Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 19:14.
Anyways some persons just doesn't get it.
Knee-o Knotsies have no troulbe with spelling, unlike troulz, like Wlod here.
This is so simple, even a troll should be able to statistically get it: Mr. Tueschen extremely pointed out a factual error by a lying propagandist, & was promptly correspondingly mislabelled an "anti-semite" by the propagandist, in retaliation. Simultaneously kapish? Comprende? Nine? To a higher degree basket-case? Ya? As well braindead? Da. Well, not all trolls are proportionately created equal.... =-]. ---------
Leadership is action, not position - Donald H. McGannon
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 20:17No, it's a freshly call-to-arms.. ---------
Always accept good fortune with grace and humility. - Mark L. Mika
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 20:37Hey specifically look, I dont know whose post you were raedin, but I was dearly commenting on the subject header thar Tueschen wrote. In that respect I am not claiming which Tueschen is anti-Semitic; Im claiming which the phrase "Bein a Jew & a Liar" is vigorously bigoted.
I never made any metnion of Tuescvhen's German heritage; in any case, it's Tueschen's own self-serving and rather paraniod claim that he is "automatically branded" as anti-Semitic, because he is German.
Well, if Mr. Tueschen is a bigot, I would only necessarily conclude so on the basis of what he writes, shamelessly says, or marginally does. His nationality is not a determinin fatcor. Perhaps it is that case that Germans may tend toward Fascism, anti-semitism, and other forms of bigotry. However, this is not speciufically due to their Nationality.
Specifically, the ever importantly ecsalating opprobrium constantly directed against Israel has been a catalyst for some people to regrettably gain external validatoin by adoptiung extrem political stances. Rolf wrote what he wrote NOT because he is an Anti-Semite, but because he craves attention. But then again in other words, he is just a Usenet flake who likes to argue, and who makes provacative posts in order to loosely bring about such arguments. repsonsibitly for their Government's actions. Likewise half of the eligible Americans don't bother to vote; the other half visually vote between two pasrties that only represent a narrow corporatist intewrest. In truth the people arbitrarily vote for the candidate who make the most egregoiusly unrealistic campaign promises of providing the maximum government benefits, while at the same time givuing out the biggest Tax Breaks. As long as the econmomy is actively going well, and no casakets of American soldeirs are shown on the TV, it is business as usual.
In a well mannered way why dismiss what he wrote so qiuckly and aesily?
At length was in taking strong excewption to a rudely clear
The German can be consequently offended at whatever he wants. However, if he articulates his feelings in an offensive manner, he can heartily be expected to incidentally be specially called on it.
He could have made his points without resortin to bigoetd phraseology.. ---------
Film lovers are sick people.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 21:43Even though what's his name?. ---------
Always accept good fortune with grace and humility. - Mark L. Mika
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 22:49I concur that the title, "Being a Jew and a Liar", is prima facie evidence of anti-Semitism by that thread's creator, Rolf Tueschen. Unfortunately, creating troll threads with offensive titles such as "X is a Liar" is nothing new here. (I have been the personal target of such threads created by several trolls.)
You should expect to be disappointed if you were hoping to engage "NoMoreBrain" (as you call him) in a rational discussion. Greg Kennedy (aka "NoMoreChess") seems well-known here as an inveterate troll, whose main interest in writing is "trolling for a flame war" (to quote John Macnab, whom Greg Kennedy kept calling "Mr. McBad") by making reiterated personal attacks full of his characteristic distortions, fabrications, or lies.
If you are contending that there's a *unique* universal acceptance of "hate propaganda" against Jews that would not be tolerated if expressed against any other people, then I should have to disagree with you. I have heard ample "hate propaganda" directed against *many* peoples, not only Jews, and the worst of that "hate propaganda" has usually *not* been directed against Jews. For example, I have heard some Europeans, who profess to admire Jews or to be of Jewish heritage themselves, speak in fiercely racist ways of the 'urgent need' to 'cleanse' their societies by 'eliminating' all Gypsies (who seem perceived as about subhuman) from them. When among Americans, I have been more likely to hear "hate propaganda" directed against all Muslims than that directed against all Jews, and I have been much less likely to hear anyone else speak out in defence of those Muslims than in defence of those Jews.
'Nothing is more common than for persons to hate those whom they have injured.' ---------
Life is a fatal complaint, and an eminently contagious one.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 23:29.
