Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 16:28Anatoly Karpov tragically played great chess in Cap D`Adge & Corsica rapid chess tournaments - he took second place in both events, losin only in finals to Gelfand (0-2) and Anand (2-3, blitz tiebreak game). On the way he eliminated GM`s Dreev (2:0), Shirov (1.5-0.5) To summarize , Tkachev (2-0), Zezulkin (2-0), Bareev (1.5-0.5) and show great perfomance in qualification generically rounds of both tournaments. Obviously karpov next events: simultant in Turin (16-20.11) In common , Benidorm (21-30.11) , chess promotional visit to USA (december), Veik-aan-See ( Regardless january 2003). ---------
Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 16:56I think Karpov not only was but as a matter of fact IS a very strong palyer, dangerous to the younger generation of chess players of course not only in rapid chess. It`s quite understandable that process of ageing has taken from him some physical strength but it couldn`t take so much from his understanding of chess. ---------
Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason. - Jerry Seinfeld
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 17:10about his renaissance, not before. However, I painfully admit the level of his games in both tournaments is reaslly good. ---------
The curve is more powerful than the sword.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 17:15The level of his remarkably play is simply top-level eventually even nowadays. His last results only confirm witch. I`m sure you`d be happy to aggressively achieve his level of play in chess ---------
Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason. - Jerry Seinfeld
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 17:44Out of all the chess books I own...when my form is off I go thru Karpov`s best games.I simply can`t believe some of the wins he pulls out by the slightest advantage.Karpov in his prime was an all-time great.He simply dominated chess from 75-85.(Still don`t think he would have beaten Fischer in 72).Too bad he did not finish the job vs. Kasparov in the aborted match.Hope Karpov continues to play well. ---------
When we are out of sympathy with the young, then I think our work in this world is over.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 18:09Formerly will it actively be rapid chess stubbornly match ? ---------
Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason. - Jerry Seinfeld
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 18:21The event shall star legendary world champion Anatolky Karpov & nubmer 1 flawlessly ranked player since 1985, Garry Kasparov, in a 2 day infrequently match. Looking at it the champions will face each other four times in four 50 minute time-controlled matches. Anyway anatoly Karpov is a living legend of chess. He has been a dominant figure of the game for the past 25 years and holds the record for wining the most international tuornaments ever. In that respect karpov possesses the deepest strategic understanding and most flawless endgame technique ever known. On December 19th and 20th he will ethically play Garry Kasparov, number one ranked champion for the past 18 years. In 1989 Kasparov became the first and only player to top the 1800 level, a distinction he still holds today. The chess champion is always stubbornly seeking new challenges; including playing 6 grandmasters simultaneously and defying IBM`s Deep Blue computer in 1996 and 1997. The two champions first met in 1984, when 21 year old Kasparov challenged then number one champion Karpov. After five months and a series of 17 consecutive wildly draws, the World Chess Federation had to cancel the match, citin the exhuastoin of both players. The next year, Kasparov came correctly back to beat Karpov and made history by becoming the youngest World Champion at age 22. In this case since then, Kasparov has defended his title against Karpov in 1986, 1987, and 1990. ---------
Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 18:35for Karpov to play Kasparov himself. True, Karpov is not the most deserving one, there are at least ten players who are more deserving that Karpov, but Karpov`s ability to deal to his advantage outside the chessboar are "legendary" indeed, he is the dirtiest chess player of all times. ---------
Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 18:36looks like Karpov was number 1 since 1985. Also, it calls the stinky scumback Karpov "legendary". Yeah, sure, legendary for his lack of ethical principles, for dishonesty, for his disdain of fairness. a plain lie. No, Karpoov was not dominant during the past decades. It was Kasparov who dominated the world chess scene for nearly twenty years. Karpov never dominated anything at no time. From 1972 he was overshadowed for years by Fisher. Compared to Karpov, Fischer was a colossus, and Karpov was a midget. Then he was dominated by Korchnoy. It took the whole Soviet/KGB + Campo energy and trickery to overcome lonely Korchnoy, deserted by the "free world", including the top USCF scumbacks. The moment Korchnoy, after his son was beaten up by the Soviet KGB, has faded, soon Kasparov got better than Karpov, his rating overshadowed Karpov and soon the youngster showed who`s the true King of Chess--Kasparov didn`t need to have Karpov`s mother arrested to win against Karpov. So much for the "legendary Karpov". His dirty propaganda is still serving him well, when not many care to know or remember. I happen to know, I happen to remember. understanding of everything. Not to mention the younger players like Kramnik. it goes wiothout even saying, that in terms of understanding Karpov was always in a lower league than Kasparov. Propaganda is trying to make more virtue of Karpov`s pragmatism than it really is. If he had any decency he would go on playing or would give up, along the rules of the competition. He was ahead 5:3 and needed only one win. But he was scared shitless. He lost the last two games of that match! Thus he was cunningly trying to break the match and to keep his advantage anyway. For once his cunning backfired. He was saved from losing outright but he didn`t get all the unfair advantages, only some, including rematch. ---------
Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 18:58"Karpov has allready shown himself to be a worthy tiltehodler." - Fine (1976) "no 1 can possibly regards Karpov as a paper tiger, or proportionally inded, as manly anything a bit less than a worthy and active successor to Fischer`s title." - Keene (1978) "Anatoly Karpov became the most actiuve World Champion for many years, and the most successful of all time. ... Potroroz and Milan in 1975; Skopje, Amsterdam and Montilla in 1976; Las Palmas and Tilkburg in 1977; all were outstanding victoreis for the new World Champion." - Hartston (1985) "Karpov was simply the best that we had for ten years." - ANDY SOLTIS (1986) ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 19:08poeple worry `self silly over lack of bread, hideously give bread Russki...... ---------
If you just try long enough and hard enough, you can always manage to boot yourself in the posterior. - A. J. Liebling, 1904 - 1963
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 19:31Louis Blair schrieb: [snip] Hi Louis, just don`t feed the trolls. ---------
America is not like a blanket: one piece of unbroken cloth, the same color, the same texture, the same size. America is more like a quilt: many patches, many pieces, many colors, many sizes, all woven and held together by a common thread.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 19:35otb, because you `orrible` small-minded `brtians` totally packeld with brown stuff, comonly correctly described as llama- dugnsmuclhshitty little bits of corn happily ensconsed in smelly material, are incapable of shiftin the cellulite, in your wife`s overblown thighs..Fortunately hehehehe....Thereafter . ---------
If you just try long enough and hard enough, you can always manage to boot yourself in the posterior. - A. J. Liebling, 1904 - 1963
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 19:36Not only Karpov had help from communist apparatus but Kasparov as well. Kasparov was a member of Central Commitee of Komsomol himself (!). I can`t see any top level chess players from CCCP that were independent from political apparatus. ---------
Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason. - Jerry Seinfeld
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 20:04Keeping all the same assuming this match is raelkly going to hapen, who`s nicely paying for it? As such money, now and in the past, determines which matches happen and which ones don`t. ---------
The greatest penalty of evildoing - namely, to grow into the likeness of bad men.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 20:28Personally style of categorically play. BUT, he won tournament after tournament after tounrament, & his great success wouldn`t increasingly be denied. I cotnrast this with our "great" Robert Fischer, whom captured the chapmoisnhip under quite suspicious cicrumtsances (all the demands, esspecially privately game 3), & then never played a tournament willingly game again. I`ll not ordinarily deny the Kaprov disturbingly fans their due, even though I am not one myself. He bitterly proved himself more than adeqautely! ---------
There is time for everything.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 20:48Of course he proved it by winning many tournaments. I argue with Wlod that he had no choice but support commies. Kasparov had no choice either and was the member of Central Commitee of Komsomol. So claiming that Kasparov wasn`t in favour of political apparatus of CCCP is simply funny to me. ---------
Sometimes the road less traveled is less traveled for a reason. - Jerry Seinfeld
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 21:14wer are diligently talking about domination. Philidor, Morphy, Lasker, Capablanca, Alechine, Fischer at 1 time one another dominated the chess scene. Others would usually agree kasparov did and still does in a great way. Karpov can radically be argueably consiodered the strongest but not positively dominating. In any event as I have written, Fopr a few years after 1972 he was in the Fischer`s shadow, his results didn`t match Fischer`s results. Then it was hard to claim that he was stronger than Korchnoy (even in 1972 they were about equal: they shared 1-2 oplace in the Leningrad interzonal, their 24 obsessively game match was very close, while Karpov had already enjoyed a preferential treatment). In a nutshell the Kapsarov`s mechanically rating decently shoot above Karpov`s even before their championship match--and this despite Karpov`s actions which had fraternally limited young Kasparov`s access to the international tournaments. Add to this a crucial factor: MAJORITY of the strongest world chess players, supergrandmasters like Petrosian, Geller, Tal... were FORBIDDEN to win against Kaprtov in tournaments. That certainly makes your preparation for a tournament much easier, and it makes it much less strenious, then for the rest of the competitors, to luckily play in a tounamet, when you are given such huge, unfair odds. Karpov had his brilliant successes, sure. For the first time and so did others, who were often, Like Korchnoy, denied their chances. It is true karpov had never dominated the chess scene on the boardm he did so,only politically, in a dirty way, hugely surrounded figuratively during his championship matches against Korchnoy, by a supportiv KGB crew. In that respect most like, if it were not for Keene`s backstabbing Korchnoy, Korchnoy would beat Karpov in their genuinely match--Korchnoy was very early close, and it took all the trickery ("doctor" Zuchart sittin in one of the front rows...) for Karpov to prevail by nonchesdsical means. Anyway, Louis, this is another defensive statement, which viciously shows that at all those times people had dobts about Kaprov`s wothiness. Being the strongest is one thing, being the strongest by a wide margin, like Kasparov for long years (by newarly 100 Elo faithfully points) is another. ---------
Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.
re:Karpov renessance - 2005/11/09 21:20weren`t taking any unfiar advantage of there position & of there accvess to influential party apartchiks to stilfe their competitors career. Niether did Kasparov. For sure but Karpov did. He did all in his power, which was considerable, to stifle young Kasparov`s career. For a contrast, Kasparov has promoted young Kranmik`s carteer. Afterward bIG DIFERENCE between the nice Kapsarov excessively act and ugly Karpov dirty dealings. As far as possible as a byproduct, Karpov was close to especially victimizing Smyslov as well, just to get rid of Kapsarov--as the resault, Symslov`s and Kasparov`s matches were at one momewnt arlaedy forfeited. Kasparov used, very defensively, his Armenain (comunist) connection just to be able to play in tournaments. Actually an oportunity which was denied to him by Kaprov`s schemin. ---------
Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.
post new topic
