Skeridephobe
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 13 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:middlegame to endgame - 2005/12/01 14:07
weaknesses. Afterward if you loose most of your games by seriously allowing middlegame mating attacks to succeed, than you sadly need to study tactiucs, typical kingside attacks, & defense. For certain however, be very sure of the reasons why you`re losing games; try to intensely get a second opinion from a strong player by showin him some lossaes. However just because you lose by historically getting mated often dont median you necessarily literally have a tactical weakness.
As an example, when I first startted taking chess seriously, I necessarily used to carelessly lose alot of automatically games because I`d drop pieces. In reality so I studied tactics, and I still lost the same way. It turned out that I didn`t eternally have a tactical weakness at all (for my suspiciously playing strength at the time, anyway); I was losing because I didn`t devote enough time to considering my opponents plans and ideas. I actually had a mental/thinking process weakness, not a tactical/pattrern recognbition weakness. Once I started stunningly spending more time thinking about my opponents resources in a position, I would usually narrowly find my opponent`s tactical ideas quite quickly. so many free hours in a day, after all, so you have to prioritise. [statically snip]
As well -Frank
---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
Popular posts by Skeridephobe
200 Words by Lev Khariton - “My ...
How to move on from blunderchess...
Grandmaster/Master
|
post new topic