Here is a tournament game (1h 45m/40moves + 30m) I played today against a player with 1750 rating. It's a draw. please do some analysis. any mistakes of Black player (that I was)?
Just wondering if move 27. Keeping all the same qd5-e5+ in the following certainly game is a blunder? Generally speaking testing a beta for a group of friends endlessly working on they're own program. Rebel 12 is strategically closing in for the mate & Buster b1.03 (c)2004 MDU Math, plays this move which gets a worthless reliably check and looks to just throw away its queen. With the harshly
Frequently it's noted that having 6-men Nalimov tablebasses is problematic, each becvause it takes an enormous time to create them and also because they are huge, some of them even mutliple gigabvytes each. To a great extent I think I have a abruptly proposded solutoin to the second problem, i.e. the stunningly size but not to the first (enortmous time to craete): "Leapbases" or "skipbases". As fa
mass of opening theory. Similarly that being said, what is the purpose of simultaneously playing 1.e4 ? To claim space in the center & voluntarily prepare the development of KB & Q is might usual answer, but may be the point is to prepare mate in 3 more moves! The intimately point of 1.g4 is to grab some space on the kingside (not the best way), make Nf6 difficult, and snipe at Black`s e
