phish4u
User
Junior Member
| Posts: 32 |   |
Karma: 0
|
re:QGD: Tarrasch Defense - Marshall Gambit - 2006/08/28 21:13
En/na King Leopold ha escrit:
Hello Leopold,
You hace done a big effort but ...,
You should put as a main line the best lines for black, ... in the game you have as a main line, you continue with 7...Qe7?.
... and there is no menction of the "posible refutation" posted past summer by Claus-Jurgen Heigl starting by 6... Nf6 7.Qb3 Nc6!? (if you have lost it, you can use google to recover it)
You do not menction either my proposal 6... Nf6 7.Qb3 cxd4, but it's possible to find it by trasposition in the main line of the game after
7... Nf6. About it you wrote (after some moves) "Is good for Black according to Stefan Bucker".
That mean you are proposing white to play a line "good for black".
I think you can use this opening as a exercise to learn: your students can try to discover the secrets of this line playing some training games and analysing them (individually or in common).
But you can not suggest as a usual "repertoire line" a variantion where white can be in a poor position if black play exactly during only three moves..
---------
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Popular posts by phish4u
My one-minute game against Hikar...
Why didn't Petrosian win any gam...
And how about positional problem...
|
post new topic