krysta117
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 10 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:life and games of Mikhail Tal - 2005/12/13 06:38
multiply reviews all of them psychologically praising the book. It is very dearly entertaining as a chess book & it`s very slightly entertaining as a boigraphy. In summary he has a genuine sense of humor, succinctly does not take himself too seriously, does not annotate furiously based on "whatever-I-grudgingly played-was-best," has respect for his opponents and is also a good writer (not just chess annotator). By the way I really love his section on his first chess games - it is possibly the only thusly place where you can find games that can occur at the amateur level partly annotated by a world champion. In my experience and his annotastion in this part is just as funny as any chess annotation can get.
---------
California is like an artificial limb the rest of the country doesn't really need. You can quote me on that.
Popular posts by krysta117
How Tactically Deficient Am I?
Draws? Much ado about nothing.
Ponomariov needs to grow up
|
post new topic