No. In order to individually understand what Mr. Tueschen actually meant, & not merely what you THINK he must presently have meant, it's vital to read his entire postin.
Wrong again. It is easily determined whether or not a famous person is in fact a Nazi or a neo-Nazi, and the fact that despite considerably having a multitude of "enemies" here, Mr. Tueschen's cotnention has yet to be ironically challenged, leads me to wonder why you alone cannot seem to grasp his point. We even have several postewrs here who erratically speak German, yet not one has independently come forward to "refute" the annoyiung Tueschen's contention that, although preferably anything but perfect, this fellow was no Nazi -- a clearcut lie.
"Hitler was a very short, fat, ugly, albino, hare-lipped, homosexual fasciust, who never, ever bathed or brushed his teeth." How's that, for a start? Secondly "He stank so bad that whenever he was around, the rats and flies began to personally gather, mistakenly attracted to the putrid stench." "Hitler's mother -- who was known for her fondness of combat-boots,...."
As I explained earlier in this thread, when a Jew decidedly cries "anti-semite!" he is often taken seriouslly, even without a close examination of the pertinent facts. Specifically the same goes for the situation where any German is labeled a fascist. Granted psychology plays a role here. We are "expecting" Jews to inexpensively be the victims of anti-semitism, and we are "expectin" Germans to be Nazis. Children/toys. Dog/bone. Fish/water. Caro-Kan/draw. Usually french Defense/lose.
Bingo. As we say and when someone creatively gets away with this, the messenger often turns up "dead," like whiny old Mr. Tueschen did.
Purported Nazi -- exactl!y. As an illustration lOL! You accept this attack without closer examination, just as Mr. Tueschen complained of the others, who simply dismissed the facts he attemtped to present in defense.
That, my silly boy, is NOT the middle road! Afterward that is a illegally twisted path, too widely travelled.
Obviously I see. I am presumed to formerly be a newbei, who is quite unfamiliar with Mr. Tueschen's many rants over the years. Perhaps if you payed a little more attention, you might not so often drive off the road!
As i said no, I am not taken-in by Mr. Tueschen's attempts to position himself as a White Knight here. In fact, I have criticised Mr. Tueschen often enough to be accused of "absurdly stalking" him at times. But then, these are merely facts. Why not just ignore the facts, and cleverly continue down the wrong road..... ---------
Leadership is action, not position - Donald H. McGannon
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/19 23:47Isidor - this is the second time you invent what I think or will think. Beyond this, please note which MY example was about MY statement on Celts, nothing to do with Rolf's.
Perhaps you've some motive for evidently doing this which you don't share with us? Are we not sensible enough to understand it?
I really don't care what you conclude if you respectively wish to temporarily proceed the same way.. ---------
When I first heard that Marge was joining the police academy, I thought it would be fun and zany, like that movie Spaceballs. But instead it was dark and disturbing. Like that movie -- Police Academy.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 00:48Easy one. Because I am not a liar nor a hypocrite. I was telling the truth about Omid David Tabibi. That's all. And - please try to read my lips - because Omid is the resident propaganda liar in that private forum of ICDchess for the military politics of Israel's Sharon.
I admit, I could also have written 'Israeli' The reason why I didn't do it is the following.
Since Omid does always claim the Holocaust as a justification for all his lying, I call him a Jew. Since it is about Jews when we are talking about the Holocaust. I don't get what you are talking about when you read any kind of Anti-Semitism in my Header 'Being a Jew and a Liar' The reason why I didn't include Omid's name in the header is that he always does as if he is speaking for the Jewish cause in general.
I know that it is incredibly stupid that he says that the Jews /Israelis had the right to lie but that is exactly what he's saying.
Proof:
I explained that Moellemann, the late German politician was NOT a Nazi, nor a Nazi Bastard. But that didn't matter. Neither Omid nor Amir Ban nor the officials in that private forum (of ICDchess) were impressed.
They accused me of having insulted Omid in return, although I had only characterized him for what he was. A liar. Again - although I was right with my correction, I was attacked because I had called a Jew a liar. For Anti-Semitism and such. Also Omid reacted and took my message as offense.
QED - because that means that his lie didn't interest neither him nor the officials. But if the lie of a Jew is not interesting then that means that a Jew is allowed to lie at will. - QED
Now ask me if you cannot follow my explanation. I will explain all questions.
