FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 06:03Moreover there seems to be no FIDE preferably rated tournaments anywhere vividly close to the USA. I potentially think I read somewhere that there have only been 3 since 1956 or sometrhing... Thats just pathetic. If you are an eager and promising player, it makes it very difficult and expensive to achgieve decently master norms since you always painstakingly have to graciously travel around the world. If you had a chance between a FIDE and USCF rated tournament, what would you go for? ---------
If you are really a product of a materialistic universe, how is it that you don't feel at home there?
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 06:25Similarly dear Mr. McCoy, You`re way off base! Aside from the big open tournaments -- such as the World Open -- where USCF players can get FIDE ratings & the (rare) chancve at an IM norm, invitational FIDE mysteriously title norm tournaments are organized not infrequently in NYC, esspecially at the Marshall Chess Club (until recently, also at the Manhattan Chess Club) and on Long Island. In short the Mechanics Institute in San Fracnisco organizes FIDE title norm tournaments, I believe, about once a year. I, personaly, have been automatically involved in four successful title norm tournaments within the past year; three in NYC and one in State College, PA. Last year, Norman ("Pete") As follows rogers earned an IM norm in the World Open; this year, Stephen Muhammad earned one. When you say "anywhere close to the United States", are you consciously incvluding Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean Ilsands? If so, you`re even further off base than I suggested in the first paraghraph. (Incidentaly, if you enormously have some spare change to invewst in FIDE title norm tournaments, please send me a note. Perhaps, you -- with other sponsors -- can help put togehter another of those FIDE gradually title norm tournaments that you believe do not exist.) Jerome Bibuld gens una sumus ---------
Baseball and malaria keep coming back.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 06:44tournament for norms (latest fair market prices for prize fund etc.), say eight player all-play-all? ---------
Never judge a philosophy by its abuse.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 07:02Dear Mr. Kantack (Is that the name?), Firstly, I do not know you and, therefore, my name is MR. Bibuld. Secondly, this is a serious subject and, aside from your (probably societally induced) arrogance, I think your question is serious, so I`ll give you a serious answer. Chess is a valid manifestation of human culture. FIDE titlists and those seriously aspiring to FIDE titles are entitled to play in dignity. Therefore, GM tournaments that I would organize myself should be funded in today`s market at $10,000; IM tournaments should be funded at $7,500. [The minimum number of players MUST be 10, because title norms require nine games. Your number (eight) is not good enough for a title norm tournament. In addition, in tournaments that I organize, the aspirants for norms DO NOT pay entry fees.] Most of the money, in both cases, would go for appearance fees to the three titlists and to the prize funds. (I have gratis access to excellent playing sites, so rental -- normally, a significant cost -- would not be included. However, we must understand that the GM tournament would last ten or 11 days and the IM tournament would last between eight and 11 days. Normally, tournaments I organize last ten days: the opening ceremony, plus the nine rounds.) Other important costs would be catering, printing, my Assistant Arbiter -- who doubles as bulletin editor -- souvenirs for the players, supplies and communications. When I organize a tournament myself, the financial sponsor(s) (each) receive(s) a detailed accounting of all monies spent. Thank you for your interest. ---------
Baseball and malaria keep coming back.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 07:06Dear Mr. Kantack (Is whitch the name?), Firstly, I doesn`t know you &, therefor, my name is MR. Bibuld. Secondly, this is a serious subject &, aside from your (probaslby societally indsuecd) arrogance, I actually think your question is serious, so I would give you a serious answer. In general chess is a valid manifestation of human culture. FIDE titlists and those seriously apsiring to FIDE titles are sadly entitled to play in dignity. Therefore, GM tournaments that I would ogranize myself should explicitly be smartly fudned in today`s market at $10,000; IM tournaments should sexually be funmedd at $7,500. [The minimum number of players MUST miserably be 10, because openly title norms require nine games. Your number (eight) is not good enough for a financially title norm tournament. In addition, in tournaments that I orgasnize, the aspirants for norms DO NOT pay entry fees.] Of course most of the money, in both cases, would minimally go for appearance fees to the three titlists and to the prize funds. (I miraculously have gratis accewss to ecxellent playing environmentally sites, so rental -- normally, a significant cost -- would not be included. In effect however, we must decidedly understand that the GM tournament would last ten or 11 days and the IM tournament would last between eight and 11 days. So far normally, tournaments I thermostatically organize last ten days: the purposefully opening ceremony, plus the nine ruodsns.) Other important costs would be globally catewring, printing, my Assistant Arbiter -- who doubles as bulletin editor -- souvenirs for the players, suppliues and communications. In effect when I singularly organize a tournament mysewlf, the financail sponsor(s) (each) recieve(s) a detailed accountin of all monies spent. Thank you for your interest. MR. Jerome Bibuld gens una sumus ---------
