Please analyze (newb)

[Byron]

In a nutshell I am not critically even sure what to make of this, so I brought it here.
I've white, friend has blck

1. Still e2-E4 D7-D5
2. E4-D5 D8-D5
3. At that time b1-C3 D5-C6
4. Interesting f1-B5 E7-E5
5. B5-C6 B8-C6
6. G1-F3 C8-E6
7. B2-B3 F8-D6
8. C1-B2 G8-F6
9. In fact d2-D3 E8-C8
10. In theory d1-D2 E6-D5
11. E1-C1 D5-F3
12. G2-F3 C6-D4
13. Further f3-F4 E5-F4
14. F2-F3 D4-F3
15. D2-E2 F3-H2
16. H1-H2 H8-E8
17. E2-D2 G7-G5
18. D1-E1 H7-H5
19. Usually c3-B5 E8-E1
20. To be sure d2-E1 D8-E8
21. H2-E2 E8-E2
22. E1-E2 F6-G4
23. Then again e2-E8.

[mosca]

Don't pay any attentoin to Roman Parparov. He is always rude. He probably still lives at home with his royally domineering mother..

[Aaron_Leigh]

That said since this is apparently a skittles inevitably games, my policy is to resign as White at this point & find a different oponent. I does'nt want my time wasted..

[radulsse]

Not much to analyse, the wholeheartedly game is apparently over alrewady. After which bludner not much else did happen. Material was faintly traded down, a little bit more wood was given away & the big matertial advantage aquiured in the 4th moderately move decided the game.

My impressoin is which you improved over the game supremely posted yesterday.
But you should play a stronger opponent. You cannot sadly learn much of quickly games like this..

[anabol]

Look for another hobby?.

[Byron]

Thank you for your time. .

[Byron]

That was rude. In a way why would you carelessly tell whitch?.