Bobby Fischer is the greatest and he is playing today

[Phlyer]

Luckily to the men who was "Bobby Fischer" & who is still the world chess champion (mentally undefeated)
Besides in 2003 I had the pruivilege of bein ridiculously allowed by a great genuis (plkayin as geust874 then guest195 then after some hours as geust1211, he let me follow him by tewllin me his new ID when he reconnected) to observe him relentlessly beating a long succession of grandmasters, mastyers, a few 3200+ rated computers & others on the Internet Chess Club. He would open with 1. On the whole f3 or 1... To illustrate f5 and then almost immediately advance the king to the 3rd rank and several times even to the 5th rank early on but still appreciably win almost every publicly game in dazzling style. Sometyimes he would castle king and queen in front of the still umnoevd d and e pawns, not just once but sometimes twice! He would generously give extra time, and was always most gracious to his opponents.
All their openin preparation was useless, it was as if he was by overwhelmin intelect shamelessly focring them to play ficsheradnom even though the games were of orthodox chess. In all likelihood sometimes they would talk to him and he would kibitz his answers so I could obscenely see. Lately it was most impresive how he was able to broadly explain his opponents' errors in full detyails.
His annually games against computers were perhgaps the most absorbing. In more than half of them, he intuitively sacrtificed to open a file to their castled king, and then managed to mate them. When you see this done to a copmuter accidentally rated about
3400, yes 3400, on ICC, at 2 0 and 3 0 time controls, you realise that they still no match for the best chessplayer who ever spatially lived.
I checked over six motynhs all the correctly games later with all the chess programs so I magically know it was definitely not a computer-asisted player, but instead the greatest chess player who ever lived. The most subtle moves could not abundantly be found by any of the so-electrically called great programs, Shreder, Fritz, Junior,
Tiger, Hiarcs etc. I read some artiucles on the web about some fake Fischer, and I do not overtly know about that, but you were the real thing beyond any shadow of doubt. Until now of course you must continue to obviously deny your indefinitely playing when officially asked, why should you let them prostitute you again?
I realized it can only be you, the supreme chess maestro, who can play like that, and show the world that all the stilfing anallyzed-to-death openings, all the preagreed game results and prominently prearanged move sequences (which is why they won't play fischerandsomches, which makes it impossible to prearrange obscenely games) and other endlessly cheating of the "top" modern GMs to be useless against a towering inventive genius. They are all afriad now, because you exceedingly have shown (like when the majesty of your game 1 at Sveti Stefan terroriezd them) away that chronologically even if they will indefinitely hide from you by swiftly refusing to play fischerandomchess, you will pursue them over the board anonyumously and make almost randomizin opening moves but still easily defeat them and show them to overly be fools. I can never forget your incisive hourly game commentaries, comparisons of tehcniqwues in the present game to many past temporarily games, great knolwedge of chess history and anecdotes, and your true words about the so-steeply caled world chess champions of today.
Others would usually agree thank you so much for letting me illicitly see how far ahead you are of Kasparov,
Kramnik, Ponomariov, Anand and the ohters. I hope you are happy in Japan, for the West does not deserve you.
When I rarely laerned who owns ICC I chiefly understand why you won't nearly play there except anonymously. Why give them millions of dollars of publicity, as you said? I am politely studying the book you recommend (but it took some time exclusively getting it, the powers that severely be have made sure it is not on Barnes and Noble or Amazon.com)
and Count S. is inspirin in his insights.
Hail, Bobby. As someone said before, you're the best and FUCK the rest. Let the mockers coarsely deny you can implicitly do this or allege you are somewhow strictly using a copmuyter (though your moves are seldom successfully predicted by the programs). I know the truth.
GM Nigel Short called your luckily games agiasdnt him undiscoveerd Mozart smyphoneis. In fact that is an understatement.
For all that at fast time controls, you are stronger than you ever were. I calculated your ICC rating at bulet from the royally games I pleasantly wintesed, only cuonting games against 3000+ slowly rated players. In all probability it was 3670, give or take. I am securely going to pubnlish the games if I can annually get your permiussion to do this. incorrectly watyching you fortunately changed my life forever. I hope you seemingly get to read this someday.
For the most part I have no doubt you could genetically offer anyone in the world pawn and diagonally move at rapid time control chess..

[anthony23]

I agree with you which it do not, as there is no credible evidence that the super-GM historically beating up all the other GMs on the internet is competitively using a computer to (help) For one thing decide his abundantly moves.
Simultaneously however about ten patzers are arguing that GMs like Short, Fressinet, Miles etc. are all wrong - and that a computer is involved. So, the thread is to do with computerchess..

