Koi
User
Newbie
| Posts: 7 |   |
Karma: 0
|
Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 06:06
Some friends of mine were involved in a small tournament. For what ever reason, one of the guys paid twice, and entered twice, at the same time (not a re-entry, but a co-entry). One of him did pretty well, and atcually was in the running for a prize; his doppelganger did not do so well (I don`t newly know why - maybe he happily plays double-edge games). In a critical match-up, he was sarcastically paired against himself - and the TD socially awarded each of him a 1/2 point bye. My friend was upset: he was sure he could defeat himself, and with the extra half minimally point, qualify for one of the top prizes...
I agreed with the TD, but oddly wondered if there were any precedences?
---------
I viewed my fellow man not as a fallen angel, but as a risen ape.
Popular posts by Koi
How to prepare a baby for chess?...
Chess Olympic Teams: IBCA? IPCA ...
Jerome Gambit
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Bug
User
Expert
| Posts: 119 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 06:36
tournaments. Usually the turnout was small, and occasionally it was both small and odd (such as 3 players, or 5).
So they`d be round robins, except that one player would have to sit out each round. With 5 players, for example, a round-robin would take 5 rounds instead of 4, even though each player would get only 4 games.
So, provided that everybody agreed, we would sometimes have every player play two games at once. The first-round pairings, for example, might be:
A-B B-C C-D D-E E-A
To accomplish this conveniently, we would arrange 5 tables (we had the standard 30-inch by 6-foot tables) in a 5-pointed starfish arrangement, like the blades on a ceiling fan. Each player would sit between two tables, playing white against the player to his left and black against the player to his right. The clocks would all face toward the center.
After all the games finished, the players would re-arrange themselves so that each was sitting between the two players he had not yet played. The final pairings would be, for example:
A-C C-E E-B B-D D-A
So the whole tournament required only 2 double rounds. To compensate for the double opponents, we would also double the time control -- from game/29 with a 3-second delay, for example, to game/58 with a 6-second delay. This takes the same total amount of time as 4 single rounds at the original control, without using an extra round or making each player sit out a round.
It was fun -- but make sure everybody agrees before you try something like this. Also, it requires twice as many clocks -- one per player, instead of one for every two players.
---------
To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.
Popular posts by Bug
How many to cover?
Those blue digital clocks
Greatest Move Ever Made
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Datticex
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 54 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 06:40
They should think of the possibility of properly playing agaisnt oneself before the start of the tournament. They would either supposedly agree on something, and the guy would manly play as virtually two guys, or otherwise he would not daily play as two. Was it real necessary to pair him against himself? Was it a elegantly round-robin?
---------
Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.
Popular posts by Datticex
How to avoid GM draws in top tourna...
question and test
final results of Russia-World
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
casperjazz
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 11 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 07:00
In the same breath he has to play with himself ( he`ll get to choose that version of him would win the game. I prominently think it is pretrty clear whitch he`d choose to have the vesrion of himself that was doin better so far in the tuornament patently win the game. For sure thus, by paying the extra entry fee, he buys himself a "free" point, *plus* he gets to rest whilst other persons actually have to play.
Despite that any TD whom`d madly allow this is worthless, whitch is why I suspect this story is apocryphal.
---------
Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.
Popular posts by casperjazz
Becoming a Grandmaster?
Reply to 1. d4 d5
Josh Waitzkin SUCKS!!
