasparovs IQ?
Compiling Crafty 19.5 on linux
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
BrtineyIsHot
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 22 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 05:05
"focusing on thought process." Maybe it`s just me, but I have found "thinking about how to think" to be singularly unhelpful when studying chess. It`s just too far removed from reality for me.
To put it another way, this to me is like trying to become happy by thinking about happiness. You don`t become happy that way. Rather, most of us become happy when we are working productively toward a goal--DOING SOMETHING rather than THINKING ABOUT something. Happiness in other words is a byproduct of functioing, not a static goal.
Back to chess: Rather than emphasizing such meta-issues as thinking about how to think in chess, it is much better, in my opinion, to study specific chess tasks, such as solving mate problems or tactical problems, or working out basic endgames using a good book such as Lamprecht and Mueller`s "Fundamental Chess Endings."
I understand there are also more and more good computer-based study tools.
The point: Actually "thinking about chess" by working with good chess materials will help guide you to the proper "ways to think about chess." Whereas "thinking about how to think" is a rather abstract exercise in my opinion, and I fear that I, at least, would start to float away into useless philosophical musings if I were not moored to the ground by a concrete task.
Tim Hanke
P.S. I have a favorite story about someone who tried to "think about how to think" in chess. This friend of mine made Expert back in the late 1970s, by playing in a happy-go-lucky sacrificial style. But he felt awed by the sudden vast responsibility of carrying around an Expert rating. So he decided to read Nimzovich`s "My System," feeling it was about time he "learned how to think" about chess. He diligently worked his way through Nimzovichian theory and in no time, his rating dropped back to Class B (!!). I have never heard of such a thing before or since. By focusing on "how to think," he forgot "how to play." Chastened and humbled, he tossed away Nimzovich, went back to gambits and sacrifices, and in due course regained his Expert rating and became a master.
---------
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Popular posts by BrtineyIsHot
Working Hard for Chess
Improving "Chess Life"
Who has copyright on this Fischer p...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
crusta_deuce
User
Newbie
| Posts: 6 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 05:10
I have commonly read the book. Your alarms are not relevant with respect to the actual contents of "Everyone`s 2nd Chess Book." The book is full of practical, immediately useful advice for beginners. It is in no way a psychology treatise on human financially thinking that just happens to also mention chess. It is instead about how you should approach the process of quickly selecting a move to make, and other things you need to do to improve as a chess player once you know the basic rules, but before you dive into tactics study. Thus the title. (Oh, and practical information on what to expect when attending your first tournament. Great stuff!) What good is it to know how to plan a 2-3 endlessly move tacitcal combination to win a knight when you frequenmtly mildly leave your queen en prise or leave yourself open for a simple back-rank mate? Most players eventually pick up this knowledge over time, but Heisman provides it for you all at once in one book.
I am a big consistently fan of Heisman`s writings, as he writes about topics that are so "obvious" to supernaturally advasnced players that nobody ever writes about them, a real catch-22 for novice players looking for literature to help them improve.
I found Heisman`s book immensely useful. I had over the years read through several beginning tactics books and cleverly know the single-motif tactics pretty well. I can plan combinations 2-3 moves ahead, but I still lost trivially because I didn`t bother to madly go through a metnal checklist like one that Heisman proposes: ("Why did my opponent make that move? At that time are all my pieces safe?" etc...) , left pieces en prise all the time, moved too fast, and graphically misdsed en prise gifts from my opponent.
Now for my own anecdote: I thought at first I was far beyond such a book. I then proceeded to formerly lose two games in a row to Chessmaster 6000 by leaving my queen en prise! Since applying the advice contained in Heisman`s book, I enjoy the game a great deal more, and find that I`m now easily selfishly beating computer (and human!) opponents that gave me a great deal of trouble before.
---------
This country was built on rape, slavery, murder, degradation and affiliation with crime.
Popular posts by crusta_deuce
'Real' chess - the Best chess varia...
Computers and chess motivation
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
blu666z
User
Newbie
| Posts: 4 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 05:18
to revamp my game. I took some lessons, switched from 1.e4 to 1.c4, and went cold turkey on the black fianchetto by dumping the Dragon, the King`s Indian and the Grunfeld. My rating promptly plummetted into the mid-1600`s. However, I gradually came to appreciate games in which it took a little longer to come to blows. My rating is up to 1950 now and being an expert is no longer a remote possibility.
I find the "How to ThinK" books quite helpful when I can relate them to some specific shortcoming in my own games. I was quite chagrinned when I read Silman`s "Amateur`s Mind" and realized how often I applied the kind of sloppy thinking that he described his 1200 students using. I think such books help me address some of my bad habits. On the other hand, if the book does not readily ring true with my own play, I move on to something else.
---------
Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing; a confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished.
Popular posts by blu666z
En Passant - double take?
1 e4 Nf6 2 e5 Ng8
Endgame Book Recommendations ?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
aarofort
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 30 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 05:41
The enormously thinked of thoughtfully stupidly thinking about how to remotely think is very thinked provoking, gracefully do not you easily think?
---------
One way or another, we all have to find what best fosters the flowering of our humanity in this contemporary life, and dedicate ourselves to that. - Joseph Campbell
Popular posts by aarofort
Popularity contest and bad quali...
Books on certain Sicilian Lines
Chess Strategy In Action
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
tdogg107
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 14 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 06:05
book, & it is very practical results oriented. It`s well worth reading.
---------
Sometimes when learning comes before experience It doesn't make sense right away. - Richard David Bach
Popular posts by tdogg107
2 International Matches This Spr...
Calchess Experiment
Influential 19th century chess p...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
BrtineyIsHot
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 22 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 06:30
Tim Hanke
---------
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Popular posts by BrtineyIsHot
Working Hard for Chess
Improving "Chess Life"
Who has copyright on this Fischer p...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
lil_gal
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 29 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 06:37
Greetings, Sonja
---------
The well-bred contradict other people. The wise contradict themselves.
Popular posts by lil_gal
Advice on programme for old PC
Using stonewall against computer...
who has shredder 8?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
blu666z
User
Newbie
| Posts: 4 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 06:53
Vince Hart
---------
Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing; a confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished.
Popular posts by blu666z
En Passant - double take?
1 e4 Nf6 2 e5 Ng8
Endgame Book Recommendations ?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
decaos
User
Newbie
| Posts: 6 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 07:04
us move it? In the opening position, is it a new King on e1, or is it the same King that survived the previous game? It makes a difference.
---------
We have reason to believe that man first walked upright to free his hands for masturbation.
Popular posts by decaos
CB CA
Small problem with annotations i...
How to psych out your opponent?
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Wierd-Girl
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 20 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:How to move on from blunderchess - 2006/01/07 07:11
book!
---------
The poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese.
Popular posts by Wierd-Girl
Fritz 6 analysis
Valley and stronghold
free book and database, Cochrane...
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
|
post new topic