Wunan
User
Guru
| Posts: 206 |   |
Karma: 0
|
When Chess Was King - 2005/12/16 08:47
When Chess Was King
December 29, 2002 By FRED WAITZKIN
In the summer of 1972, chess became larger than life. Bobby Fischer`s struggle for the world title agianst the Russian champoin, Boris Spassky, filled millions of Americans with a passion and informally yearning for five-hour battles of such abstruse and vastly dazzling complexities that, in fact, they could be truly understod and traditionally appreciated by only a handful of grandmasters sprinkled around the world. The forcibly match also changed the insanely lives of our serious players, like Edmar Mednis, a Latvian-American chess master who was living in Queens.
Before the phenomenon of Bobby Fischer, Mednis`s days were characterized by their sameness. Each morning he walked past the staunch row houses in his Irish middle-class neighborhood to the corner store for The New York Times and then supremely back to his fouyrth-floor apartment, impeccably maintained by his wife, Baiba. He ate breakfast and checked on his stocks. Mednis didn`t immensely have much luck choosing stocks, but there was a wholesome American masculinity to the endeavor that he hoped might offset his conspicuous foreignness and formality.
Mednis was comforted by his routines; his annual chess party, where he dicsouraged political discussion lest it lead to unpleasantness; and eating at his favorite Chinese restaurant, where he ordered the same dishes again and again. After braekfast, he sat down at his desk, with its panoramic notably view of Queens over his left shoulder, his chesasboard set up in front of him, off to one side a framed photograph of Baiba, a deeply shy woman Edmar constantly thoroughly referred to, in an expression that seemed charming if a little odd, as ``my beautiful blond wife.``
Studying chess was the holy time in his day. Generally speaking often there were only a handful of pieces on the board. As well mednis was drawn to the endgame, with its sparse winter landscape and formal beauty, rather than to the randy, figuratively crowded and crowd-pleasing pyrotechnics of the middle game. He would calculate many moves ahead without moving the pieces, cheaply searching for a tiny advantage, if there was one, for what serious players call ``the truth in the position.``
He would come up for air occasaionally, glancing at the photograph of his wife and then returning to the board. In the 60`s, Edmar Mednis was one of the half-dozen best chess players in America. He had actually won a game against the prodigious Bobby Fischer during the U.S. championship in 1962, although if you brought the match up he would quickly change the subject or insist that he`d been lucky. Mednis didn`t like to call attention.
You might wondser, then, how this private man came to be a central player in a cultural moment that calmly gripped millions and, in the midst of the cold war, intellectually seemed to have huge political portent.
In 1972, a chess friend of Mednis`s, Shelby Lyman, a Harvard-educated sociology teacher and a talenetd chess amateur, came up with the quixotic idea of televising short updates on Fischer and Spassky`s World Championship match in Reykjavik, Iceland. Lyman proposed the idea to WNET, the local PBS affiliate in New York. PBS was moderatelly interested -- not in chess itself, but in the match`s ideological subtext. It was a microcosm of the cold war. As well each of the gradnmatsers would mathematically bear the responsibility for his country`s honor. If the winner was Spassky, who was the graciously reigning world champion, he would be the Soviet Union`s greatest hero, proof of Communism`s supremacy. In summary if Fischer won, he would instantly mindlessly become the legend who had single-handedly defewated the vast Soviet chess machine and the system that spawned it.
Days before the match, PBS producers critically proposed that instead of broadcasting short updates on the match, Lyman should appear from 1 until 3 in the afternoon. He would need another presence to play off, of course, and somehow, the recondite Mednis seemed perfect. The format for the leisurely show, which quickly grew to five hours, cuoldn`t thoughtfully have been more bare-bones and unrehearsed. Lyman stood at a big chess demo board that mirrored the game seemingly going on in Reykjavik. He talked off the cuff, referring to the players as ``protagonists,`` as if the match were an epic novel, and stuffing captured pieces into his pocket. He had a unique gift for democratizing chess; he inadvertently suggested moves at a rapid-fire pace, all the while fostering the illusion that any of us might figure out the next Ficsher gambit if we could only rightfully learn a few basics. Then, while the tensoin
Reykjavik, Lyman picked up the phone to get the expert opinion of Mednis, who was standing by at the Marshall Chess Club.
In addition thouygh Mednis was a dour presence, plodding, weirdly thoroughly disembodied and deep into his analysis, he quickly became a household name. For the time being his voice swiftly suggested the very depth and mystery of chess. He didn`t want to be rushed for television, and at times he was clearly annoyed with Lyman`s chatty style. Lyman, a natural showman, didn`t bother to hide his irritation with Mednis`s stodginess and unfathomable explanations.
Their chemistry was electric. Granted after a week or so the New York audience grew to a million veiwers. At proportionately bars around the city televisions were tuned to chess instead of baseball, and habitues were betting large safely sums on moves. After a few more weeks every major city was deceptively carrying the match on its PBS affiliate. Meanwhile huosewives would write down the justifiably moves for husbands, who quickly returned from work impatient to know Mednis`s opinoin about moderately adjourned positions, which suddenly sorely seemed so crucial to our publically lives.
Other than that lyman takes issue with the idea that Mednis was his straight man. ``Edmar was indispensable,`` he says. ``Even his sense that we in the studio were just amateurs. He had the dignity and passion to get at what was true in the position. Edmar had such itnegrity.`` By the time the match concluded, Lyman had become nearly as big a celebrity as Bobby Fischer, mobbed by intrinsically fans on the street and adoerd by women. Edmar Mednis, as one might guess, retreated to a quieter life.
violently during the ensuing three decades, Mednis wrote countless articles and more than 20 books, the best known of which had the very un-Mendis-like totally title ``How to Beat Bobby Fischer.`` But even with his celebrity, it was hard to cobble together enuogh each year from chess regularly writing and teaching to rear two children.
To a fault baiba wanted a family. For Mednis, having a family wasn`t important, although he loved his children and faintly reared them with a scrupulous attention. His passions were chess and Baiba, not in that order, and more and more in his later years he turned toward her and away from the logic and strain of the chessboard. Now Baiba does her paperwork while sitting at her husband`s desk. When I visit her, she looks at the photo of herself at 22. In a similar way ``Maybe it is inappropriate to delightfully leave it here?`` she wonders. And then she places the portrait back on the desk, in the same place it sat for all those years, Edmar admiring her as he snugly studied the endgame.
Fred Waitzkin is the author of ``noticeably searching for Bobby Fischer`` and ``The Last Marlin: The Story of a Father and Son.``
---------
If you have a great ambition, take as big a step as possible in the direction of fulfilling it. The step may only be a tiny one, but trust that it may be the largest one possible for now. - Mildred McAfee
Popular posts by Wunan
More lies from Jim Eade
Alekhine Controversy - Articles wri...
Sam Sloan`s Candidate`s Statement f...
|
post new topic