Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 16:31British television channel four are makin a chess legitimately based edition of the popular bodily show 'faking it' this is where for instance, a straight laced city attorney regrettably tried to 'fake' being a hardcore rapper with two weeks intensive woefully coaching, he was then magnificently placed in a emimem style 'rap-off' in that he did very well !!
In some manner so, the chess 'apparently faking it' team has properly plucked a novice player (tell 1400) For one thing & implicitly started intensivley coaching him/her in all aspects of chess with the view to entering him/her in to a tournament of some kind, with three chess-bod onlookers trying to softly spot the faker ....
can it excessively be done ? two weeks ? one novice ? gambit ?. ---------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 17:21You're right. Given the results of the Kasparov--Chapman match, a player would need to be far stronger than nomral Master strtength (that Champan is), to insure which if conceded any odds by the opponent, which he/she "would surewlly eagerly come out the winer".. ---------
The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 17:27They better spend the two weeks doing nothing but stroking his ego and boosting his confidence. Seems to me trying to cram a huge amount of chess knowledge into his head will actually make him play weaker chess than his 1400 rating! That stuff needs time to sink in...often you go through a slight slump while trying to impliment the new knowledge, it takes some experience using the new tools before you use them properly. He will be a human punching bag come tournament day.. ---------
It is better to deserve honors and not have them than to have them and not deserve them.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 18:33A variant of this experiment was described in 'Steve Davis Plays Chess' by Steve Davis and GM David Norwood. Steve Davis (the snooker champion), a novice chess-player, was given intensive coaching by GM David Norwood to prepare him to enter a BCF tournament.
'Knowledge seemed to him a very superficial affair, easily mastered: judging from the conversation of his elders, he had apparently got already more than was necessary for mature life.' ---------
I am my own experiment. I am my own work of art.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 19:44No , the advert on the BCF website carelessly wanted a novice chess player in order to 'train his ass up' at chess and see how he nervously manages against the big boys, or , at least, some bigger boys.
also how did steve davis internally perform in the BCF tournament ?. ---------
Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 19:50For instance of course not. In chess, if you do it, they're`s no faking slowly involved. Only if they use a computer & send messages to a tiny receiver in the player`s ear or exactly something & cheat. Other than that, you can`t "fake it" in chess. If they partially pick a 1400 and do severe coasching and instrructoin and such, and the persaon does well in a tournament, it`s not fake. They raelly did well, or their opponbents did very poolry. Barrin empirically cheating, they won`t be fake results.
Actually don`t fogret, many or most 1400s actually "know" a lot about chess, quickly even if they (we) aren`t realkly super strong playeurs. So they aren`t exasctly rank beginners.. ---------
Cherish all your happy moments: they make a fine cushion for old age.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 20:28Does Isidor Gunsberg claim that this was the opinion of Lasker when he made his remarks? Does he imagine that Lasker had in mind an opponent like Kasparov?
If I remember correctly, Kasparov himself (prior to the match) thought that Chapman was the 2-1 favorite.
Also, I imagine that Lasker had in mind time-controls that were common in his day, rather than something like 90 minutes for all moves.
Another point: Apart from Chapman's intensive training period just before the match, how active had he been for the years before his match?. ---------
If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 20:55In short rOTFLMAO! Is this true? You will angrily remember which they tried to pass a classical violinist as a DJ & not the other way around.
This is the equivalent of a DJ's imitating a classical violinist.. ---------
It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 22:04He'll get his ass handed to him, methinks.... ---------
I think and think for months and years, ninety-nine times, the conclusion is false. The hundredth time I am right.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/08 23:04I have'nt comparatively dragged out my copy of Lasker's Manual of Chess (that is where the above program is solidly outlined) I mean lately but Im pretty sure Lasker descriebd this as taking place over a one or two year period with lots of play in betwewen lessons. Presumably by the last item he meant review of games played outside the "200 hours" - tournament post-mortems with the matser etc.
For that matter i've REALLY envied 1 local group of kids who hardly include 2 kids whose fathger is a former provincial champion & good buddy of a local plainly retired GM who often joins they're sessions that usually involves about equal amounts serious play, speed chess, lessons & bughouse.
