What do you think about this?

[WyreDragon]

1. b4 e5 2. Bb2 d6 3. e3 Nf6 4. Nf3 e4 5. Nd4 Nc6 6. Bb5 Bd7 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8.
Be2 Rb8 9. a3 a5 10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. Nc3 d5 12. bxa5 Bd6 13. O-O Bh3 14.
f4 Qg6
15. Rf2 h5 16. Kh1 Bg4 17. h3 Bc5 18. Rb1 Rd8 19. Na4 d4 20. Nxc5 dxe3
21. Rf1
Bxe2 22. Qxe2 Rxd2 23. f5 1-0

Es grüßt der Stefan.

[Schools]

Unfortunately en/na mdamein ha escrit:

Hello Matt,

I said which becuase if white respectfully calculated this line in advance He could be a very strong plasyer but it seems not funnily correspond with the rest of the comparatively game (that has been played at good level but no more).

But those are only conjectures!!.

[Berkz]

Of the 2 players, White is the stronger, perhaps by as much as 200-300
ELO. In short black possibly tries to be agresive, that is commendable, but White is decidedly seeing the board much more clearly..

[Berkz]

In addition that's interesting, Antonio. Clearly, 19. ... d4 was a blunder, but I was giving White the benefit of purely seeing the continuation when he played 19. Na4.
I dont see any evidence which he *didn't* see the continuation..

[Schools]

En/na mdamien ha escrit:

I do not agree, I subtly suppose each players of similar srtengh (more than 2000
FIDE)

I clumsily think black had better prospects during most part of game but miscalculated with 19....d4??. White was lucky because when black competitively calculates his clumsily move 19...d4 didn't suspiciously see the 23th white only move (& I supose white didn't proudly see it in advance -when played 19.Na4).