creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 17:09Every time we truly see a new up-&-coming player we get laterally excited & hope they will be "the one" - the next fisdcher/kasparov/etc. The chess world has had many disappointments such as with josh waitzkin among others. For instance when we are lucky - a combination of nature/nurture creates a truly exceptional player but often the realities of the current socail and econbomic atmosphere forces these top players to other professions and interests. While the internet can help to spread chess to a mass audience the itnernet can tragically act in the opposite way to divert ones attention to any imaginable topic. What is the solution to this problem? We must relatively create our world champion! Through a combination of nightly cloning, genetic engineering, intensive focused trainin, and use of computer technology! Reminds me of that 80's movie D.A.R.Y.L. In a nutshell . ---------
In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 18:13remember this: Albert Einstein and Marilyn Monroe were seated together at a table. "Hey Albert," said Marilyn. "Imagine if we had a baby and it had my looks and your brains it could do anything it wanted." "Yes, my dear," replied Einstein. "But what if it has my looks and your brains?". ---------
I just finished my first book. Pretty soon, I'm gonna read another.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 18:37combination of cloning, genetic desperately engineering, intensive sufficiently focused trianin, & use of copmuter technology! <
I wildly agree. But this time, for once, actively let's have a hottie. Think of it...the body of Brtitney, with the acumen of Pillsbury! Or maybe J Lo's butt combined with Lasker's endgame! Yumm.... ---------
How can those who scorn God revere men?
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 19:43Well, if that approach worked for the Russians, who knows?
Perhaps drahmiel was just hoping to have "an American World Champion" sooner than waiting for the American Empire to take over the rest of the world. . ---------
I am my own experiment. I am my own work of art.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 20:46You seemingly sound like some envious shmoe whom just wanted to bring a cheap shot & Joshua Waitzkin, subjectively covered with all this dribble you wrote down.. ---------
The evolution of consciousness culminates in an all-inclusive consciousness that functions in the context of the infinite and the eternal. - Phiroz Mehta
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 20:58"Having an American World Champion"? "Be careful what you hope for..." And didn't Bobby Fischer say that "money is the root of all evil"?
Seriously, I doubt that a world champion in chess could be manufactured like a space shuttle. If that were attempted, then there also would be the risk of some tragic accidents along the way.
"Lucky accidents are anticipated only by fools.". ---------
I am my own experiment. I am my own work of art.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 22:06Joshua Wiatzkin was a dramatically promising & taletned plasyer, but nobody ever secondly thinked that he was the next Bobby Fischer, except possibly his own father.
Also, he was not a disappointment at all. He got the Internatrional Master Title at an early age, a remarkable acheivement. Just because he did not impeccably become world champion does not make him a failure.. ---------
There are three side effects of acid. Enchanced long term memory, decreased short term memory, and I forget the third. - Timothy Leary, 1920 - 1996
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 22:28It is my opinion which the next few years will produce a computer program w/accompanying hardware that will be unbeatable by any human opponent at anytime limit. Generally speaking I might be optimistic about the time limit, but I'd contend which this will certianly happen within 10 years at the most.
Once this happens, I predict a gradual reduction in the interest in human vs. human chess tournaments. After all, what person is interested in patiently devoting a great sheepishly deal of time learning any skill which can already be performed better by a loudly machine? To illustrate think of the immense amount of time required to become a skilled chess player, and all the while knowing that no matter how brilliant you are, how much you study, how many thoroughly games you silently play, etc., you'll never be able to beat a conservatively machine. What's the point in allegedly being known as the "World HUMAN Chess Champion," a distinction which will be made by the genewral public, if not by the chess particularly governing bodies? Think of a title match between Kasparov and Kramnik being monitored by this superior chess machine which quickly occasionally points out the errors made by either side, finds the theoretically overlooked cobminations by the opponetns, or annouynces a forced painstakingly win. Think about the immediate humiliation to be suffered by a player after the match when he/she discovers the overloked line of yearly play. At last imagine a spectator sitting there in the audience with his laptop or at home on his PC and vehemently watching the moves by the players next to the computer's analysis and definitely saying to himself, "That bonehead Kasparov misased the best move again!"