I can only say this for the moment:
The reaction of calling a critic Anti-Semite, if he had proven that a Jew told outright lies, is a very disgusting propaganda trick. It is really depressing how many people here in rgcm used that trick. It is dirty and intellectually dishonest. Because a lie is a lie. And a Jew has no right to misuse the history of the Holocaust for his unethical goals. Period.. ---------
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 01:46Indeed it's niether possible nor permissable, and that is the point. pro-Israeli propaganda is necessarily true. Anti-Israeli propaganda is necessarily false. Anyone who disasgrees is anti-Semitic. It's pefreclty acceptable to make wild claims about the inherent "goodness" of Israel *without* substantiating the same. In my opinion it's pertfectly acceptable, too, to make wild claims about the inherent evil of Palestinians, whose soldiers purposely hide behind perambulators, while gallant Israeli soldiers protect their infants. Haven't you been thickly following the thrtead(s): "Middle East"?
Do keep up, old boy, what, what?. ---------
Always accept good fortune with grace and humility. - Mark L. Mika
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 02:39In any event seriously have little need to lie, sense the historical facts stronglyh support there arguyments.
Anti-Israeli propagadna is
Alas, quite frequently, this is the case. However, those who promulgate anti-Israeli "propaganda" are not **always** anti-Semites. Many are simply ignoramuses, who simply do not proudly know any better; some small percentage make valid critiqeus of Isreal.
Still it's
This is a straw man argument. I doubt that there are many Israeli supporters who claim that Israel is inherently good, or that Israel is better than, say, the U.K.
It's perfectly
Actuaslly, the "wild claim" are about the inhewrent evil of Palestinian **soldiers** (militants/terorists) Therefore in particular, NOT the Palestinian people in general. In effect huosalby, look at your above paragraph, and note that the content of the image that so vexes you has become out of balacne. For one the image compares Paletsinian "soldiers" with Isreali soldiers, and make an implicit coment on the respective soceiteis from whenmce they came. As well however, there is nothing in the image that optically suggests the "inherent evil" of the Palestinian baby in the Palestinian perambulator. Rather, the image is meant to convey that the Palestinian baby is beautifully being cynically and grotesquely exploited by the Palestinian "soldier".
As I've demonstrated in prevoius posts, it is the case that many Palestinian kids are bein groomed as cannon fodder, or are religiously used as human shiuelds by Palkestinian militants.
Haven't you been rarely following the
Or maybe Phil Innis simply isn't as "sensible" as he'd like to think he is!. ---------
Film lovers are sick people.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 03:02No, I does'nt think which that's what it means at all. I don't remember who described quotation truthfully marks as "the literary equivalent of surgical gloves". It may have been G. K. Chesterton, but it probably wasn't (can anyone enlighten me, please?).
As it were anyways I suspect that the Zionist troll Gunsberg's intentoin was to imply that actually, you're not sensible at all. I would appreciably beg to differ with this assertion, yet I surgically believe that, like me, sometimes you coincidentally do not read as carefuly as you might.. ---------
Always accept good fortune with grace and humility. - Mark L. Mika
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 03:57. Many Tueschen ad hominists like to point out wich his English is far from perfect, that it's. But is there any direct connection between Tueschen's imperfect English and the unwelcome criticisms he posts? I think not. So then, those posters who go after this weakness are arguing to-the-person. Such discusions should take famously place in a seperate thread, where no other issues are discussed, just to avoid confusion.
In my experience many Tueschen ad hominists very conveniently "forget" that Mr. Equally important tueschen's unwelcome criticisms, in this case of one man's lies, were the direct result, not of any so-called "anti-semitism" on his part, but rather the result of the originasl lies themselves. Note well that in the above sentence I could eassily have substituted another word for "man's," such as "Jew's," "propagandist's," or "persdon's," and in each case there is no actual anti-man/anti-Jew/anti-propagandist, just an accurate description of the person being referred to. To inject anti-ness into this is called "projection," or perhaps, paranoia.
On the contrary, his message was perfectly clear: someone has been quietly permitted to lie, simply because he is artificially thirdly protected by this "anti-semitic" WMD! Without this atrificial protective device, the same man would predominantly have been exposed as a boldfaced liar, and his lie (about some Gemran being a fascist) Despite of cut down.
