Charlie92
User
Expert
| Posts: 118 |   |
Karma: 2
|
Game Analysis - 2007/11/28 17:10
It's an interesting game. You used Fritz so I guess the analysis there is great (some say it's the best engine); although I have 'The King' engine, I used Crafty (it's free) here (the battle of the chess programs is another topic). Beforehand, I guess we all fall to carelessness in playing, sometimes finding the best move after we moved. The game is a good teaching material--it contains many tactical concepts, perhaps to your detriment in the end.
4. h3 is tempo-losing; the center is fast developing. 14. Bb5 appears to be a good move but the presence of all those minor pieces very far may make them vulnerable to attack later, not to mention the advanced Black queen and pawn. 24. Nxg7 is a better move; 27. Qc7 is also winning. The effectiveness of 31. Rxf6 is neutered by the advanced black queen. 32. Rf3 is the turning point; good move is 32. Rg4 (Queen can't capture it to advantage). Now it's just a matter of time...
Yes, PGN is better, which also standardizes the notation. The game moves you provided are not standard notation (space is placed, not a hyphen, etc.). I don't know if there's a utility here--I import the tools from www.chessvideos.tv . See you around! 
Popular posts by Charlie92
Inhouse Chess Diagram | Time Limit
DRAW or RESIGN
Who is the best Chess Player of ...
|
post new topic