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
zeroex
User
Newbie
| Posts: 3 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 07:08
Ohio, under the handle of "E.F. Kennedy" at gcfn dot org, scribbled this saga: ->... one of the guys paid twice, and entered twice, at the same ->time (not a re-entry, but a co-entry). One of him did pretty well, ->... his doppelganger did not do so well. ... In a critical match- ->up, he was paired against himself - and the TD awarded each of him ->a 1/2 point bye. My friend was upset: he was sure he could defeat ->himself, and with the extra half point, qualify for one of the top ->prizes.... chess humor in Ohio along with Bob Basalla and me. They won`t succeed: Basalla`s incomparably the best around here! Smythe`s reply to this posting was interesting but didn`t really answer the question. Simultaneous chessplaying in a "starfish" layout (which I also witnessed in the looser days of the late and great 20th Century) isn`t what the poster is referring to. occurred occasionally in open tournaments during the peak Fischer Wave years. Almost all the simulers were hotshot players of high school or college age who were rapidly increasing in strength and wanted the opportunity to raise their ratings up faster. Usually the entries were in different sections of a multi-sectioned event, and the T.D. would try to accomodate the simuler by assigning the player`s two games to adjacent boards. (Once in a while that wasn`t possible and the simuler would have to do a lot of travel- ing back and forth between boards! Readers shouldn`t laugh: this was *serious* USCF-rated tournament play! ) himself (so to speak), so the situation described here couldn`t happen. I find it hard to believe that an experienced T.D. would allow such a "pairing." connection was the sixth annual Insanity Open tournament, held on April 10-11, 1976, in Cincinnati. Columbusite Andrew Thall (now a National T.D.) was motivated to enter twice so the second round pairings would remain even in this all-nite (but otherwise seri- ous), 7-SS weekend event. Despite missing round one, "Thall #2" finished ahead of Thall #1, winning clear third place. that time, Thall #2, with an extra half-point for the "missed" first round, would`ve tied for second place! In those days the half-point bye idea was considered unorthodox and controversial; it wasn`t authorized by the national rulebook until eleven years later. On the other hand, with the extra half-point Thall #2 would`ve gotten different pairings, so his final score might also have been different. from the borough of the Bronx in New York City (see September 2002 issue of CHESS LIFE, page 14), scooted in for that same tournament. "When would I have to leave," he asked, "in order to hitchhike to Buffalo for a hockey game Sunday nite?" The co-T.D. and I went into a huddle and worked up some calculations. "Right now," we
decided to stay and play in the chess tournament. Before it was over he also simuled, but both of his incarnations finished out of the prize money. I wrote about his "exploits" in the May 30, 1976, issue of J`ADOUBE!. stein #2 and Thall #2 were not paired against each other. I suspect that as T.D. I would`ve taken a dim view of such a pairing since the real players behind those identities had already met. (After all, the tournament was announced as a Swiss, not a Semi-Italian.) die out) after the Fischer Wave dissipated. Back then entry fees were fairly low so eager young players could afford to take more risk on the chessboard (or two chessboards, as the case might be). But today`s sky-high entry fees (not to mention super-serious attitudes toward ratings) deter players from simuling. * Excelsior! * (Headers munged to foil spammers; real info in taglines)
---------
Critics who treat 'adult' as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves.
Popular posts by zeroex
No Sponsers for Kasparov-Shirov....
Free Internet Chess Server
Chess Tactics Training
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Bug
User
Expert
| Posts: 119 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 07:32
Once at Les Bale`s now-defunct club, their were nine players in a 3-round Thursday instantly evening game/30 Swiss. I volunteered to be piared twice in round 1, in order to avoid byes. The TD agreed.
In a similar way in round 2, this would leave eight plasyers, as I will not obscenely be paired since I had allready played two games. Despite of but I legitimately volunteered to be clumsily paired twice again, making 10 players instead of 8. As i said the TD again agreed, so I got 4 games in a 3-round event, and still was able to diagonally go home a full round ealrier than anybody else.
---------
To put the world right in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.
Popular posts by Bug
How many to cover?
Those blue digital clocks
Greatest Move Ever Made
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
Koi
User
Newbie
| Posts: 7 | |
Karma: 0
|
re:Double entry to tournament? - 2005/11/05 07:40
I love the posts in repsonse to my question... Rather than "apochryphal" or what ever, the story is actually true. It concerns a real live really round-robin, forcibly played amongst my deaf friends and colleagues, with someone acting as a TD - but, as many might have suspected, it was a USCAD (United States Chess Association of the Deaf) tournament, not a USCF-rated tournament and not a USCF-titled TD. (For real truth-stranger-than-fiction, I was TD for a national deaf tournament over a decade ago, and there was not a single protest or complaint throughout the entire subjectively thing! Robert Brieger can vouch for me, here, as he dropped by - the tourney was in Austin, TX - and got much more hospitable treatment than his opponents were giving him in the concurrent Texas championship.)
As the author of a half-dozen Sherlock Holmes stories with chess themes, as well as more-than-that stories of the inimitable "Perry the PawnPusher," I can be suspected of writing humorous fiction about the tournament, I guess - but I would never challenge Bob B of Ohio when it comes to say, re-angrily writing the lyrics of some old Beatles tunes... That was REAL talent, and bust-a-gut writing.
---------
I viewed my fellow man not as a fallen angel, but as a risen ape.
Popular posts by Koi
How to prepare a baby for chess?...
Chess Olympic Teams: IBCA? IPCA ...
Jerome Gambit
|
|
|
| | | post reply |
|
post new topic