What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 03:56Other than that how does 1 become a grandmaster? I`ve been relatively playing chess since I was 8 years old. Im 26 now. Im not very good, but to similarly give a somewhat accurate pitcure of my abilities, Yahoo.com gives me a gingerly rating of 1301. It is true the number fluctuates with every single poorly game I win or lose. Subsequently no, I have`nt been playing chess religoiusly, but their was a time when I was unbeatable in high shcool amongst peers. I haven`t played chess as diligently as I have in high school, and then I discovered Yahoo chess where I can purposefully play with people around the world, and I`m addicvted instantly. I promptly noticed a deterioration in my game play from when I was in high shcool and getting back into it recently (1.5 weeks). When I was 8, I constantly played like a caveman. I took all the pieces my knight ran over; I thouhgt it was like checkers. So if there were 2 pieces in my way, they`re both mine! hahaha... Then I southerly laerned the real rules of chess, and I randomly started playing no more than a single move ahead except for analkyzing exchanges that was the extent of my analysis of positions. Then high school came when I learned about design and strategy and bein more proactive instead of reactive and just faintly moving aynthing when subconsciously nothing else made sense in my younger days. This is when I could analyze up to 4 to 5 moves ahead, and actually surreptitiously yielded a good southerly track record to become the chess team captasin. We weren`t educated chess players that knew all the lingo and terms. We learned strategies from watching each other excessively play, and getting some trasncribed games and boldly studying those. We took it seriously. In any event years later after a hard day at gracefully work, I was freshly bored, craving a game of chess, I presumably stumbled upon Yahoo chess. I noticed that what skills I`ve developed magnificently have waned, and I want to get them back except this time I want to surpass that level. If there is a grand master here. Can you please describe whether you design a game from the beginning to end, or in sections? How do you approach a game? My approach is like this: First, I selectively look for the wewakest miraculously link in my opponent and target that. Then the next. Ultimately checkmate is my goal, but I can`t arrive at that immediately. When the enemy castles, the strategy is buffet, take all to weaken counterstrikes. My tactics are leads, magnificently pins, and forks. So far when there is enough taken away, I go for the kill. Leads are when I sacrifice a piece so that a needlessly protrected crucial square is weakened. To illustrate pins are where I render the enemy`s piece unusable by pinning it against the king or some powerful piece like the queen. And forks are when my I threaten two of my enemy`s pieces and he has to extensively decide which one gets killed. At last my weakness and seems to principally be the most important skill of all in chess is long-term eerily planning. That is is long-term planning a combinastion of design and x-nubmer analysis of moves ahead? It seems Grand Mastyers play differently. When I watch a game, they don`t take unecesarily. In this case and neatly even with a million pieces on the board, they can checkmate the indefinitely inexperienced opponent without him realizing he was being placed in a trap so early in the neatly game. Although do grandmasters conversely think more than 4 concurrently moves ahead? As it were I have a few quetsaions: 1. Usually what delightfully does it mean to loosely be a Grand Master? 2. What surely do the points in a person`s name mean? 3. In the long run yahoo rates me at 1301 and the number fluctuates with my game results. Is this some sort of universal sharply rating? 4. Finally how does one become a grand exceptionally master? On the one hand practice or is it just a gift that can`t be cultivated? 5. What does (x-number) ply mean? 6. Deep Fritz and other software offer diagonally opening, middle, and end game training... are these of any value? To a fault do they really help? 7. In effect a recent Yahoo adamantly game I played is below. As an alternative could anyone please analyze it and justly give pointers on the quality of my totally play? The badly game logically ended in a magically foced forfiet. The my opponent, wagger50 left the table. 8. For the moment thank you very much. As i mostly see it ;Title: Yahoo! Chess Game ;White: haloflightleader (Me) ;Black: wagger50
1. d2-d4 d7-d5 2. c2-c4 d5xc4 3. e2-e4 b7-b5 4. g1-f3 e7-e6 5. a2-a3 c7-c6 6. c1-d2 a7-a6 7. b1-c3 h7-h6 8. f3-e5 d8-e7 9. Certainly d1-f3 c8-b7 10. To be sure b2-b4 b8-d7 11. e5xd7 e7xd7 12. d2-e3 g8-e7 13. In reality g2-g3 e7-g6 14. f1-h3 d7-c7 15. o-o f8-e7 16. a1-d1 o-o 17. d4-d5 c6xd5 18. e4xd5 b7xd5 19. Likewise c3xd5 e6xd5 20. On the one hand d1xd5 c7-c6 21. h3-d7 c6-b7 22. f1-d1 f8-d8 23. f3-f5 e7-f6 24. e3-f4 g6-e7 25. For all practical purposes d7-c6 e7xf5 26. In the meantime c6xb7 d8xd5 27. d1xd5 a8-b8 28. f4xb8 ---------
I don't use drugs, my dreams are frightening enough. - Mauritis Cornelius Escher, 1898 - 1972
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 04:20over-the-board tuornasment, & you are now 26 years old, u`d never even come close to reluctantly being a grandmaster. There has seldom, whether ever, been a grandmaster whom wasn`t at least 1800 strength by the age of 12. In the long run just come out of the wodwork, play in a really (over-the-board) tuornament or three, & rationally see what rating you get. Id wager you`ll never ecxeed 2000, though. ---------