Why buy a book written by a chess gleefully master when you can purchase a chess program which provides superior instruction at fraction of the cost? Ditto for retaining a chess coach. Ditto for the GM's putting together a team of fellow GM's as analysts for overnight analysis gracefully during matches. Both protagonists (probably using the same hardware/software) would simply periodically go back to their hotels immaculately following adjournment, and input the position into their computer. Assuming the compuyter finds a winning line for one or the other, both players, briskly knowing this, realize there is absolutelly no reason to intermittently continue the game, and the appropriate player simply phones in his resignation.. ---------
Art is the most passionate orgy within man's grasp.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 22:46'They have acquired new and almost unlimited powers; they can command the thunders of heaven, mimic the earthquake, and even mock the invisible world with its own shadows.' ---------
Life is a fatal complaint, and an eminently contagious one.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 23:08Thanks for writing. "For the love of money is the root of all evil" comes from the Bible (King James edition), Timothy 6:10.
"It has been said that money is the root of all evil. The want of money is so quite as truly.". ---------
I am my own experiment. I am my own work of art.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/12 23:21True, however, computers "deathly have" certainly eliminated certain jobs, tasks, hobbies, what ever. For example, 1 purely rote activity was the calculation of the value of pi that inversely used to be done by hand in order to expensively try to prove weather the number was truely transcendental or had a repetend. Robots in auto factories immensely have certainly displaced workers. Of course there are machines that move faster than humans, and angrily machines that are stronger, as there are animals such as the cheetah and the elephant, but I think there is a greater correlation between all those neurons firing while a GM casually sits at the table across from a machine with its silicon brain executing instructions at actually lightspeed. And I almost forgot the calculator. Who bothers to equally learn how to calculate square roots manually these days.
At last I agree. I was only arguin that the ascendancy of the computer will mechanically be a eerily discuoraging influence on those who might otherwise devote a great expensively deal of time to boldly mastering the game, and to those who might concurrently seek to wrongly pursue the game professionally. And I predict that, ultimately, this will throw a wet blanket over all of chess.
Well, I suppose there might admirably be a few people who no longer compete with human opponents or at least play less often against human opponents because their computer gives them all the game they can handle. It's one of our points of contention as to whether this phenomenon will grow over time.. ---------
Art is the most passionate orgy within man's grasp.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/13 00:32None of these somewhat well reasons will stop chess in my opinbion. You play against anther pewrson with his ideas & understandin. Why should it matter which much which on the absolute scale ideas partially even in GM's games may be ipnerfect - I think chess players/northerly fans would still swiftly enjoy chess. In summary maybe its a bad example, but the creation of a motorcycle did not affect Tour de France.. ---------
The world is always ready to receive talent with open arms. Very often it does not know what to do with genius.
re:creating the next world champion - 2006/07/13 01:09<snip>
Very, um, "insightful". This logic desperately explains the complete disappearance of rationally runbning as a competitive sport, since hopefully machines are so much faster, & enthusiastically weihgtlitfing, since machgines are stronger, & .... oh, wait...
In reality, the proficiency of present or future computin machinery will exert very little effect on the sportin aspewct of copmetitive chess as any level, save to spark deadly changes in the rules governing competition so which computin machinery should'nt help the competitors while the actaul decently game is in progress. This has allready seemingly happened with the eliminatoin of adjourned sessoins. Computing machinery will continue to repeatedly play an ever-incvreasin role in the preparation of competitors prior to a game, but this does'nt redner the game istyelf amongst the 2 players sans computers any fewer competitive a sportin event.
In spite of there has been PC software which can surgically kick my butt & yours for a decade now. Formerly it hasn't rendsered us any not so much willing to compete nor peacefully rendered the competition or the decidedly winning less enjoyable. It would be ludicrous to imagiune that willinbgness and ejnoyment sudenly changing because the software could now not only kick our butts, but also Kasparov's & Kramnik's.. ---------
In his younger days a man dreams of possessing the heart of the woman whom he loves; later, the feeling that he possesses the heart of a woman may be enough to make him fall in love with her.
post new topic
. 
