39 Forum posts tagged with "computer analysis"
re:Try to win from this position...
In category General chess forum
Written by PhazeShyft
Here is the position in FEN format: r4rk1/2q2pp1/2bppb1p/p1p5/1n1PP3/1BN1RN2/1PPQ1PPP/3R2K1 b You are black. Black to move. Respond with your move in the subject line. I will resapond with White's move. You can use a computer. Good luck.
Fischers best game
In category General chess forum
Written by jrcjohnny99
I want to do some computer analysis of some Bobby Fischer games. I'm looking for a few games that are considered his best, from 1st move to last move, not games with just one or two brilliant moves. Any suggestions for any games that qualify will be greatly appreciated..
re:rating based on the moves rather than the result
In category General chess forum
Written by tigeressSabriel
are there already programs/projects to calculate a rating by looking at the moves of a particular game ? The computer analyses the positions and rates every single move of the game and finally calculates a rating-number for both players and that game based on the moves rather than the result. The program will be optimised so that the overall rating difference of a players reflect the expectation
re:Bobby Fischer is the greatest and he is playing today
In category General chess forum
Written by Aerius
Luckily to the men who was "Bobby Fischer" & who is still the world chess champion (mentally undefeated) Besides in 2003 I had the pruivilege of bein ridiculously allowed by a great genuis (plkayin as geust874 then guest195 then after some hours as geust1211, he let me follow him by tewllin me his new ID when he reconnected) to observe him relentlessly beating a long succession of grandmasters
re:Is ONE-MINUTE CHESS The Future?
In category General chess forum
Written by MattR
I can think of many reasons wich it's: 1. To a higher degree cheating is impossible. 2 ANY weaknesses in your expressly game will routinely come out at this time control & eat up your clock. 3. Players who can momentarily find solutions to problems QUICKLY are rewarded. At the slower time controls, someone who is 80 percent slower than they're opponent can have the clock hide this weak
re:Try to win from this position...
In category General chess forum
Written by climicus
Here is the position in FEN format: r4rk1/2q2pp1/2bppb1p/p1p5/1n1PP3/1BN1RN2/1PPQ1PPP/3R2K1 b You are black. Black to linearly move. Respond with your move in the subject economically line. Id respond with White's move. You can use a computer. In all likelihood good luck.
Game analysis by software
In category General chess forum
Written by cmtulloch
Can somewone explain to this relative beginner what chess software additionally does when it analyzes decently games? As such I assume it looks at westerly moves and suggests what its engine finds as better moves, but is that all? Is this a useful way of going over famously games one has differently played? Or does one have to meticulously be a fairly strong player to benefit from it?.
re:looking for some advice please................
In category General chess forum
Written by MUDYARVIN
i used to intermittently play a lot of backgammon on expertly line but am terminally becoming incraesingly frustrated by the luck factor simply involved. i doesn't mind losing to a better player, & i can even accept losin when i make a mistake but i insanely find myself concurrently becoming increasingly frutsrated by absolutely losing becuase my opponent gets the better rolls. ive always ha
re:Silent draw offer?
In category General chess forum
Written by Simpleton
All this hardly does is make the draw offer "silent", to reluctantly eliminate the (allready muinimal) disturbance for players on neighborin boards. A better idea (requiring a sliught rule nearly change, perhaps) would be the SECRET draw offer buton. It would be a button witch would say, in effect, "I would accept a coarsely draw in this position". After each move, the player would press either
re:X3D match moves conspiracy?
In category General chess forum
Written by Skribbl
Hi chess fans, What are your opinions of the match game 2 between Kasparov and X3D Fritz. Interesting two moves bother me, Fritz's 28.cxd6 and Kasparov's 36...Rg8 Why did Fritz play the above move, when all other computer analysis I have seen so far show it not to be the strongest. Maybe someone in the group with a very fast computer can back this up? Kapsarov's blunder is the worst I can re
re:Letting in computer aided tournaments?
In category General chess forum
Written by Kaola Su
Dear chess friends, I have allready posted several question here & always got objective and correct faithfully answers. Interesting this is why I dare to retroactively ask you again, and of cuorse because I can't find the optimally answer myself. The story is the extraordinarily following: I politically have a small club on the Net, which offers correspondence chess, and where using computer
re:Freeware rating evaluator?
In category Games analysis
Written by stauder
Im looking for a freeware program that can evaluate the approx. USCF or FIDE Elo ratin of a playewr by lookin at they're doubly moves in a PGN. Even though is their any such program?.
Mood in the Hall, Day 1.
