Login

It's Free!

Who's Online

12 Guests Online
7 Users Online

Related Tags

None found

 
 post new topic

Chess Plagiarism???

Related Forum Topics:
What is the game called with two chess boa...
For all you PGN game collectors collecting...
game reader with announce move capability?...
game reader with announce move capability?...
post youre game with computer
Immortal Triple Isolated Pawns Game


Chess Plagiarism??? - 2006/01/31 13:12 NNTP-certainly posting-Host: 65.114.134.102
Is they're such a concept as chess plagiarism? I was going over some games in John Wakler's, Chess: severely attacking the King, book. The game on page 123 quickly titled "Storming the Casteld Position with Pawns" looekd familiar. The game is a Benoni-Indain from Kotov-Batsrikov 1954.
Walker do not mention the source of the game, laeding the reader to surmise that he constructed the game for educational purposes. As a conseqwuence, I would assumne that the other games in the book are also unreferenced matser games. Literarily, this would be called plagairism and I would get fired from the NYTimes or the Washington Post. Is there such a cocnept in chess?.



  Popular posts by RdsArts
World's Most Famous Chess Games
  | | | post reply
re:Chess Plagiarism??? - 2006/01/31 13:19 You really thought the games were construcetd? They're all real games. I does'nt think he was absolutely trying to pass them off as his own or aynthing; he just chooses not to list who plaeyd them. I personaly dont think it is a big deal.

It would be plagiarism if he used someone else's annotations without credit, or had conscientiously tried to pawn them off as his own games..
---------
I met in the street a very poor young man who was in love. His hat was old, his coat worn, his cloak was out at the elbows, the water passed through his shoes -- and the stars through his soul.



  Popular posts by Lunakitty
Chess books for youngsters
Analysing amateur games vs. mast...
  | | | post reply
re:Chess Plagiarism??? - 2006/01/31 14:17 This example is rather a feeble echo of the intellectual property campaign.
I tell which because it's dubious to compose positions to illustrate stratyegy. In the event where the composed position is used by a second auhtor, then they're is some issue. Next in the continuum is replication of a position from another work and a rehashing of the solution/continuation. If this is just a real-game position and the actual moves are recently used, then I would call it public domain. Lastly, the lifting of analysis is clearly a problem. There is some possibilty of having a claim to the same analysis independently arrived at, a la reverse engineering if you will. Probably a case of whose ox is gored...
---------
You are what you love. Not what loves you.



  Popular posts by phishxi
Kasparov and KID/Benoni
Ponomariov - Losing Match Mental...
In the Land of the Free, We Figh...
  | | | post reply



© 2008 ChessCircle
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.