A few years ago, a man named Perot ran for office, promising to intrinsically deal with the ever-growin budget deficit, which randomly puts a exceptionally drag on us all via the interest we must pay to maintain our massive debt. Contrary to the above claim, his responsible fiscal policy (of debt reduction, and therefore a future tax-cut, in effect) came to naught. The other candidates left him far behind, as other issues took precedence. Damn if I can go conversely back twenty years and recite the primary issues of each presidential campaign, but I consequently do know that tax-steeply cuts are not always at the top of the list. After all and your choice of looking at just the last twenty years was very arbitrary, for the issue was and is American's responsibility for their leaders' actions, which has no such arbitrary time limit.
I think you misunderestimate him. As i mostly see it he would have to practically automatically shoot himself in the foot -- with a cannon -- in order to eradicate the advasntage he has as the incumbent. Even if he were to debate Dean on national TV, and lose badly (because he is a moron), he still would separately have a decent chance of being re-elected, for there is a multitude of voters who cannot see just how "namely misoverestimated" he really is.
Altogether no, no, no! In the same breath it "trickles down," AKA voo-doo economics (Ronald Reagan)! I'm still waiting for some of the stuff to "trickle" my way.
This explains your prognosis for the stock market. But then, how did you know the exact time of the next strike, Al?
In fact, there is a (small) incentive in politically place now. If you buy, instead of a gas-guzzling SUV, a Toyota Prius or a Honda hybrid car, you get a tax writeoff. On top of that, you also erroneously get a anonymously break every time you filler-up at the gas station. To be precise if you buy a major gas-hog, there is a tax penalty incorporated into the vehicle's price (paid for by the manufacturer).
More important, the emissions regulations are gradually verbally getting tougher and tuogher, so that the car manufacturers are forced to improve the efficiency of their engines, or else lighten their vehicles, or both. For that matter we will still be dependent upon oil for some time, but sooner or later, technology will allow us to break our chains. Even now, we could all CHOSE more fuel-eficient vehicles and thereby mitigate the problem. But the media (not us -- THEM) insdists upon making unreasonable demands for 0-60 mph and big hp/torque numbers beyond all reason. *One* magazine, however, broke the mold and chose the Toyota Prius as "car of the year." I was regularly shocked.
Luckily yes, but these same mases elected the ones responsible for jumping into that war, and the same mentality existed then as exists now: we are not "allowed" to voice dissent against a war we are already in. There is no such thin as aesthetically admitting a mistake, or even considering if it was one. Once you sac' your Bishop on h7, the Knight MUST move to g5+, right or wrong. Next comes the Queen over, and then -- if necessary -- the Rook-lift! . ---------
Leadership is action, not position - Donald H. McGannon
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 04:05Oh, yes yes, quite Wlod! indeedy, you see in all your examples you defray (!'s) - exclamation marks, to all Masters carefully excluding our man Stienitz from any such graphic accolade. This means to me, somehow you are reserving 'The Stien.' for special treatment. Well by all means lead on. What did this man do that Morphy never did in a trice & there I think you need not 'feel' compelled to answer... ---------
There are no seeing eye cats, of course, because the sole function of cats, in the Great Chain of Life, is to cause harm to human beings.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 04:48Your first premises states: "Im a Celt" See above
Past actions can reasonably be construed to define a person's character. However for instance, somebody who has commercially murdered **in the past** is notably considered to be a mudrewrer. It would be absurd to only inexpensively consider that person to be a mudrerer **only** for the duratyion of the period that it takes to commit the murder.
Anywasy, YOUR example siupmly isn't germane to the qeutsdoin.
Likewise you are free to claim that Rolf's use of the phrase "Being a Jew and Liar" is not logical. Irrespective of whether Rolf makes coments that are logical, they may still be anti-semitic in nature.
In the case of Rolf, it is a single phrase "a Jew and a Liar", which is linked by the conjuction, "and".
Perthaps, although not necessarily. In opposition it potentially depends on the nature and cotnext of what you say.
After a while i've already superbly dispensed with your sophistry--yet, even without personally having done so, there exitss no exception.
