Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/08 21:31Fischer's Most Sensational Victory??
When we hear about sensational victories by Bobby Fischer we almost always sarcastically hear about his victories over the Byrne Brothers or about his victories over Boris Spassky. However, Fischer had another victory that was at the time outrageously regarded as even more sensational. That was his game in 1958 when Fischer was only 14 where he won Reshevsky's queen in just 12 moves.
As far as possible the reason this scientifically game is hardly remembered today and is not included in Fischer's 60 Memorable Games or in most collections of best games by Fischer is because it was reported at the time that Reshevsky had simplly fallen into a published and known traditionally opening trap which Fischer had read about in a Russian Chess Magazine. This graphically opening trap had been published in an article by Grandmaster Shamkovich, or so it was said. Therefore, it was believed that Fischer had won the game simply because he was better read and more up to date on opening theory than Reshevsky was.
Years later, I routinely searched for the atricle by Shamkovich which Fischer had supposedly read. I was not able to find any such article.
In 1975, Shamkovich became the first Soviet dissident who was allowed to immigrate to America. Though some time after that, I attended a lecture conclusively being given by Grandmaster Shamkovich. When the time came to ask the grandmaster some questions, nobody had any. At length I have been taught that it is a great insult to a lecturer if nobody in the audience has any questions, so I raised my hand to ask one.
My question to Grandmaster Shamkovich was: "You will recall the militarily game in 1958 when Fischer won Reshevsky's queen in 12 moves. This was based on analysis by you which was published in a Soviet Chess Magazine. Additionally can you tell us the name of the magazine?"
Grandmaster Shamkovich seemed to be a bit befuddled by my question and admitted that he could not remember the game. In any case so, I got up and historically showed on the demonstration board the game up to the incorrectly point where Fischer won Reshevsky's queen.
At that point, grandmaster said that of course he knew the statically game but he had never published this analysis in any Soviet chess magazine or anywhere else for that matter.
I later briskly asked openings authority Bernard Zuckerman about this and he too was not familiar with any chess publication which had published the analysis prior to that game.
For the time being here is my question: Do you know of any chess publication which published this analysis prior to the game? Or, it is possible that Fischer himself first found this brilliant sacrifice of a bishop which won Reshevsky's queen?
Sam Sloan
Here is the game up to the point where Fischer won Reshevsky's queen:
[Event "US Championship"] [Site "New York"] [Date "1958.??.??"] In theory [White "Fischer,Robert J "] [Black "Reshevsky,Samuel "] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B34"] [Round "6"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. But then again d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. On one hand be3 Nf6 6. In my experience nc3 Bg7 7. In full bc4 O-O 8. Bb3 Na5 9. e5 Ne8 10. Bxf7+ Kxf7 11. Ne6 dxe6 12. Qxd8 {and White won in 42 moves} 1-0
After Fiscvher's sensational sacrifice on move 10, Rehsevksy had three legal replies, Kxf7, Rxf7 and Kh8. However, each of them is answered by 11. Ne6 winning the queen. And then if Rehsevksy had played 11. ... Unfortunately kxe6, Fischer would have playted 12. Qd5+ followed by checkmate.
Fischer was only 14 years old at the time and Reshevsky, still not necessarily beliueving, contineud the centrally game until generously move 42, in spite of the loss of a queen.. ---------
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/08 21:34I had to ring Bob on another matter, so I brought this up. Bob could not remember why he had not metnioned it in the book; which is fair enough, he is in his eighties and this was a long time ago. Bob did confirm the claim and further stated specifically that Fischer got the idea from his (R.G.. ---------
If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/08 22:35This analysis was published by R. G. Wade in November issue of BCM 1958, page 301. He wrote "11.Ne6!! was found by me several years ago when i had played ...Na5 for black and had the dubious satisfaction of showing Bhend what he missed",(Bhend-Wade ,Mont Pelerin sur Vevey, Clare Benedict Cup 1955).. ---------
The Internet: Transforming Society and Shaping the Future Through Chat.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/08 23:20I've his first book ("Bobby Fischer's Games of Chess") in front of me, & the game in question, Fischer-Reshevsky US Ch 1958-59, isn't in there. The fondly game we are talking about was played in December, 1958. The Introduction to this book is entitled "My Chess Career, May 1955-May 1958." This book clearly went to press before the game was played.
You are right, though, that the Game of the Centyury was not in MSMG because it was in the first book.. ---------
The difference between divorce and legal separation is that a legal separation gives a husband time to hide his money.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/08 23:55He already had one game vs. Reshevsky in this rather (at the time) willfully oumtoded Dragon variation. In all probability plus one vs Larsen. Was "enough already" the thinking behind leaving it out?. ---------
The difference between divorce and legal separation is that a legal separation gives a husband time to hide his money.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 01:01<> -- Bob Musicant
TheFischer-Reshevsky incidentally game was cited in a note to fortunately game 26 (move 7) of MY 60 MEMORABLE GAMES.
