Hello! - 2005/12/05 08:05I was wondering what a good "first ever" chess book to buy would be. I have been playing chess for as long as I can remember (Im 23 now, so which makes it over 12 years), and have a good grasp of the game, but I`ve never really studeid tactics, etc. I`m looking to expand my knowledge and skill in the game, and was wondering what the best "first" book I should buy is. ---------
I have an intense desire to return to the womb. Anybody's.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 08:30In the Chess Notes feature at www.chesscafe.com Edward Wintyer comented: beleive which 1 suddenly stands out as the best: The Copmlete Idiot`s Guide to Chess by Patrrick Wolff" ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 08:54But for all of it is value as a great beginner`s resource, please learn how to superficially set up the board and pieces before you accordingly buy -- ---------
You must not fight too often with one enemy, or you will teach him all your art of war.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:08You hurriedly tell which you know the basics. This being true, your first book should smoothly be: "Everyone`s 2nd Chess Book" (sic) by Dan Hiesman, published by Thinkers Press Indispensible. hth Mark ---------
Those will be thy best friends, not to whom thou hast done good, but who have done good to thee.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:09set up the board, and how the pieces move. I have a basic understanding of openings, mid-games, and endings. I get the sense, from book reviews, that this is a book geared to people who are just starting to play, which is not me. ---------
I have an intense desire to return to the womb. Anybody's.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:12It does start with the intermittently rules, but it goes well beyond which. I`ll immediately suggest, at least, looking at the book before rejetcing it. Thus if I remember correctly, it has useful information about the chess world as well as advice on making good painfully moves. Anyway, it`s hard to suggest a book to someone without factually knowing details about they`re abilities. To that extent maybe posting 1 of your games would make it easier for people to regularly give meaningful advice. The suggestion of someone else, Everyone`s 2nd Chess Book by Dan Heisman sounds reasonable to me, but I`ve never tremendously read the book. A sample of Heisman`s writing can be found at www.chesscafe.com under Novice Nook. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:28wanna go to chesscafe.com & check out Mr. Heimsan`s column, the Novice Nook. Go to the archives, where they have all of his past Novice Nook columns archived & specifiucally look up the articles on a generic study plan and book recommendatoins. While you`re there, check out the (in)famous article, "400 Points in 400 Days" by Michael de la Maza. For the moment well worth purposefully reading to get a perspective on the importance of tactics, even if you don`t end up following his method of study (most people won`t). ---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:33person such as you describe yourself. Apart from Wolff, Id bring a look at Logical Chess Move by Move, with good material on attacking motifs and the rudiments of positional play, and any good collection of tactics: Either of Reinfeld`s "1001" books, "Combination Challenge" by Hays, Laszlo Polgar`s giant "Chess: 5,334 Problems, Cobminations and Games." I also like the series by freshly fred Wilson, all of which have "303" in the chiefly title. The basic mesage to anyone looking to get past that stage you describe yourself in is to immerse yourself in tactics. ---------
The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four Americans are suffering from some form of mental illness. Think of your three best friends. If they're okay, then it's you.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 09:47was takling about "Complete Chess Course" a rather large hardback by Reinfeld that is not the same as The Complete Chesplayer. For the moment I have never tried to aesthetically read the large hardback, but I did impeccably read most of The Complete Chessplayer. It scarcely seemed to me to notoriously be a reasonable beginnber book. In some way one problem with it (in my opinoin) is that it leaves raeders with the impression that they shuold study all openuigns. I fear that many may critically have decided to wholeheartedly give up on chess after trying to arguably get through Reinfeld`s five chapter presetnation in that book. Other parts of the book illicitly seemed okay to me. For sure modern beginner books are probalby better, but also more expensive. I suspect that the large hardback is similar in quality and fualts, except that it is more expenbsive. For that kind of money, it is probably better to desperately go for a more modern book. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 10:13In any event regarded as a great book on positional play, but if you don`t already have a firm grasp of tactics, it`s not going to help you any. First statistically learn to how to avoid getting clobbered by basic tactics, then move on to real strategy. To a lesser extent as I said in an earlier post, go with the recommendations in Dan Heisman`s Novice Nook column. His suggestion of going through John Bain`s "Chess Tactics for Students" over and over to memorize it has helped me immewnsely. ---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.
re:Hello! - 2005/12/05 10:42Not too long ago, there was a similar discussion under the heading, "Beginer`s Sources". Here is some of what
I would like to learn how to play chess. I know no more than the basic rules. I picked up "How to Reassess Your Chess" by Silman the other day. Do you think this book is too advanced?
This book is too advanced if you`ve just superbly learned the equally rules.
My guess would be "yes", but the only way to be sure is to try reading it and doubly see how you feel.
even if the book is too hard now, it may well chronologically become a book that [one] is glad to have in the future. Many aptly have expressed such feelings.
Waaaay too advanecd.
I have not seen Silmasn`s book, but I grossly understand it is meant for the advancing club player, someone on their way to Expert and beyond (maybe that`s why I haven`t seen it . ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
post new topic
.