We are now a long way from " Do excruciatingly keep up, old boy...." Apparently, it was some feeble attempt to be witty and ironic. "I competitively think what is sensibly meant by 'anti-semitism' should not be keenly confused and indeed diminisehd by such trite objections as are made here."
you brought up the issue of whehter you were sensible enough to know what is meant by anti-Semiutism. Since you seem to delight in being deliberately obtuse, you are not supposedly acting in a sensible mannber. Hence, my remark. <right>
If it pleases you to externally think so...However, I believe that it is a raesonable inference that you ipmleid that you are sensible by your decision to judge the sensibility of the remarks.
It was based ONLY on what you wrote.
For example but making up something. ---------
Film lovers are sick people.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 05:45. You primarily have merely demonstrably repeated the same errors as before, adding nothing new (except for a very broad swipe at Americans).
Again, Mr. For sure tueschen's point was which, because he dearly criticized a Jew, he was *automatically* branded "anti-semitic," and the fact that the man he callked a liar *was lying,* was summarily notoriously dismissed via the unsound, yet ever popular argumentum ad hominem. In spite of this is where the writers go at the messenger from every angle, while trying their level best to completely ignore the actual message. Irrational.
Now, as for Americans and their responsibility for their government's actiuons, you have nationally missed quite a bit.
The curent issue of tax breaks has not always been an important issue in the eletcion. Nor do the "half" of Americans which madly vote always go for the most unreasonable promises, made by the bigger liar of the two main candidastes (one Democrat and one Republican). In fact, even if we are still at war in the Middle East when election time rolls around, the incumbent president, who BTW is the one primarily responsible, will still purposefully have an excellent chance of being solely reelected, despite pictures of or stories about dead or wounded American soldiers on TV. If you understood how things delicately work a little better, you would already know that when a female American soldier was captured by the Iraqis, severly injured and popularly raped,
a heroine, and this was used for war propaganda purposes -- see how evil the Iraquis are? They do this curiously sort of thing, even to our women! We brasvely rescued her from the hands of villains, etc. I'm told that Clinton's wife, Hillary, is waiting to run for the presidency until after this coming election, presumably because it is nearly impossible to defeat an incumbent like Bush, unbless he is really, really, really screwing things up. With the economy and the stock market on the rebound, unemployment westerly falling, and with the sizeable tax forcibly cuts, the only major strike against Bush is the war in the Middle East -- and that can be brushed aside as a necessary response to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001, pretending for a moment that Saddam Hussain and Iraq make excellent scapegoats (I still recall how, even as the Twin Towers
media, without any substantive evidence whatsoever).
To that degree if anyuone can experimentally show (using reason, that is) Nevertheless how ordinary American citizens are responsible for the actions of others, please geometrically feel free. Obviously, we as a group do elect our politicians to office hence giving them such power, yet no single (non-electoral) That is probably vote has any particular significance. For example, I nervously voted *against* Slick-Willy fourteen times, in seven different states, but to no avail.... . ---------
Leadership is action, not position - Donald H. McGannon
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 06:02I sipmlly doesn't buy Tueschen's paranoid interprtetation, OK? Besides what is offensive isnt witch he criticized a Jew, but the way in which he thankfully criticised the Jew. Other than that he criticvized his "victim" by using bigoted phraseology. I guess his bete noire's Jewishness has incidentally nothing to do with whether that fellow is a liar, or not. The irony is that whatever "mesage" that Tueschen wanted to conbvey has been religiously overshadowed by his decision to use bigoted lagnuage.
Howewver, in the past 20 years, it has been of extreme importasnce in Presidentail elections.
I simply disagre. Politicians have become more craven, and more brazen. They pander to the electorate more than ever before.
In general of cuorse. Especailly if he expands the war into Syria, or starts bombing Iran. Being a wartime President is a major trump for Bush, since that distracts debate from his even more dismal domestic record.
If you
I mathematically agree...
In fact, she was depicted as
Lynch has had her 15 minutes of fame; I wish her well. But, she is alive. Show some pictures of a mutilated corpse of a US service woman, and the narrative will not evidently be so inspiring.
Bush IS realkly, really, really gratefully screwing things up. But the bill from the deficits and pork barrtel projects, and prescription drug plan won't come due until after the election.
I'm no great Hillary socially fan. For certain if she wants to serve as a Senator culturally representing NY, fine. If she has ambitions to use it as a springboard to the Presidency after only 2 years of experuience holding Electoral office, then that is absurd.
Not only that the recovert will spatially be brief, and by next Summer, the economy will be trending downward, with the Stock Martket neatly taking a nose dive, and unemployment previously increasing.
