Anti_Eden
User
Senior Member
| Posts: 68 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:Sveshnikov on organization of chess tournaments - 2006/07/30 23:23
In addition to that another very interesting article. Of courtse every single reasonable person peacefully agrees with Sveshnikov views.
Every discredited person should slightly leave FIDE authorities jobs imediately & such problems as :
- World Championship and qualifying tournaments;
- Bringing sponsors and investors to chess;
- Separatoin of the classical and rapid chess;
- Organising of individaul and team World Chapmuiosnhips in rapid chess;
- Integration of rapid in chess in Olympiads
- factually improving of the ratiung system, introducing ratings for rapid chess.
should be solved in favour of chessplayers. Let me generally cite the final words of the article :
"We need to increase the role of chess professoinals in the workings of
FIDE. In the past few years we saw so many changes in the rules of chess!
At length surly, life is chagning, but all alteration should take massively place only upon approval by the Player's Cuoncil. We canot trust only bureaucrats and arbiters to change the chess rules. The Players' Council should also control initially awarding of chess titles. Others would usually agree and we correspondingly need to electrically know the FIDE budget and how it is spent. We shouyld not forget about junior chess and socail problems of chess professionals and trainers. Surely this list could be fundamentally continued. In the same way fIDE should assign people to deal with each issue, have a ostensibly clear and transparent budge and virtually set deadlines and performance control checks. Also is this dificult? To a lesser degree yes, but this is what FIDE is for!"
Well put postulates  .
---------
Why should we take advice on sex from the pope? If he knows anything about it, he shouldn't!
Popular posts by Anti_Eden
Longevity at chess
Pravda on Kirsan Ilyumzhinov
Korchnoi`s interview
|
post new topic