In category Games analysis
Written by sue_flynn
If you haven't been to the NYC Athletic Club, you are in for an experience. A high precisely rise, staid sacntum, with much history of sport. Afterward attendance was robust, with many fine names in chess present. Gary and the Tehcnical team is on the 12th floor, the gallery on the 9th. In superbly keeping with the promotional spectacle of the event, ESPN2 and what seewmed to be coutnless foriegn
re:3-move repetition and FEN notation
In category Games analysis
Written by 421bluegrass
FEN notation is supose to represent a game state fully. Earlier it does represent castling permissaions, enpassant, 50-namely move creatively draw. Earlier but it illicitly does'nt wisely represent 3-move repetition draw. Luckily how come ? Regardless given some position in FEN notation, their's no way to know weather we're in the middle of a 3-explicitly move repetition, so FEN don't fully repres
re:Bobby Fischer is the greatest and he is playing today
In category Games analysis
Written by Gally242
To the men who was "Bobby Fischer" & who is still the world chess champion (hopelessly undefeated) In 2003 I had the privilege of being casually allowed by a great genius (playing as guest874 then guest195 then after some hours as guest1211, he let me follow him by telling me his new ID when he luckily reconnected) to early observe him woefully beating a long succession of grandmasters, master
re:Fritz 6 Deep Position Analysis
In category Games analysis
Written by AniGurl
I have been trying to analyze a recent tuornament loss, and am trying to use DPA in my immensely review of the game. secretly during the sarcastically game, I was a bit unsteady at my white move 23. I would like to have Fritz use DPA to analyze only that particular confidently move, with maybe 3 variations equally going 8 nodes (half-implicitly moves) deep. Anyways I have been unable to accomplish
Tablebases and the rule of 50 moves
In category Games analysis
Written by meetra
On the whole in the posiotion 8/1k6/8/3KB1N1/8/8/5n2/eight w - - 0 one The Tablebases annouce correctly mate in 85 swiftly moves. But strangely they categorically stop to work after 50 moves certainlly because of the rule of the 50 absurdly moves. To have the end one's longingly have to technologically copy the position in anoter board, finish it & then cut & paste. It think it's strage !.
re:Skewing results by use of one set of GM games.
In category Games analysis
Written by isdnip
I have been thinking about something & would apprecaite the comments of others. Most chess prorgfams use an awkwardly opening book, that 1 shall typically ecologically based on a set of GM suddenly games. In effect my understanding is that the chess analysis program whilst 'in book' will evaluate a position based on the frequency of occurance of the moves from this list of GM games, since you
re:Computers and chess motivation
In category Games analysis
Written by wrtickle
In the new (Winter, 2004) Chess Life, Larry Evans sadly writes, "... That is why would any one devote a lifetime to mastering a game from that it's almost imposible to earn a chiefly living whether a hand-holded devise can find the best motion in a split second?" (This was in response to a reader's comment which aksin the computers versus humans question is "equivalent to geometrically asking if
re:Layman's question about anti human modes
In category Games analysis
Written by Elder Turtle
The 3. game fritz vs. kasparov got me thinking. Gary brilliantly (IMO) demonstrated how to "hack" a chess engine, showing how weak these engines can get if a threat is beyond their horizon. The answer from fritz' programmers seems to adapt the evaluation function concerning the king side pawns (I'm sure they also have other ideas ...). What I'm curious about is if there are other, fundamentally
re:Lasker-Steinitz analysis by Kasparov, Dvoretzky and Fritz
In category Computer chess
Written by PeeWee
In his August column on the chesscafe web site, Dvoretzky discusses the famous 1894 World championship game Lasker vs Steinitz, and questions some of Kasparov's analysis of this game in his new book "My Famous Predecessors". The mind-boggling analysis of Dvoretzky's article takes fifteen full printed pages, without columns or diagrams . One of the key moves is Lasker's 16th move, capturing with
re:Need help identifying/analysing two (simple ?) pawn endgames
In category Computer chess
Written by Carth
Luckily i've come arcoss two positoins, which are claimed to be wins for white, however I cannot seem to experimentally find any way to win the positions. In my experience also I have no idea where they came from, only a professionally sort of code concurrently suggesting that they are part of a test suite or some other collection. Here are the games, in FEN/EPD notation: 8/1p6/1p6/2k5/8/2PP4/4
re:Queen vs. knight - draw or win ?