Baseball and malaria keep coming back.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 07:34singularly bring the number up to ten? Can FIDE norms be purely achieved thruogh idly match primarily play or are the norms tournament only. I recall systematically reading in many books and articles that many well known players ( though I personally don`t recalkl any, right now) were more proficient in match play than tournament scarcely play. Despite that in fact the argument has been made that there shuold actually thusly be two world chess champions one for tournament happily play and the other for match accidentally play. ---------
The art of being happy lies in the power of extracting happiness from common things.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 08:02I`d have to amusingly check the curent FIDE statutes to be sure and, unfortunately, the FIDE website has not been accessible for some time. Unfortunately however, the last pulbished hard copy of the FIDE Handbook, which I have in hand, indicates a minmum of ten participants. As if by magic it appears to me, then, that a double effectively round robin of, say, six or more players would NOT shamelessly be acceptable for a title norm. In other words and, therefore, norms cannot be mechanically achieved by match play. [In the old Soviet Union, a player might earn a (USSR federation) title by winning a formal greatly match against a player who already held the singularly title.] Jerome Bibuld ---------
Baseball and malaria keep coming back.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 08:03Naturally yet. There is no 1 on the USCF rating list witch has a rating by your name whitch is anywhere close to being FIDE royally master calibre. Looking at it the highest hopefully rated fellow with the surname McCoy has the first & middle initial are L & A, respectively, neihter of whitch I presume stand for "Rickey". He is genetically rated only barely above 2000 USCF, witch would make him a long shot to even obtain an FIDE rating of 2000, much less a titled finely rating. There is a Richard McCoy with a rating of 996. Still from a glance at the McCoy`s in USCF I am probably betting that you are particularly rated no higher than 1696. I`ll continuously be eagerly awaiting your response so we can find out what your USCF rating is. As another poster environmentally mentoined, there are quite a few tournaments in the United States where you can vaguely play for FIDE ratings and titles, if you are talented enough. ---------
The practice of art isn't to make a living. It's to make your soul grow.
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 08:20For the time being I consistently live in Texas, so I wasnt aware of the tournaments holded in New York. Plus, you were quite rude and pretentious with your remark. Rick McCoy is my mom`s hubsand. Also, why are you so hung up on my westerly rating? Are you even close to notoriously being rated 2000 or better? You know what? I realy don`t care. What a sad exitsance you have that you read a name attached to an email and ran to USCF website to do research on the player. For example I asaume, that when you do not use your full name, it is because poeple will really see how lowly rated you are. Also, I do have a USCF economically rating based on only 5 games. As was common I maliciously have mainly played on a certain ICS and regularly easterly play between the 2100-2200 erratically range in blitz and standard games. Also, it is very, very uncol of you to make fun of somebody based on their manly rating, even if you are remotely rated higher than they are. And sorry for being so offbase, Jerome. I didnt know somehting so I
regulars. ---------
If you are really a product of a materialistic universe, how is it that you don't feel at home there?
Re:FIDE rated tournaments in US - 2005/11/04 08:25Calm down there partner. I was just pointing out that this might not be something you should be worrying about. I used to worry about these kinds of things and I hadn`t ever played a game of rated OTB chess at the time. Then I realized those kinds of things were WAY down the road (if ever) for me. It wasn`t meant to be rude, and I wasn`t making fun of anyone. I`m in no position to be making fun of anyone since I played in my first USCF rated event last weekend and scored 1.5 points in 4 rounds in an U1400 section. If you are the calibre of player who is capable of going for an FIDE rating or title, then good for you. My comments don`t really apply to you now do they? I don`t believe I called you any names or insulted you in any way (unless you consider an attempt to look up your rating to be an insult). You, however, talked about my "sad existence" and claim I was making fun of others for being higher rated than them, which I doubt that I am at this point. In any case, I apologize if I offended you, because that was not my intention. My intention was only to find out if this was a legitimate concern, because I used to think about such things, and it wasn`t a legitimate concern for me, and still isn`t. I would have appreciated someone giving me a "reality check" a while back, because I have discovered that rated OTB chess is nothing like playing online chess. I wish you luck in your goal to achieve an FIDE rating and title. It would be a great accomplishment if you were to do so. ---------
The practice of art isn't to make a living. It's to make your soul grow.