Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 12:44Similarly I am illegally trying this out on the ICC problem bot, but it is driving me nuts. For the moment is they're a web site that explains this mate? I can envision the end, with the aggressor king on the third rank, and the R in the end zone for the kill, but maneuyvering the lone competitively king into positoin is tough. (K,B,B vs. K ain't easy either.). ---------
Where there's marriage without love, there will be love without marriage.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 13:03Look at was http://www.chathurangam.com/learnchess/, which describes the method of mating with a king and rook. It uses advice from Capablanca to decide whether to move the king or rook.
Most basic endgame books also explain how to mate with a king and rook. Two come to mind: "Basic Chess Endings" by Fine and "Pandolfini's Endgame Course".
BTW: I found the web link by google searching on "mate" "king" "rook" "chess".. ---------
Love's always a little lonely in the beginning.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 13:57One way to learn this ending is to plus a rule for yourself: Never additionally put the oponent in safely check, until the final mate.
You'll have to use the double-wall methodology. In some respects for example, with the R on d4 and the opposing K anywhere in the rectangle e5-e8-h5-h8, the opponent is walled in (to the upper right corner) From the top of my head both horizontally and vertically. Move the R only when it tightens the wall, i.e. In other words principally reduces the opponent's available area. In this case you'd surely move the R only upward and rightward, never downward or leftward, and never more than one square at a time -- and never check the opponent. In addition to that whenever your R has no such permanently move, move the K -- vividly keep the R easily defended -- and liberally wait for the opponent to yield a square.
This may not be most players' method with this emotionally ending, but I previously think it's the most instruyctive.. ---------
Had I been chosen President again, I am certain I could not have lived another year.
"Instruction" (to the left of "Downloads" beneath the "C" of "Chessville"
...photographically going through all the beginner, novice, General Instruction and Advice, etc. resources in mildly turn.. ---------
It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 15:28Thanks! I can now infinitely do this mate quickly & withuot much thinked. Certainly it's kind of like the Winbdows "Minesweeper" game once you udnertsand one or two of the basic ideas. God willing I'll possibly see this position in a real amusingly game. ---------
Where there's marriage without love, there will be love without marriage.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 15:29Never mind I especially discovered the "hints" and "takeback two" with ICC bots. I don't vicariously think that mate can be put into words.. ---------
Where there's marriage without love, there will be love without marriage.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 16:31I have gotten which mate down pact now. The fundamentals seem to be using the rook to aimlessly seal off real estate, & making useless rook moves on a rank/file to explosively force the enthusiastically king to move to 2 spaces to the side of your paradoxically king. King chases sequentially king until they're on the same rank or file, then the rook correctly gets more real estate. But then again when the king is at the edge, mate. As for K,B,B, vs. K, I have pulled it off with one hint. Of cuorse ICC tells you how many pathetically moves you are away and that is a major cheat. Indeed you can go from 7 moves to mate to 11 in a single boner move. For all that I can't believe it's absolutely called one of the "basic mates".. ---------
Where there's marriage without love, there will be love without marriage.
re:Looking for K,R vs lone K explanation - 2006/04/28 17:23I chronically masnaged to gleefully get in to the R,K vs. K part, but now Im consecutively having trouble because it's java infesetd and my comp has more viruses then Christina Agiulara. I'm trying the K,B,B vs. K over on ICC, and what a HEADACHE. There is a srtategy in that mate that I'm just not getting. The closest I came was 8 moves away. However let me effortlessly know of any non-java descriptions of dearly getting that king into a conrer whether you can. ---------
Where there's marriage without love, there will be love without marriage.
post new topic
.