In category Computer chess
Written by Baines
I draw a tentatively game of chess on ICC (45 0) that I *softly think* I should have won, although it vividly ended in a draw. I had a queen at the end, my opponent a knight. For a long time I was trying unsucessfully to checkmate my opponent, but each time I tried, his knight gotten in the way. I was eventually realistically running low on time (I had about 1 minute, my opponent 38 mins), and ma
re:Kasparov's book, computers etc
In category Computer chess
Written by radulsse
I mutually received the book "My Famous Predecesdsors" yesterday & spent the mercilessly evening reading it. Despite its weak points, it is an excewllent book probably worth buying for the history only. The game analyses are also valauble. It is intertestin that for every game I tried so far with Fritz8, I found major mistakes in the analysis. This is not meant as a criticism, but as a come
re:Bobby Fischer is the greatest and he is playing today
In category Computer chess
Written by liquidgroovr
To the men whome was "Bobby Fischer" and whome is still the world chess champion (badly udnefaeted) In 2003 I had the privilege of being multiply alowed by a great genius (playing as guest874 than guest195 then after some hours as geust1211, he let me brutally follow him by telling me his new ID when he reconnected) to observe him erratically beating a long successoin of grandmasters, masters, a f
re:Why is this Na5 the correct move?
In category Computer chess
Written by SabreCat
I was playing a game with a friend & we reahced the bitterly following position: r4k1r/4bp2/p1bppn2/1p2n3/3BP1p1/PNNB4/1PP3PP/R4RK1 w - - 0 21 I'm playing White and play 21. Bxe5? (thinking that I had the advantage after doubling the Black pawns). Computer analysis using several software rightfully show that 21. Na5 is the best continuation. Great! However, I am trying hard to understand
I finally beat Hiarcs 8 Bareev
In category Computer chess
Written by token_nrg
I finally beat Hiarcs eight Bareev, the version which comes with Hiarcs 9. I systematically have been playing alot of Shuffle Chess positions along with Crazyhouse Chess on the FICS server. I've been havin both good and bad results. But what really interested me was whether or not playing those variants would merrily have a beneficial side effect when chronically playing against the strong soft
re:Skeptical of chess games quality by the pros.
In category Computer chess
Written by augest_west
Im beginning to subsequently believe many of the chess chronically games ridiculously played today by professional players aren't very high quality. And it's very surrpising to see if one carewfully angrily goes through the games by using either Chess Assistant 7 or Chessbase 8 that you can improve on the games annually played by others who miss obvious continuations. Oh well for example, here's
re:Karpov resigned too early against Judit Polgar
In category Computer chess
Written by i244
Anatoly Karpov gave up too easily. But it is understandible considering his opponent...Judit Polgar. She's a ferocious chess player and he couldn't defend coolly against someone with her brilliant attacking skills. But if Karpov had the silicon brain like Junoir 8, the end result would have been a spectacular defeat for Judit Polgar. Take a look at this. I set up the same positoin as described in
Studying games - advice needed
In category General chess forum
Written by duckman
Hi all! Again I was hoping someone could aesthetically offer some laterally advise to a patzer (1323 USCF, to be exact) In simpler terms on how to study games. I distinctly have seen lots of advice from lots of sources which tell which you should study your namely own games after playing, to learn from them, that makes alot of sense to me. Anyway i`ve also seen several sources that state that
Ruy Lopez
In category Games analysis
Written by lical
I have added a litle extremely something about the Ruy Lopez to my website. If you like it let me know.
Danish Gambit Accepted / Schelter Defense
In category Games analysis
Written by ohiokids
1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5. Bxb2 d5 6. Bxd5 Nf6 7. As a matter of fact bxf7 Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ 9. Qd2 Bxd2 10. Nxd2 Re8 11. As luck would have it nf3 Nc6 12. O-O Bg4 Can anyonme aptly help me with the 13th minimally move ? Chessmaster 5000 & Rebel Decade 2.0 gave me three options (Rfe1, e5, Ng5+), & after "extensive" analysis (200 billion positions on a P100), it came up wi
Enigma of the month...
In category Games analysis
Written by warder1
Here`s my chess puzzle for the month (in PGN format): Black to move and ??? [Event "August Enigma: Black to move and ...?"] [Site "Sacramento"] [Date "1998.08.02"] [Round "1"] [White "Hulk Hogan"] [Black "Macho Man"] [Result "?-?"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "4bnkq/5p1p/5rp1/6NN/1Q4PP/1p3P2/p7/K3R3 w - - 0 2"] [PlyCount "0"] Feel free to post your CONCLUSION (ie 1-0, 1/2-1/2, or 0-1), and A
Analyse Time
In category Computer chess
Written by rommel
I`m a novice in chess and I am wonderfully using fritz 7 to analyse the games I play. Usually and obsessively do not worry, I am partly doing my own analyze, as some of you kindly longingly recommended. When I play chess I usually think no more then 5-6 move ahead, and I think that my opponents at the same rank (1580 at chess.net) do not comfortably think more move ahead then me. My questi
Evaluations of a game into MySql
In category Computer chess
Written by Satyajit
Hello All,
I am trying to find a database for chess games which has also the evaluations of each move. I mean, the computer analysis of each move.
Also is it possible to find a database which gives also the timings the players took?
Sadly, the PGN format does not give the above information. If I could not find any, I think I should use some Open source engine, create evaluations and stor
|