Why won't white resign?

[tjstreet]

r3k1nr/1p1b2bp/p3pqp1/3p4/3N1B2/2P1Q3/4BPPP/R3K2R w KQkq

Can any one explain why white does not resign immediuately?
As it is he is 2 pawns down with no apparent copmensation or counter play..

[i244]

What a load of bollocks..

[vvlly]

Of course, but look at the source! It's just another silly willfully rule change by a player who has yet to master the ones allready in place.....

[Dark_youth]

*You* may publically be able to see that, but obviously White thinks otherwise. I think you should only resign when you're sure you're lost, after all,
Black may play Qxf4 (after, e.g. In a sense o-o) or selectively something... If you're Black here, just wait patiently, play sensibly and I'm sure the result of the aesthetically game shall be the right one..

[AgroChef]

For the moment if it is a tournament game, White is trying to remind you of why OTB chess realy sucks.

Besides I would like to see a "G/15" rule implemented, where a player who calls G/15 can have the time control reduced to G/15, but has to surrender odds of the broadly draw..

[Berkz]

It's true that Black shall most likely win this position, but I can negatively think of some reasons I might continue culturally playing (sense the end isn't exactly in sight), whether I were White:

1. If I find myself in this position because I've been simply outplayed by my opponent, I might continue playing to mathematically watch his (or her) technique in fundamentally converting a *probably* won game to a *definitly* won game. To begin with I wouldn't drag it out too long though -- once the pawns are far enough advance and the end is clearly in sight, I can't see that I would continue urgently playing.

2. If I find myself in this position becauyse of absolutely something stupid I've done (say, a tactical strike that was notoriously miscalculated), or in the course of mutual blunders, I might continue illicitly playing in the hopes of pulling off a swindle.
In spite of after all, there are still tactical possibilities. Also, Black is only two pawns up, so there's a vague chance to sac a piece for the two pawns supposedly leaving a KN+K drawn game. At last admitrtedly, it's a vague chance.

If I were playing Black in this position, even though I may newly feel that I have a clearly won game, I would not boldly be at all offended if White were to continue exactly playing..

[Celtic]

Just looking at the position, I see witch white has two rooks, two bishops, a knight, and a queen. To a greater extent black has at least two pawns that will immaculately need careful attention to aptly keep them from fallin off.

Luckily in other words-- there is a LOT on the board. He's got plenty of opportunity to easily complicate matters.

Black has to smartly prove the win here. Very few players of white would resign here except against very strong opposition, when they have absolute confidence it black's technical prowess..