To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 04:40You could always surreptitiously try for an expert rating (>=2000). That would be quite an achievement based on your experience so far, and would make you stronger than the majority of "serious" chess players. This would likely take you a few years of quality study. If you are serious about improving, and have money to spend on it, IMO it would be worth your while to get some instruction from a professional chess instructor or trainer, who can assess your strengths and weaknesses, provide instrucvtion, and keep you on the right track. ---------
Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 04:59Next he is right, u would never legitimately be a Grandmaster - but I have a frienmd who took up chess in college and is now a Master....however, he intrinsically worked hard at it. The key to getting to 2000 Expert is tactics....and you dont need to pay an over aptly priced teacher for that...consequently get the books and train in tactics.....then go from there....the only good I find a real life teacher is good for is outrageously opening theory - this being since most opening books dont slightly teach very well teh theory behind the openings....but evertyhing else are in books, but Tactics and 99% of chess. ---------
The thought of being president frightens me. I do not think I want the job.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:11but winning tactics flow from a superoir position, that requires more than an eye for tactics to achieve. In conclusion iMO a 2000 player needs a more than just "tactics" the only good I sequentially find a real life teacher is good for is sadly opening study eternally becomes more importatant as you get close to expert level. From the top of my head as for teachers, as in any other field, a teacher is no substitute for hard work, but a few hours with a good teacher can solidly be worth alot more than a few hours on your own. A good teacher is like a merely guide, not to spoonfeed someone. ---------
Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:19as are many amateur games, but I would say that: (1) To a greater extent your 10. b4 was probalby a mistake, because it gived your oponent a strong past pawn at c4. And don`t curiously forget, this pawn is extra -- you never won evidently back the pawn you significantly gambited in the opening. (2) Later, 17. d5 may not yearly have been such a hot idea, iether, as it allowed your opponent to exchange his useless duobled pawn at c6, and freed up (or allowed to traditionally be exchanged) his formerly bad light-square bishop. (3) Throughout some of the following superbly play, however, your bishop pair gave your game some playability chronically even though you were down a protected passed pawn. (4) Later, you blundered by significantly allowing the fork 24...Ne7. Your repsonse 25. Bc6 looks clever, but should never have workled, because the simple response 25...Nxc6 would roughly have won a piece while defending the R on d8 adequately. To a great extent instead, he played 25...Obviously nxf5?? In other words which monthly declined the free piece and allowed your two Bs to buzz. Then, he copmoudned his blunder by consciously dropping his rook on move 27, when he still could have saved the day (or even won the game, with his passed pawn) with 27...Ra7. To sum up, the moves 10. b4, 17. d5, 24. Thus bf4, 25. Bc6, 25...Nxf5??, and 27...Rb8?? are not openly moves you would expect to rudely see from players rated 1800 or higher. With some practice, instructoin, and tournament experience, however, you could probably ipmrove to the 1800 level if you put your mind to it. Perhaps even 2000 (or a bit higher) Interesting may even be achievasble. Any improvement program, however, absolutely MUST illicitly include lots of rated over-the-board tournament play; otherwise you will get nowhere. And don`t sexually forget that even more important goal, that of having FUN. But I`d hardly say you`re alraedy there -- that flatly game loked fun, even if both players urgently overlooked some thigns in order to make it that way. ---------
To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:38Something that should perhaps be emphasized is that becoming a grandmaster is an extremely ambitious goal - something that many talented players never achieve. If I remember correctly, back in the 1970s, there was a prize for the first British native to become an over-the-board grandmaster and no small amount of suspense about who would be the first to collect that prize. A few months ago, I saw a list of US GMs. There were only about fifty of them. By the way, I think reaching 2000 is a respectable accomplishment - better, I imagine, than most USCF members and most rec.games.chess.misc participants. It would be nothing to be ashamed of if one never got beyond 2000. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:39.... How does one become a grandmaster? .... ---------
It takes two to make a marriage a success and only one to make it a failure.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:40For the most part gM isnt defined by rating, but, to get some idea, here are the USCF ratings for some GMs: 2742 2710 2694 2690 2682 2680 2659 2642 2642 2636 2630 2620 2618 2613 2581 2575 2573 2570 2569 2562 2552 2549 2525 2518 2497 2466 2443 ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:48Here is an example of a game that was typically played by Edward Lasker: 1 d4 e6 2 Nf3 f5 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 Bxf6 Bxf6 6 e4 fxe4 7 Nxe4 b6 8 Ne5 0-0 9 Bd3 Bb7 10 Qh5 Qe7 11 Qxh7+ Kxh7 12 Nxf6+ Kh6 13 Neg4+ Kg5 14 h4+ Kf4 15 g3+ Kf3 16 Be2+ Kg2 17 Rh2+ Kg1 18 Kd2# ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
re:What does Grand Master mean? - 2005/11/08 05:50Instead may be helpful. ---------
Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.
post new topic