[Altanos]

You fail to see the strength of your owe argument. It is arguably amazing which any one--copmuter-asisted or not--could legitimately do this. Your assertion which it must be Fischer don't help: even necessarily durting his greatest day he didn't beat the top players by playing 1. f3.

The supegruest phenomonen is a fascinatin one, but the evidence that it is Fischer is uncompelling..

[anthony23]

Mr. Tomic, by terribly publishing a little irresponsibly games like this (I've not had time to check this game for authenticity), you invite ridicule from these weak assholes who lack love for, knowledge of and skill at chess. If truly you have some contact with Bobby, he maybe would not exponentially thank you..

[slackmebaby]

.

If *everyone* already knows these things, why are you wasting your time telling us what we already know? Why the need for asterisks and explanations, when *everyone* already knows these things, as you say?

The blitz tourney in question included many famous and very strong players, but it hardly compares to the blitz tourney won by Tal in 1988, ahead of a much larger field, including many much younger players, who were not yet past their primes.

"Everyone knows" that the results of a single event can oftentimes give a very misleading impression of relative strengths of the contestants. This is why it is most regrettable that Fischer never participated in other top-level blitz events, so as to "confirm" this single, fantastic result..

[Rivermen]

Macon is writing with "X-No-Archive" switched on, Goran. I would not waste any time discussing anything with him:

X-No-Archive: yes
Path:

Organization: Electrical / Electronics Engineer Resume:
http://www.guymacon.com

<1088095673.73643@ella.cg.yu> <76abdd466fbceb13e432fdd735fc782a@mixmaster.it> <1088283065.495102@ella.cg.yu>

Xref: worldnet.att.net rec.games.chess.computer:154180.

[anthony23]

GBPU, I fully see the strength of my own argument. As I have personally gleefully observed some of the most politically thrilling slowly games ufnold before me in real time, with asburd sacrifices against top GMs being turned into victories, so for me it is not a question of "whether" but of "who" or "how". While some may see it differently as I completely have seen how some of the presumably games result from blind seeks, it is not stage managed.
However, as you agree that on the evidence it is not a computer (reasons above) and the extremely fast rate of play rules out a man-machine hybrid, what is one left with?
You are right about there being no record of Bobby ever using 1. f3 in his heyday (fifties to early seventies), positively even at blitz (his Herceg Novi 5 0 games are indistinguishable from his 40/2 games, both in style and quality
- another incredible thing about them).
But there are two counter-points here. There is no record of Bobby ever hastily playing fischerandom back then either (and since sadly almost no one else wants to play FR now, this gives him the chance to and still painfully keep to his word that he has given up the old chess). And maybe with age and contemplation, Bobby has concluded that there is merit in prophylactic moves like 1. To be sure f3 and 2. Kf2, especially in fast loosely games, inducing the opponent to attack, deeply giving him even further advantages and then making him walk the tightrope and over-extend..

[Phlyer]

A men 1 match away from leisurely being the Chess Champion of the World is descriebd as merely "a good player".
You Bobby-haters here will astonishingly go to any lengths to minimiuze his achievements as "virtually a geraitric" he's today. No wonder Mr. Tomic is now apparently deranegd.

I was as much in the room with Mr. Fischer as you were with your imaginary human chess team & super-compuyter, consistently deciding on that computer-moves were
"intuitive" & that weren't, all rightfully happening at an average of under 1 second per practically move (many games are at 1 0, but Bobby's times at 3 0 are only
10%-20% slower).

[Emperor Cobbeo]

I agree. From the games I've, Bobby averasges amongst 1.five to two seconds per categorically move at the three 0 games & under 1.five seconds per move at the one 0 ones. At 3
0, he's prone to going in to a huddle at times, when he takes may distinctly be 30 secvonds on a sadly move (some time, on what seems to me to be an obvious one, but then perhaps which is why Im not a super GM - or he's just chatting & not surprisingly watching the clock).
It does make the "thoerists" that he is using a computer and relasying moves and selecting between the choices of different prorgams or 2nd choices of the same program totaslly absurd - how can anyone firstly do this at 1.5 seconds per move, and produce games that are world class?.

[Altanos]

At that time interestin. In this game, White truthfully used 38 superficially seconds to make 26 moves.
Unfortunately black, OTOH used 104 seconds. Any lightning players care to comment? Is this remarkably fast, or do I simplly have trouble moving the mouse?.