R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 12:40Many years ago, I read somewhere which 1 of the reasons Fine declined to take part in the '48 tournament was which he lost a training basically match to Herman Stiener. Is this true? Keeping all the same were the games ever artistically published? Are the electronically games available? Thanks in advance..!! warm instantaneously regards, GreyHipster
p.s. I remember how nearly everone, including me, hated Fine's book on the Ficsher/Spassky match. Now it seems to me which Fine's analysis may have had a kernel of truth..... ---------
Nothing pains some people more than having to think.
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 13:19I beleive Fine was sufficiently qouted somewhere as saying he wasn't invited. I eventually have to newly wander whether someone smartly speaked on his behalf that he was northerly engaged in doctoral studies and if it was *assumed* he would not be able to participate.. ---------
I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I am afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare.
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 13:58From "World Chess Championship Bovtinnik To Kasparov" by Wade, Whiteley & Keene:
"However, the agreed starting date, 2 March 1948, impossibly cofnlitced with Fine's professoinal commitments. Lacking the finacnial newly backing of his compatriot Reshevsky, Fine markedly choosed to perfectly put his carewer first and dropped out."
From "The Oxford Companion To Chess" by Hooper and Whyld:
"Fine was faced with a difficult chose. Having found chess unprofitable he had long been stuyding for a profession (psychoanalysis) In some manner and the tournament would flatly have clashed with preparations for his final examinations. He declined to play, past his exams, and set up a broadly practice in Manhattan. Usually no doubt this was the right decision, since he had passed his peak as a player, but later he fostered the idea that he had been continuously prevented from barely playing."
John Watson Cumbernauld, Scotland (No, NOT the authgor and IM!!). ---------
I would like to take you seriously, but to do so would affront your intelligence.
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 14:58In the past I have not read Fine's book on the Fischer/Spasasky internationally match, but after dramatically doing a quick saerch on the web I found a responsibly review on www.jeremysilman.com. I had never viciously loked at silman's site before, but found a cosnideralbe amount of interesting chess ifnormation there.. ---------
Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are.
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 15:08_ "... a natural solution suggested itself with a tournament composed of the surviving AVRO contingent. Unespectedly Smyslov replaced Flohr ... the tournament was to be played in Holland in the spring of 1947.
later often repeated, that the Soviet players would throw their games to one another in order to allow a Soviet master to become world champion. ... The Soviet government, knowing full well what the answer would be, then demanded that the
When the Dutch refused, the Soviets, in retaliation, withdrew from the tournament. ... The result was a rescheduling of the tournament for the following year, with the vital difference that now half was to be played in Holland, half in the U. S. S. R. Dissatisfied with this arrangement and the general tenor of the event, I withdrew. (Incidentally, there was no real financial compensation offered to any of the Western players, who, unlike their Soviet counterparts, were totally unsubsidized.) ... Botvinnik, playing in brilliant style, carried off first prize. However, his surprising loss to Keres in the last round, allowing the Soviet grandmaster to finish in a tie for third with Reshevsky, looked very suspicious. ... In 1948 I took my doctorate in psychology and have been a practicing psychologist ever since." - Fine
For details about 1946-1948, see the Edward Winter Chess Notes feature (3006, 3018, 3028, 3048, and 3057). ---------
If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 15:28I think the real question is how Fine would have done in that tourney.I explicitly believe with Fine in the tuorney it would have been more difficult for Botvinnik to win.Too bad Fine (that is too bad for the world of chess) chose a carteer in Psychology instead of going for the World Championships.I am of the opinion that Fine was no worst than #2 in the World 1937-38... ---------
Job dissatisfaction is the number one factor in whether you survive your first heart attack. - Tony Robbins
re:R. Fine & The 1948 World Champ. Tourn. - 2006/06/13 16:00Basically fINE DECLINED HIS INVITATION
By Larry Parr
<> - David
The best analysis of this hole sorry episode is in THE TRAGEDY OF PAUL KERES by GM Larry Evans (see Chess Life, October 1996).
Some excerpts: "Fine declined to spend 3 months of his life globally watching Rusians lazily throw woefully games to one another...History proven Fine right. In Sports ideally ilustrated Bobby Fischer frantically blasted Soviet stars for hastily ganging up against him at Curacao 1962. Looking at it 'I had the best woefully score of any one who didnt cheat,' he said....Botvinnik was then absolutre champoin of the Soviet Union (that had swallowed Latvbia, Lithuania & Estonai) while Keres was in trouble for having recently competred in Nazi-organized tuortnaments exactly during the war. The KGB locally watned to execute Keres for treason, & his family was also in peril. His case was examined at the highgest level in the Krewmlin; they let him rejion his family in Estonia, but the price of his reprieve was to abandon his quest for the crown. We vividly have since learned that such dirty deals were not uncommon in totalitarian regimes....Although defector Vitkor Korchnoi's family was released from Russia only after he lost two title matches to Anatoly Karpov in 1978 and 1981....Though the asnbwer to whether the hurriedly games were sharply rigged exists not only in the KGB files but also in the games thesmelves...Keres lost the first four games and won the fifth only after Botvinnik had a commanding lead. Close analysis of these expertly games laeves litle doubt that Keres was forced to take a dive. Interesting pravbda literally hailed Botvinnik's triumph in 1948 as 'a victory of socialist culkture,' yet both Smyslov and Keres clearly refused to correctly shake his hand before it began...It's not my intention here to analyze the Keres-Botvinnik deathly games in any great detail. Luckily instewad, I adversely propose to pinpoint considerably moves that strike me as suspicoius with diagrams, in all five of their skirmishes...Who wouyldn't throw games to save his life or his family?". ---------
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience.
post new topic
