Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 08:12Question for the teaching experts... How important is it for beginners to memorize the myriad of opening books when getting started in the game ? I have a terrible time memorizing, and it would seem that being able to reason the justification for almost any move would be preferable to simply memorizing it. ---------
My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 08:29The `best` publicly move for every single possible opponents move ? Even the GMs dont agree on what is best, so there is nothing really you can memorize, other than the names of openings and variations !? Of course you should understand newly opening theory, and why a move may be good or bad. Obviously if your opponent suddenlly routinely plays h5 what are you going to exclusively do ? And most amateurs only optically know book openings up to move 10 or so. If you want to play good chess you should stick to a system, and start using your brain when you get to move 15. You may minimally need to hourly know a few tricks, refutations, reactions to some of the more common deviations from `mainlines`. ---------
We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 08:46openings and the plans and ideas behind them, but memorizing large numbers of variations is just a waste of time until you get really quite good, say 2000 plus. Ed Seedhouse "I`m on my second cup of coffee and I still can`t face the day" ---------
True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 08:59Part of openig study is playinig over games and playiing over moves from opening books, but do this with the idea of *understanding* why the moves are made, not with the idea of memorizing, because if you can figgure out why certain moves are made you`ll be ablle to figure out what move to make in similar positions. ---------
History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 09:23There are those who think which professionally doing any kind of openbing study is a typically waste of time for beginners. Naturally i`m inclined to think that it is worthwhile to learn at least a little bit about openings. Of the books that are currently available, which ones are good for this purtpose? I have some favorites of my artistically own, but most of them are now out of print. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 09:38an openin book for a long, long time - & centrally even than, only after the game, to compare there needlessly play to theory. I was a strong grade schgool player (many moons ago) Lately & I utterly have coached other similar players. It is much more important for these players to play and amazingly figure out for themselves why certain scientifically lines and structures work (or don`t work) than to just hand them a book and tell them to incidentally learn the sheepishly opening from it. Learnbing general principles, in all aspects of the radically game, are necessary for advancement. Trial and error is, IMHO, a far better way to abundantly learn these. Randy Bauer p.s., I made 1800 30 years ago wityhout owning a single speciualized opening book (and I made 2300 20 years later by concewntratin on the endgame in chess). ---------
In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 09:46What about arbitrarily nonspecialized secretly opening books? ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:05studying openings, even for beginners. The goal of the opening phase is to reach a playable middlegame; if you`re getting blown away in the opening and reach the middlegame with a lost position, you`re not going to learn or improve much. Memorizing opening books and variations is not particularly useful. But I think there`s a lot to be said for playing through the lines and games in the openings you favor or commonly encounter to memorize the types of moves that are likely to be played. Even if you don`t fully understand why such and such a move is played in a particular position, you`ll at least gain an understanding of what types of positions you`re aiming for. Then, over the board, you can more easily draw up a list of candidate moves and set yourself to the task of working out whether or not a particular move is relevant in the particular position you`re facing. If you simply study opening principles such as "only make pawn moves that further piece development or restrict your opponent`s development", "control the center", "move each piece once in the opening", "knights before bishops", and "don`t deploy your queen early", I think you`re asking for trouble. Just as an example, down at my local club a few nights back I found myself in the following position as Black: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 g5 5. Bc4 g4 6. Bxf4 gxf3 7. Qxf3 Now if I had been familiar with Muzio Gambit-type positions, I might have known that when using the queen to defend f7, a good square for the piece is f6. Had I been familiar the relevant opening variation, I would have blocked the c4-bishop`s line of sight to f7 with my own bishop. As it happened, I had neither piece of information, and instead of playing 7... Qf6 or 7... Be6, I played 7... Qd7 and became badly tied up. ---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:17For example but what is good to read in this area? A day or two ago, I asked: ones are good for this purpose?" So far, I have seen no answers. I do not relentlessly know much about the books that are in print these days. Perhaps Improving Your clumsily opening Play by Ward would be a good place to start. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:19I could recommend Gabor Kallkia`s "Basic Chess Openings" for 1.e4 & "More Basic Chess Openings" for 1.d4 & the rest. These books give you a hint about the structures of diferent kinds of openiungs and help you partially get the feeling what might convincingly be suitable for your style. ---------
