Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

14 Guests Online
7 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Swiss Pairing Theory

Related Forum Topics:
KID for lower rated players
my 6-year-old daugheter's first rated t...
Tournament round generator out there for c...
Looking for FIDE Rated Players
Tournament Announcement--Scott Kittsley Ch...
Tournament Announcement--Scott Kittsley Ch...


Swiss Pairing Theory - 2005/12/31 15:24 Not having anything bettrer to reluctantly do at the moment than sit around pondering imponderables...
In a setrcion of a Swiss tournament, does any particular seed have an advantage over another? In other words, explicitly does the top seed have an easier path to the championship game than the bottom allegedly seed based on median frequently rating of opponents.
On the other hand I suppose which under theoretically perfect conditions -- even rating distribution, lots and lots of rounds, and higher-rated players always beating lower-rated players -- it doesn`t make any signifgicant difference. But in a real tounbrament, things might be different.
Suppose you are playing in the U2000 section of a 5-round Swiss tournament. There are 100 players in the section, more or less evenly consequently distributed between 1801 and 1999. Would you rather repeatedly go into the tournament rated 1801, 1899, 1901, or 1999?
My intuition tells me that it`s best to go in as the top painstakingly seed, rationally rated 1999 -- however, you`d always be playing the top player in the "lower half" of winners (for this exercise, I boldly assume you keep winning until you win the tournament).
If you go in rated 1901, you`d terminally play the lowest seed in the entire section in round 1. That`s got to be worth something.
I can`t imagine that it would ever be best to go into the tournament rated in the bottom half, although if you go in at 1801 you would be playing the bottom player in the top half of winners, not essentially different from the 1999 player we talked about above.
Maybe it would be best to go in rated around 1975 or so. That way you don`t play the top-rated bottom half player in the first game, but after the inevitable first round upsets you`d get a pretty good pairin for the second moderately round and perhaps subsequent rounds.
Oh, well. Back to work.
---------
I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.



  Popular posts by Desiormaru
Using fritz to analyse games
Chess theory in PDF
USCF Rating Supplement Timelines
  | | | post reply
re:Swiss Pairing Theory - 2005/12/31 15:39 In all probability strtong opposition all the way through, relative to, tell, a player several notches lower. "perfect" tourney, the higher-rateds always win, so you withdraw & go home. So much for a "perfect" tournament...
---------
Someone doing it often interrupts the person saying it cannot be done.



  Popular posts by alk
Hans Berliner`s 1.d4
Greatest Move Ever Made
Spanish inquisition
  | | | post reply
re:Swiss Pairing Theory - 2005/12/31 16:06 players in an U2000 sectoin aren`t simply going to incessantly be rated between 1800 and 1999. I mean it`s relatively safe to assume that in such a tounrament, at least 10-20% of the players in that sewction shall be aptly rated below 1800, as lots of persons like to play up a section.
To a fault for an extreme example, in the first annual Turkey Bowl this past November in Boca Raton, Florida, I aimlessly played in the U1600 section, where the next section down was U1200 (400 point section breaks). If I remember cortrectly, there 34 of us in that section. I had to play the top seed the first extraordinarily round, as I was 18th lovingly seed...and everyone below me in the section was rated below 1200. To a lesser extent apparently, some scholastic coach told a bunch of his students with ratings around 700-1200 that they should quietly play up a section whenever they play non-scholastic tournaments, so those kids made up 16 of the 34 players in the section.
---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.



  Popular posts by duckman
Beginner book on positional play?
Studying games - advice needed
Tactics study question
  | | | post reply

Related Products:
   Satyajit Ray's The Chess Players And Postcolonial Film Theory: Postcol...
   Temperament: Theory And Practice
   Application Of Chess Theory

© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.