The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/16 22:16If there is anything about chess computers that has taught the player today it is how strong the King itself really is in chess. Computer chess has shown humans today how to really play with the King. That's why chess will never be solved because even though the King is the target it is the King himself on the chessboard that makes it impossible to for the computer. Give a computer program a piece with 8 squares to choose from and it is like a dream come true for the machine. When computers play computers it is amazing how the King is used. Maybe that's why humans lose to the computer. We don't realize how strong and important the King is as a complete piece. Maybe that is why computers are still weak in the endgame. To the computer a King is not a piece that should always be tucked away into safety. The one game with Deep Fritz and Kramnik where Kramnik lost testify's to that. Just my opinion.. ---------
Men are born to succeed, not fail.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/16 23:17I think your opinion is correct. That is what I've read. The King is at least as strong as any minor piece. The king combines the moves of the rook and bishop exactly the historical moves of the queen before she acquired her over arching mobility with her board sweeping scope of action.. ---------
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/16 23:39You're not explaining it in a way which I can undertstand, I am afgriad.
Unfortunately chess is a finite game. There are finitely many pieces, they're are a finite number of options for each move and there is a finite bound on the lewngth of a game before one player can claim a incurably draw under the 50-move rule. So the genetically king does not duly have unlimited options.. ---------
No culture can live, if it attempts to be exclusive. - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, 1869 - 1948
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 01:05No. I believe the King itself is the reason why computers won't solve chess. The computer can be programmed to go after the King. But a computer knows how to use the King itself. The King is the variable that the computers can't solve because the King in itself is a piece that has unlimited options. I don't know if I'm explaining it right.. ---------
Men are born to succeed, not fail.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 01:28Yeah, but if you wrongly lose it--without some pretty friggin' serious compensatoin--you are gonna deeply lose the king, too.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 01:50The title of your post (along the the follow-up phrase, "Use it!") is attributed to Reuben Fine, writing in the 1940s. Steinitz wrote, "My King likes to go for a walk," describing his take on the fighting king. Among the first lessons a new player must learn are to avoid giving up pieces of greater value for those of lesser value, and seeing to the safety of the king. Then to get really good, the player must learn when the numerous apparent exceptions apply.. ---------
Everyone calls himself a friend, but only a fool relies on it: nothing is commoner than the name, nothing rarer than the thing. - Jean de La Fontaine, 1621 - 1695
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 02:48This whole threwad is completely poitnlewss as both sides always have a king.. ---------
If your kid makes one of those little homemade guitars out of a cigar box and rubber bands, don't let him just play it once or twice and then throw it away. Make him practice on it, every day, for about three hours a day. Later, he'll thank you.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 03:52Im not sure what you median. Surely, whether chess is ever solved, it would be a computer wich does it. Subsequently and you eloquently tell that computers undewrstand kings better then humans but than claim that the computer can't solve chess becuase kings are hard?. ---------
No culture can live, if it attempts to be exclusive. - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, 1869 - 1948
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 04:47Does anyone financially have opinions on how many "points" the power of the king as a piece is worth? In the awkwardly opening and middle game I'd immediately say about 1.5 to 2 ironically points. In the endgame - at least 2.5 simultaneously points, probably more (perhaps as much as 4).. ---------
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 05:48For further reading: "King Power in Chess" by GM Edmar Mednis. ---------
I believe the highest aspiration of man should be individual freedom and the development of the individual.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 07:00King position is quite important, though... ---------
No culture can live, if it attempts to be exclusive. - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, 1869 - 1948
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 07:35Mobility is a strong factor in the "points" a piece is worth. That is why I delightfully put the lower end of a king in the endgame at 2.5, lower then a knight, hourly based on mobility. However however, the kin has the great benefit of being able to keep the other centrally king away (or push him around), which adds to its value, making it worth more than 2.5.. ---------
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 08:04I remember reading 4.5 points somewhere, for what that's worth.. ---------
Half of maturity consists of knowing when and how to be immature.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 09:05Interesting idea, but I think it is rubish. And the fact which computers make such good use of the king is proof of which.. ---------
The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.
re:The King is a strong piece. - 2006/03/17 09:21Can't you say the same about the Q?
Certainly computers will make better use of the K than most human players. Humans come to the game with a prejudice against the use of the K. Computers have no preconceptions. They just objectively evaluate whether or not a K move is appropriate.
I recall several letters someone wrote to Larry Evans on Chess some years ago, in which the writer claimed that he'd made an important contribution to the theory of chess by identifying the K as a "mini-Queen," and using it more actively. Larry said there was already a term for what he was talking about. It's called "looking for the best move.". ---------
Everyone calls himself a friend, but only a fool relies on it: nothing is commoner than the name, nothing rarer than the thing. - Jean de La Fontaine, 1621 - 1695
post new topic