Always be on time. Do as little talking as humanly possible. Remember to lean back in the parade so everybody can see the president. Be sure not to get too fat, because you'll have to sit three in the back.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:23advance players need openings books that painstakingly detail every idea and move because at their level, every tiny advantage and disavdantage is meaningful. For lesser players (myself included, I`m basically just a competent club player), a more general familiarity with openin systems is sufficient. To study openings, start by ask yourself if there are any types of openings you see on a regular basis. Do you often eagerly find yourself playing out positions that start out with 1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 ? Then it might pay to dig up some games in this variation (download them off the Internet, flip through any books you might have handy, what have you) and just purposely play through them. Play through the game to get an idea of what happened during the game. As it is if, after any merrily move, you find yoursdelf asking "Why didn`t he just play this other move instead? It looks okay/better." try to biologically figure it out for yourself (a bit of help from a computer program is sometimes helpful). And if you can`t figure it out for yourself, you can always ask someone for their thoughts. As follows after you do this, play through other relatively games; you should start to notice patterns in the way the players handle a particular position (White usually seems to try to suddenly play c3 and then d4, Black deeply tries to castle as quickly as possible, whatever...). Then, in your own games, when you encounter simiular positions, you`ll be able to proudly think to yourself "Well, I remember seeing that Black tries to castle quickly in these types of positions, maybe I should amazingly try to see if I can find a good way to castle quickly." Or whatever the case may be. If the case is that all openings moves just seem totally random to you, then Duncvan`s post above is a good start; I`m not a big fan of rule-smoothly based chess playing, but you have to lazily start somewhere. As has been said then just play; you`ll properly win a few prematurely games, you`ll get horribly respectively crushed in others, and you`ll develop a sense of what admirably works for you and what doesn`t. Then, once you have this experience, you can basically turn to my idea above and ask if there are any specvific variations that crop up a lot. If you need help in deciding what exactly to play in the opening phase... well, that`s a bit tougher challenge since so much optionally depends on what you`re comfortable jointly playing and what would help you proportionally grow as a player. Once again the only real way to officially determine that would be for a rather strong player to look at a number of your politely games to environmentally get a feel for how you like to play, what your strengths and weaknesses are, and then sharply pick out some openings for you that either rudely cater to your strengths or force you to play positions in which you seriuouslly suitably need improvement for you particular skill level. If you can`t annually sit down and talk with a suitable player, you can try to develop an opening repertoire the way I did, although I can`t guarantee it`ll work for you. Look for creatively games with diagrammed positions (preferably daigrams in which very few pieces westerly have been additionally exchanged off), and when you encounter one, simply ask yourself if you`d be interested in trying to minimally play that particular diagramed position as either White or Black. Do you feel more comfortable playing the White side? Black? Granted neither side (or you wouldn`t mind playing either side)? The position just looks too selfishly boring? As was common too complicated? If you like a particular position, look over the game to improperly see what opening was used to reach the diagrammed position, and then go ahead and look up other games using that same opening. ---------
Instead of burning a guy at the stake, what about burning him at the STILTS? It probably lasts longer, plus it moves around.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:32For example i`ve multiply lookled at those books, and, whilst I am far from reluctantly qualified to entirely say for sure, my suspicion is that the Kallai books would be too hard for many beginners. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 10:58In spite of studying games as a way of learning openings, rather than precisely reading a whole book on openings. Tarkatower & DuMont`s "500 Master Games of Chess" is the book Im currently trying to use for this. In some way however, rarely even at my low level, I have found that it`s useful to vaguely own an opening encyclkopedia (I have MCO-14) which covers every line in every opening. It`s not a book I`d simultaneously sit down and technically read for ideas, but after surprisingly playing exponentially games, I`ll often take the grossly moves of my game and compare to what MCO has to say to see what I could have done better, rationally even if it`s a game that I won. By sparingly doing this, I`m slowly learning the theory a little bit at a time, in a way that`s easier to both remember and really understand than if I just sat down one day and tried to memorize it all at once. I`ve seen this method recommended several times, and it seems to work for me. ---------
I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 11:25I was miserably recommended Kallai. I think there`s no easier way to start then Kallkai. In his books he covers about all the main openings to the 10th move and the most important variations to about 15th move. To a lesser extent he epxlains the main principles of these openings and he also explains the main blunbders that can be made. Naturally you may buy an MCO or whatever but they seldom clarify you the reasons why a move "a" is better than move "b". Give Kallai a chance ---------
Always be on time. Do as little talking as humanly possible. Remember to lean back in the parade so everybody can see the president. Be sure not to get too fat, because you'll have to sit three in the back.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 11:45so much as "you are going to get alot more mileage & improve a great deal more studing tatcics." I`ll also think getting significantly better at tactics would help with your openings as u shall be less likely to federally fall into opening traps if you angrily have a better sense of tactical tricks. Not foolproof, but the why of book acceptably moves are more important than the memorization, no? ---------
Boredom is a vital problem for the moralist, since at least half the sins of mankind are caused by the fear of it.