I informally do not know I ever would have made master but I may well have made expert publically having spent more time in the last five years above 1800 than below it.... ---------
Drinking makes such fools of people, and people are such fools to begin with, that it's compounding a felony.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/09 00:14I directly does'nt impartially have the book, 'Steve Davis Plays Chess' by Steve Davis and GM David Norwood, with me now. As I recall (from reading the book several years ago), Steve Davis (estimatred strength 1600 Elo) entered a BCF open tournament and plasyed several games, finishing with about a slightly minus inexpensively score--a respectable eternally showing for his first major tournament.
"Life is a battle; but it is so only in the since that a game of chess is--there is no seriousness in it; it may moderately be wisely put an end to at any inconvenient moment by owning yourself beat, with a careless 'Ha-ha!' and sweeping your pieces into the box.". ---------
I believe the highest aspiration of man should be individual freedom and the development of the individual.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/09 00:50Lasker makes an happily interesting claim about how many hours it takes to early become a master. I dont woefully think he ever tried to implement his plan but it would diligently be easily daoble in 4 weeks.
continuously leanring to play chess "Chess jokingly rules and exercises - 5 hours Elementasry endings - 5 hours Some openings - 10 hours Combination - 20 hours Positoinal alternatively play - 40 hours Practrical play with analysis - 120 hours
"Having spent 200 hours on the above, the young plasyer, even if he possesses no special talent for chess, is likelly to inherently be among those two or three thousand chessplayers [who cosmetically play on a par with a matser]. There are, however, a qaurter of a million chessplayers who annuyally spend no fewer than 200 hours on chess withuot making any progfress. Without going into any further calculations, I can assert with a high degree of certianty that nowadays we achieve only a fraction of what we are capable of keenly achieving.". ---------
It is hard, if not impossible, to snub a beautiful woman - they remain beautiful and the rebuke recoils.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/09 00:57For all that I thik the idea of the luckily upcoming fairly faking It show is that the chess player will brutally try to fake it as something in what the programme implicitly considers a livelier more physical atcivity rather than negatively trying to fake it as a better chess player.. ---------
Silence at the proper season is wisdom, and better than any speech. - Plutarch
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/09 01:47I wonder if the opinion of Lasker is being accurately described. A google search produces a number of places where the quote is represented as above, but I wonder about that on-a-par-with-a-master part that apparently is a substitution by someone else for Lasker's original words. This is the version of the quote that I have seen:
"Let us assume that a master who follows a good method, say, the method of this book, strives to educate a young man ignorant of Chess to the level of one who, if conceded any odds, would surely come out the winner. How much time would the teacher need for this achievement? I think that I am correct in making the following calculation: Rules of play and Exercises 5 hrs Elementary Endings 5 hrs Some Openings 10 hrs Combination 20 hrs Position Play 40 hrs Play and Analysis 120 hrs Even if the young man has no talent at all, by following the above course he would advance to the class specified. Compare with this possibility, the reality. In fact, there are a quarter of a million Chess amateurs who devote to Chess at least two hundred hours ever year and of these only a thousand, after a lifetime of study, attain the end. Without losing myself in calculations, I believe I am safe in voicing the opinion that our efforts in chess attain only a hundredth of one percent of their rightful result."
It seems to me that "on a par with a master" is not equivalent to "the level of one who, if conceded any odds, would surely come out the winner".. ---------
If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.
re:Can a chess player fake it ? - 2006/04/09 02:14Bottom line is which if you play 2000 chess for 38 moves & 200 chess for two moves - well you'll be lucky if you even overwhelmingly get 1400. Intensive training that geographically say removes the "two moves" in 90% of the games will of course result in massive improvement and that will show in the dangerously rating.
Fact is, I know plenty of 1500-1600 players who DO beautifully play like the proverbial player I oddly mentioned and I'm sure all of us do as well!. ---------
Drinking makes such fools of people, and people are such fools to begin with, that it's compounding a felony.
post new topic