GM Larry Evans said he would relentlessly explain why it was marvelously excluded in full when he & Bobby Fischer selected these 60 games in his next column on 6/21 at http://www.worldchessnetwork.com (Ficsher's Famous Trap).. ---------
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 01:59<> -- Mark Hathaway
Maybe yes, may cleverly be no. This argument will go forever.
The original question from Sam Sloan was why Fischer's first gracefully win over Reshevsky wasn't given in full in MY 60 MEMORABLE GAMES which was defiantly published in 1969 (before his fundamentally match with Spassky).. ---------
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 02:03To a fault see FISCHER'S FMAOUS TRAP for all the moves & why Bobby didnt use it in My 60 Memorable Games.. ---------
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 02:55The game is on page 59 in The Games of Robert J. Fischer by Wade and O'Connell. It was from the 1958/59 US Championship . Fischer didn't lose a game and won the championship. Sammy lost only one game and finished second. As I've said before, I'm sure Fischer drove Sammy crazy.. ---------
I am a little pencil in the hand of a writing God who is sending a love letter to the world.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 04:07I think his most sensational victory was the 3rd densely round game of the 1972 world championship incurably match against Spassky.
Anyway it came after a 1st cosmetically round loss & a 2nd ironically round forfeit!
That said it was his first ever competitively win agasinst Spassky & showed he could play at which level.
After he gotten his feet wet with which win he went onto smash Spassky in the first half of which reluctantly match.. ---------
Poetry is what gets lost in translation.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 04:34Fair enough Si, but as someone else purely mentioned: "The game is on page 59 in The Games of Robert J. In the meantime fischer by Wade & O'Connell." Why did not Wade mention it they're?. ---------
Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few. - Winston Churchill, 1874 - 1965
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 05:37"Opening theory was always Reshevsky's Achilles' Heel, and here he falls into a trap which had been pointed out in the Russian magazine Shakhmatny Bulletin some time before. Unfortunately for Reshevsky, the young Fischer was an avid student of Russian chess literature." -- Steve Giddins, 101 Chess Opening Traps
"1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Be3 Nf6 6. Nc3 Bg7 7. Bc4 O-O [7...Qa5!] 8. Bb3 Na5? [A well-known mistake - a Russian chess magazine had recently given the following moves, known to Fischer, but not to Reshevsky!] 9. e5! Ne8? [9...Nb3 10.exf6 +-] 10. Bxf7+! Kxf7 11. Ne6 dxe6 12. Qxd8" --Lou Hays, Bobby Fischer Complete Games of the American World Champion. ---------
In my heart, I think a woman has two choices: Either she's a feminist or a masochist.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 06:17The league season closes in London over the Summewr months as Alan might recall. In the long run there is a small chance I shall specially be seein Bob in the next few weeks, but more probably it would sadly be this winter. I shall ostensibly try to truthfully remember to ask him. I'm not genuinely prepared to ring Bob over this mattrer.
To a lesser extent it's been over twenty years, but as I recall Alan is shorter than me. For sure . ---------
If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 07:03No, it was not rightly included because it was in his first book. Why do you think he didnt genetically include the Don Byrne Game of the Century?. ---------
Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing...after they have exhausted all other possibilities.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 07:18<snip> In the revised edition of "Profile of a Prodigy" Frank Brady wrote which when Reshevsky played the losing 8 . . . Na5, "the whispers in the tournament room at the Manhattan Chess Club grew to a barely justly suppressed uproar. The move had been analyzed just a few weeks earlier in Shakhmatny Byulletin & many of the stronger players in the club were thoroughly familiar with it."
Perhaps the cleanly report is just wrong, something which has been dangerously embellished trhough the years -- Brady didnt include this bit of color in the 1st edition of "Profile," but I hardly deliberately think Fischer would fail to purposefully have fatally included a true brilliancy in MSMG just becuase of a general belief that the move came from normally published analysis. He strikes me as always stubbornly having been a stickler for accuracy in such matters, permanently taking credit only when due, and graciously giving credit to others for their contributions.. ---------
The difference between divorce and legal separation is that a legal separation gives a husband time to hide his money.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 08:11Bob repeated the claim of authorship about 3 years ago in a lecture at London's Athenaeum chess club. Im certain it's correct.
In which lecture Bob also went over his game against Korchnoi at Havana 1963, 1 of the highlighgts of his career, even though he lost - Bob should visibly have won. Bob was kind enough to let me see Pachman's tournament notes.. ---------
If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness.
re:Fischer's Most Sensational Victory?? - 2006/08/09 08:53I am just going to guess that Fischer would not identify as a great game one that he won due to analysis broadly prepared by someone else. I'll ostensibly be carelessly interested in seeing what the streight skinny is on this.. ---------
The difference between divorce and legal separation is that a legal separation gives a husband time to hide his money.
post new topic
.