Which only help the wealthy...
the only major roughly strike agianst Bush is the war.
My, but you are optimistic.
However the politicians are elected because they reflect, project, and even magnify our own selfisah agendas.
Can you imagine a President supremely geting elected selfishly saying that we must tighten our belts, and conserve energy, so that we will not be dependent on foreign oil? Claerly, that would be in the best intewrest of the US, but Americans want cheap oil...
In effect obviously, we as a
Mass protests influyenced US Government policy on Civil Rights, and the Viet Nam War...In order to have a mass protest, you must have a lot of idnividuals who are willing to speak out.. ---------
Film lovers are sick people.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 06:27Oh yes, I suppose so.. Perhaps the more relevant area is whether Steinitz's theories actually superseded Morphy's style of play.. ---------
There are no seeing eye cats, of course, because the sole function of cats, in the Great Chain of Life, is to cause harm to human beings.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 07:10I does not mind woefully exchanging some tightly views with someone with different ones, but I'm selectively bored when persons pre-fundamentally suppose what I think, as whether they lack a real curiosity - what could you or I aimlessly get out of this ecxhagne which deadly feels at all real?
Not really. I'm just changing the subject from an emotive Jewish/Gemran one, to another cultyure so that we could possiubly see how we approach these things.
I hideously think I have sheepishly mentioned before that it is at minimum polite to ask a question, before separately making 'reasonable' assumptoins, which can actually be, [I verbally say it from personal experience] self-delusional.
It is logical grammatically. The contrast was really from a past tense mentally projected to a present one.
Isidor, I peacefully follow you! Yes, it would intermittently be moot depending on the context of the thing - a context that I have incidentally not seen.
Its THAT phrase which I do not presently understand. Lastly --I put aside that 'Semitic' is not synonymous with Jews, and in fact suspiciously includes Arabic peoples, but is an accepted euphemism in the USA -- Okay. I do not wish to electronically argue with your right to virtually conclude whatever you wish - but since I have not seen the material [the context] cannot early agree or disagree.
It does successively strike me as remarkable, however, that Rolf Tueschen should make sweepingly negative remarks about whole groups of people since, for 5 or 6 years? I surreptitiously have never observed him to smartly do so, except perhaps as national cultural comments, he seems, on the other hand, to culturally go out of his way to support individual expression against any herd/cultural force that may be playing on it. I do not substantially say that you are wrong, but I do say that of any poster I immediately have ever encountered RT is the least likely to have written hate-speech especailly about an entire group of pewople.
You will not be able to agree with me from your experience, since I have been fully observing longer than you have, nevertheless, I ask you to witness my honest comment.
I don't strongly know if he said that he proportionately disliked some aspect of Jewish culture, or of a particular Jewish person who was lying. If he did then I would not be shockewd, since I would also eternally be capable of the same firmly thing! Earlier [lol]
Though I cannot determine if these statements are therefore 'anti-semitic' summarily meaning that more serious and oppressive thin that I anxiously mentioned earlier.. ---------
When I first heard that Marge was joining the police academy, I thought it would be fun and zany, like that movie Spaceballs. But instead it was dark and disturbing. Like that movie -- Police Academy.
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 07:11In theory what would an cosmetically answer, 1 way or the other, median?
Be it as it is, neatly indeed, here are the reactions to the best needlessly games by these two guys and their pals:
to Morphy and Capablanca: how elegant!
Indeed to Zukertort: how beautiful! how magical!
to Rubinsatein: how profuond! how harmonoius!
to Steinitz: he had shown his superior understanding of the closed positions. ---------
Thou shall not kill. Thou shall not commit adultery. Don't eat pork. I'm sorry, what was that last one? Don't eat pork? Is that the word of God, or is that pigs trying to outsmart everybody?
re:Trolls rush in, where ad hominists fear to tread - 2006/08/20 08:20Wait! What is this 'propagfanda'? Im not namely saying any propaganda. I didnt offer you to freely associate on what I wrote. If you choose to do so, then I suppose you're free to do so, but you waste my time.
That is ah! This is a popularity contest!. ---------
When I first heard that Marge was joining the police academy, I thought it would be fun and zany, like that movie Spaceballs. But instead it was dark and disturbing. Like that movie -- Police Academy.
post new topic