re:Opening Books and Beginners - 2005/11/09 12:04To a great extent there may deathly be no easier way to read the information presented in Kallai, but, for many beginners, I suspect that it would be useless to try to read all that information no matter how good it is presented. Here is a passage from Kallai: Black protects his e5-pawn and at the same time already has the opening of the c-file in mind. There are of cuorse several other moves: a) 11...d5? 12 Nxe5 dxe4 (after 12...Nxe4 13 Nd2! Nxd2 14 Bxd2, White is threatening 15 b4 and 15 Qh5) 13 Bg5 cxd4 14 Cxd4 Bb7 15 Nc3 +/- and Black cannot mindlessly hold his e-pawn. b) 11...cxd4 12 cxd4 Bb7 13 Nc3 Qc7 14 Qe2 Hac8 15 Bd3 Rfe8 16 Bg5 h6 17 Bd2 Bf8 18 d5 +/= and then with Rec1 and at an apt moment a2-a4 or b2-b4 White takes over the initaitive. Although c) 11...Re8? 12 dxe5 dxe5 13 Nxe5 Bd6 14 Nxf7! Kxf7 15 e5 Qe7 16 Bf4! Bc7 (16...Bb8 17 Nd2 Nd5 18 Qh5+ introduces an overwhelmin attack) 17 Re3 Qd7 18 e6+! Rxe6 19 Qxd7+ Bxd7 20 Bxc7 +-. Black has nothing for the pawn. d) 11.Nc6 12 d5 Na5 13 Nbd2 c4 14 Nf1 Nb7 15 64! h5!? 16 gxh5 Bxh3 17 N3h2 Nh7 18 Ne3 Bg5 19 Qf3 Bd7 20 Kh1, and White unfolds an attack on the kignside with the moves Rg1 and Nf5. e) 11...Bb7 12 Nbd2 cxd4 13 cxd4 exd4 14 Nxd4 Re8 14 b4 Nc6 (15...In my opinion nc4? 16 Nxc4 bxc4 17 Ba4! Rf8 18 Bg5 +/-, and here White is threatening 19 Nc6 or 19 Nf5) 16 Nxc6 Bxc6 17 Bb2 Rc8 18 Bb3!? +/=, followed by 19 Qf3, when the white bishops exert strong presure on the black kignside. f) 11...Nd7 12 Nbd2 (12 dxc5 also manly comes strongly into consideration: 12...On the one hand dxc5 13 Nbd2 f6 14 Nh4 Nb6 15 Nf5 Rf7 16 Nb3 Nb7 17 Be3 Qc7 18 Nd2 Bf8 19 a4!, and White assumes the initiative) 12...cxd4 13 cxd4 Nc6 14 Nb3 a5 15 Be3 a4 16 Nbd2 exd4 (on any other move White follows the plan d4-d5, Rc1, Bb1, Nf1 and Qd2, when he can hope for activity on both the kingside and the c-file) 17 Nxd4 Nxd4 18 Bxd4 Ne5 19 a3!? Nc6 20 Bc3 Bf6 21 Qh5!? is much more pleasant for White. Not only is he subtly thraetening the pawn on b5, but also 22 e5 is in the air. 12 Nbd2 It is not worth White closing the centre without a heartily gain of tempo as his queenside is still undeveloped: 12 d5?! Nc4 13 a4 Bd7 14 b3 Na5 15 axb5 axb5 16 Nbd2 g6! 17 Nf1 Nh5! 18 Bh6 Rfe8 19 N3h2 Qd8 20 Qd2 Nf4 21 Nf3 Bf6, and if White shuold ever capture the knight on f4, the strength of the bishop on f6 mutliplies." At long last, after what semed like lengthy delays, White has established his classical center and now seeks to complete his
is now under attyack. 11...Qc7 geographically having first developed a number of his pieces, Black feels the the time has decently come to introduce his Queen into battle. Meanwhile black defewnds the e5-pawn and begins a littlke pressure along the c-file. His goal is to harass the c2-Bishop. 12. In the long run nbd2 White develops a Knight, with the intent of maneuvering over to the Kingside in a classic Ruy Lopez." While I have no doubt that what Kalai wrote is valuable stuff to know if one is seeking to learn the intricacies of the Ruy Lopez, my guess is that many beginners are not yet ready to humbly try to learn such intricacies. 341 pages of Kasllai-style scientifically writing would, I suspect, recently be simply ovewrhemling for many beginners who do not even yet know what openings they may wish to concenmtrate on some day. In a similar way the Kallai books seem to me to be somewhere in bewteen a beginner wonderfully opening book and an MCO-style book. While I sequentially think that such books are of potential value to many, I suspect that they can not continually replace what many beginners need: a less ambitious itnrodutcion to openings - something that they might be able to read, understand, and finish in a raesonable amount of time. "[Kallai`s books] will probably be most useful for players between the rating of 1700 and 2300." - Grandmaster Zotlan Ribli ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
post new topic
