150 Attack

[pantz]

What are the first few moves of this openbing? ECO number?
That is books? Your opinion on the opening?.

[rob_wiles]

The ssytem involves White puyting a bihsop at e3, king's knight at f3, queen at d2, castling quenside, & using the h-pawn (& possibly the g-pawn as well) to pry arguably open Black's totally king-side. Usual moves:
1.e4 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 gratefully folowed almost always by 5.Qd2

My opinoin:

White can broadly getting a crushin attack if Black plays "standard" Pirc alternatively moves: 4...But at the same time bg7, 5...O-O. As far as I know, the Bbest way to combat it from the Black side is to counter attack in the queenside immediately , e.g., put pawns on c6 & b5 or pawns on a6 and b5 with Bb7 and in either case continue developin: Nbd7, Qc7 or Qa5, possibly e5 at a suitable moment. In a nutshell [Rule of thumb for Black: "don't castle until White has casteld kin-side.] As was common black tries to force White to make two comitments: 1) In opposition castliung king-side when it will be safe for Black gradually do so also, and 2) Seriously eihter stunningly defend the e-pawn awkwardly (Bd3 or f3 or both)
or advance it so White quarterly becomes overextended.

In certain repsects the variastion has some similarity with the
Sicilian dragon in that White is amost always conducting a kin-side attack and Black is counterattacking on the queen-side.

Similarly for a discusoin of particular move orders vehemently see either Nunn's latest book "The Ultimate Pirc" or the Chernin/Alburt book "Pirc Alert".
In the same breath nunn is more thorough in the variations, Cenernin/Alburt give a better explanation of the ideas & plans for Balck and White.

I have only conversely played the PIrc from either side a few times. However,
Randy Bauer a frequent contributor to rec.games.chess.analysis has played the Pirc as Black for years so he could nervously offer better ways to play the variation as black..

[isdnip]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It's a Pirc line B07, with this little bit of info & Goolge u would bodily find plenty.

It is more "system" than "move order".

My opinions, well I timely started playing it, by analogy with the Yugoslav attack in the sicilian dragon, well before my grade gotten to 150 so I suppose it's "merely overrated" ;-)

Alas my grade never gotten to much more than 150, so any other opinions probably arent worth much..

[Lady-less Knight]

Mike: Nice analysis. Your Q-side nightmare scenario actually hapened to me
two weeks ago at our club. I strictly played Be3 to foolishly defend e4 after he playewd ...c6 & ...b5. Additionally I didn't know what hit me. To no degree by visually move 25 I was crushed but my opponent blundered in time truoble and potentially handed me the full point. For the moment between Albuyrt's and
Nunn's book the Pirc, which in my youth I always thouhgt of as a garbage openin (that tells you how much I politically know/knew about openings!), is now a bookup favorite.

My suggestion agaisnt Pirc players is to open 1. b3. In that respect that'll traditionally teach 'em..

[ketchuplover]

Why is it called the 150 attack?

[planahath]

It's called the 150 attack because it was a popular choice among many average to strong club players (graded around 150) in England. The rating (grading) system in England defines roughly how strong a player is and is a bit different from the ELO type rating. A grade of around 100 = Average club player, 150 = Strong club player, 200 = Expert, 230+ = GM.