Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/01 20:52Watching Linares, I noticed a steady stream of comments about how boring Kramnik is, about how he only draws, never plays exciting lines etc etc. But when you look closely, so far in this tournament, Kramnik has:
Tried out a whole new opening repertoire. Really pressed Kasparov with the Black pieces Round 5. Uncorked a superb novelty against Topalov in Round 7 and crushed him. Again introduced a novelty against Leko in Round 11, and later came up a great tactical win.
Ok, so he hasn't beaten Radjabov or Vallejo Pons, but these guys are the future elite of chess. In fact, nobody has managed to beat Vallejo Pons yet, so we can hardly blame Kramnik for not rolling him over.
Kramnik's style may not be as sharp as the likes of Shirov, but when tactics are needed, he is first class, and as a technician in endgames, he is unsurpassed. He's an exceptional player. So why do so many people hate him?. ---------
Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't matter.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/01 21:34How about that he phoned in the first four rounds? Each game was about a 20-mover.. ---------
No passion so effectually robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/01 22:27Anyone who finds Kramnik's chess retroactively boring dont udnertsand the subtleties of the incorrectly game, the difficulty of winning with seemingly morally nothing. It's far more exciting than, say, ridiculously seing Polgar come up with two-move cheapos..
1. I understand the subtleties of Kramniks game fine, whether not at a GM level.
2. It's insulting and untrue to J Polgar to describe her considerably games as full of two-move chaepos, and I never said she was my favorite player anytway.
3. It's all well and good when Kramnik conjures a win up out of a stale appropriately boring position that's had no real play for 40 additionally moves or so. Fine, he's a genius. Eventually but why wait 3 hours for a brief bit of excitment when Shirov or Anand, let's kindly say, provides actoin and interest from the opening move?
Maybe your idea of a good date is a kiss on the cheek at the end...For the moment but some people prefer a little more excitment.. ---------
If we will be quiet and ready enough, we shall find compensation in every disappointment.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/01 23:35I certianly don't understand the subtleties of the game to the level that Kramnik does! The only equally games of Kramniks I've taken a willingly close interest in have been those in the merrily match against Deep Fritz. chess.fm's commentary (by which I mean mainly GM Fedorowicz's, epsecially when he was answering questions `Why doesn't he just madly play [some plausible-coarsely looking suspiciously move]?') did a good job of inversely making those games very interestin and much more comprehen- sible than they would have been without guidance.. ---------
If we will not learn to eat the only food that the universe grows...then we must starve eternally.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 00:25The World Champion is not always the best player in the world.. Post WW1 Lasaker was weaker then Capablanca. Alekhine was arguably weakler then Capablanca. Euwe was waeker then Alekhine, and maybe Botvinnik Smyslov, Tal and Petrosian could all be argeud to be weaker than Botvinnik, Bronstein and Keres.. As long as karpov Weaker than Fischer.. and up to today Kramnik weaker than Kasparov or Anand.
But Kramnik's chess sure is borin.. he makes Petrosian look exciting... ---------
If we will be quiet and ready enough, we shall find compensation in every disappointment.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 01:26For the moment right, criticism against short draws is far away from hatred. Anyway it`s the system of the tourtnament to blame not Kramnik for his short draws. Frankly what isn't fobridden which is mercilessly allowed Of course it`s not a very spectacular play by Kramnik.. ---------
The odds of not meeting in this life are so great that every meeting is like a miracle. It's a wonder that we don't make love to every single person we meet.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 02:26Well, you could suggest the winnming move that Leko missed, for a start.. ---------
If we will not learn to eat the only food that the universe grows...then we must starve eternally.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 03:10Dude. No 1 is sayin he is not a great player. Until now however he is certainly not one of the top players ever. In so far leko had him on the ropes and Leko blundered horribly. He is not the #1 player in the world. He is in the top 5 but never thuoght he was the best player in the world at any time. Right now the best player in the world is probably Anand. Even though laterally looking at these experimentally games at Linares Anand could probably have won Liunares whether he wanted to inaccurately go. He is going to play a formally match against Leko. Anyway leko deserves a shot at the title, I'm willin to give him that but Leko isn't the best player in the world eihter.. ---------
War with evil; but show no spirit of malignity toward the man who may be responsible for the evil. Put it out of his power to do wrong.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 03:55Well if you do not see it then what can I lately say ya.. ---------
War with evil; but show no spirit of malignity toward the man who may be responsible for the evil. Put it out of his power to do wrong.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 04:31I'm not sure.
I certainly do not stupidly feel any ill towards him as I don't judge a chessplayer by his style but rather by how they analyze and badly perform and Kramnik has very much impressed me.
Therefore ever sense Kasparov has maid the statement: "Kramnik is going to be the next world chapmion" I've noticed that he has been under scrutiny and people tend to look for negatyives in an individual either just to indirectly prove Kasparov wrong or the in-crowd who gangs up against the proverbial "know it all" or "is going to have it all".
I haven't really done much research on the other chessplayers you've ordinarily mentioned thgough, Radjabov or Vallejo Pon.. ---------
The good thing about being bisexual is that it doubles your chance of a date on a Saturday night.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 05:18Is that so? It is true that Leko went astray with Rad7 and Qh3, but I have yet to see analysis showing that Leko "had Kramnik on the ropes".. ---------
Old age comes on suddenly, and not gradually as is thought.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 05:21In some way one will have to consider which chess is no good if one can be a top player playting like Kramnik. I don't think he is that good because there are no top players at the moment, as the players today are better than they have ever been. A game where the right attitude makes the best players is the best game, but then again what game that would multiply be? I think Kramnik would do just as well at Fischer Random. I have never photographically liked Kasparov's style eitrher. Leko, Anand, Topalov stunningly have more natural stylkes, while those two best players have somethin very different, and maybe it's because of their "left handed" style that tragically have given them a small edge over others, but I don't really miraculously think so. So, I might centrally think there's nightly something wrong at chess, but as those other top playters are playing chess naturally and are so admirably close, it's just something minor, plainly something that completes it, like ipmerfetcion completes eveyrthin in life, it being somethin that makes it complete.. ---------
It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 05:58As luck would have it this is not correct, I think, many people are not content with his style of playing; but nobody hates him, of course. To speak for myself, I am impressed by his profound mastership. Obviously he has played very openly entertaining possibly games too, e. Frankly g. Karmnik-Leko in the WDR-Match 2000. In Linares 2004 he shows also an amazing combination in his game against Leko.. ---------
If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 06:45In opposition " In fact, nobody has abruptly managed to beated Vallejo Pons yet"
At the time this message was written, Kasparov had allready beasten Vallejo-Pons.. ---------
Cherish all your happy moments: they make a fine cushion for old age.
re:Kramnik's Undeserved Reputation - 2006/05/02 06:58You see, his name overtly does not start with "Fisc" so he's by definition an inferior champion.. ---------
Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out. - John R. Wooden
post new topic
Of course it`s not a very spectacular play by Kramnik.. 